Power consumption and efficiency
The X4 980's TDP rating of 125W puts in firmly in a higher weight class than its most direct price and performance competitors from Intel, all of which are 95W parts—despite the fact that only the Intel processors have a built-in GPU. Nevertheless, power ratings and true power consumption are tricky and can differ substantially in some cases. Here are our results for the X4 980 against, well, nearly everything.
Our X4 980-based test system draws roughly 20W more when idling and 60W more while rendering than a comparable Core i5-2400-based system. Power draw under load has risen only 7W versus the Phenom II X4 975, but AMD wasn't exactly winning this fight prior to the X4 980's arrival.
This puppy isn't going to win any power efficiency awards for this rendering workload, either. Even the old Core 2 Quad Q9400—which, after all, was fabbed on a fairly similar 45-nm process—is more efficient than the X4 980. Only AMD's hexa-core Phenom IIs can come close to Intel's best 45-nm chips, because those Phenoms don't have to live so far up the voltage/frequency curve.
And then there are Intel's 32-nm chips, which occupy the top six spots.
|Cooler Master's MasterCase 5 reviewed||6|
|Run, gun, and murder aliens in 3D Realms' Bombshell||2|
|Light and shadow play together in Calvino Noir||1|
|Go pro with Razer's Wildcat Xbox One controller||4|
|CliffyB returns to the FPS scene with LawBreakers||10|
|There can be only one Headlander||5|
|Deals of the week: Asus' Strix GTX 970 and more||5|
|Chrome will soon block Flash ads and auto-playing background media||30|
|Vive VR headset is a victim of Valve Time, now set for 2016 release||12|