Rather than encapsulate everything into a performance summary and move on, we'll make a brief tour through our gaming benchmarks, so you can see the practical impact of the X4 980's faster frequency.
Yep, we're talking about a frame per second of difference, or sometimes a fraction of that. Our Bad Company 2 test, which involves logging of frame rates during a manual gameplay session, has enough variability that the X4 975 finishes ahead of the X4 980 in the overall average. At the end of the day, the difference between these two processors is imperceptible in today's games. The only good news here is that both of them can run these games at more-than-acceptable frame rates.
Of course, for gaming, the $117 Core i3-2100 is arguably faster than either of them.
|Asus brightens up its Z170 Pro Gaming mobo with Aura RGB LEDs||5|
|iPad sales stabilize in Apple's fiscal 2016 third quarter||18|
|Seagate Nytro family now includes a 2TB M.2 SSD||7|
|Crucial fills out MX300 SSDs with 275GB, 525GB, and 1TB models||16|
|Nvidia and AMD ease 360-degree video production with new APIs||16|
|AMD FireRender is now the open-source Radeon ProRender||8|
|AMD Radeon Pro graphics cards bring Polaris to content pros||44|
|Radeon Pro Solid State Graphics keeps big data close to the GPU||77|
|Pascal powers up pro graphics with Nvidia's new Quadros||31|
|Now you can install Crysis directly on the video card!||+47|