Rather than encapsulate everything into a performance summary and move on, we'll make a brief tour through our gaming benchmarks, so you can see the practical impact of the X4 980's faster frequency.
Yep, we're talking about a frame per second of difference, or sometimes a fraction of that. Our Bad Company 2 test, which involves logging of frame rates during a manual gameplay session, has enough variability that the X4 975 finishes ahead of the X4 980 in the overall average. At the end of the day, the difference between these two processors is imperceptible in today's games. The only good news here is that both of them can run these games at more-than-acceptable frame rates.
Of course, for gaming, the $117 Core i3-2100 is arguably faster than either of them.
|Thermaltake View 27 case offers a birds-eye view of builds||15|
|Nixxes turns out another Deus Ex: Mankind Divided patch||9|
|Upcoming Samsung CF791 is a high-contrast FreeSync ultrawide||10|
|Deals of the week: an unlocked Skylake CPU for cheap and more||14|
|PCIe 4.0 won't actually deliver 300 watts from the slot||53|
|iOS 9.3.5 fixes serious zero-day vulnerabilities||11|
|Intel 600P Series SSDs bring NVMe into the M.2 mainstream||37|
|Canon EOS 5D Mark IV offers more pixels and better autofocus||59|
|Adata Ultimate SU800 SSDs use floating-gate 3D NAND||10|
|Stupid physics getting in the way of all our fun.||+30|