Rather than encapsulate everything into a performance summary and move on, we'll make a brief tour through our gaming benchmarks, so you can see the practical impact of the X4 980's faster frequency.
Yep, we're talking about a frame per second of difference, or sometimes a fraction of that. Our Bad Company 2 test, which involves logging of frame rates during a manual gameplay session, has enough variability that the X4 975 finishes ahead of the X4 980 in the overall average. At the end of the day, the difference between these two processors is imperceptible in today's games. The only good news here is that both of them can run these games at more-than-acceptable frame rates.
Of course, for gaming, the $117 Core i3-2100 is arguably faster than either of them.
|MSI's new gaming notebook has a 2880x1620 screen||0|
|Next-gen Intel SSDs could have 2TB capacities, integrated heatsinks||13|
|Data suggests consumer drives are as reliable as enterprise models||45|
|Valve joins the Linux Foundation||50|
|USB group designing slim, orientation-independent connector||66|
|Are retail Radeon R9 290X cards slower than press samples?||217|
|Cherry intros MX RGB key switch; first keyboard due from Corsair||54|
|MSI's latest Z87 motherboard, GeForce GTX 760 graphics card have Mini-ITX dimensions||33|
|Tuesday Night Shortbread||21|