Rather than encapsulate everything into a performance summary and move on, we'll make a brief tour through our gaming benchmarks, so you can see the practical impact of the X4 980's faster frequency.
Yep, we're talking about a frame per second of difference, or sometimes a fraction of that. Our Bad Company 2 test, which involves logging of frame rates during a manual gameplay session, has enough variability that the X4 975 finishes ahead of the X4 980 in the overall average. At the end of the day, the difference between these two processors is imperceptible in today's games. The only good news here is that both of them can run these games at more-than-acceptable frame rates.
Of course, for gaming, the $117 Core i3-2100 is arguably faster than either of them.
|AOC U3277PWQU display is an affordable 32" 4K monster||0|
|Asus GTX 1080 and 1060 cards with faster RAM go the extra mile||16|
|Thermaltake's View 28 case can light up any room||23|
|Samsung unboxes Galaxy S8 and S8+ handsets and accessories||35|
|Aorus GA-AX370 Gaming K5 mobo trims a little fat||11|
|Windows 10 Creators Update set to hit PCs on April 11||23|
|SiSoft Sandra Platinum 2017 is ready for Ryzen||1|
|SteelSeries' Rival 700 gaming mouse reviewed||7|
|Intel lets loose Kaby Lake-based Xeon E3 v6 processors||65|
|They were going to launch a G-sync version but trying to represent the price induced an overflow error in their storefront software.||+34|