The unfortunate truth is that, right now, hardware-accelerated video transcoding on the PC is a mess.
Support for black-box encoders is spotty. We saw output quality at the same settings vary wildly depending on the conversion software used. Not only that, but none of the black-box encoders we used matched the quality level of unaccelerated software conversion. Sometimes, the differences were glaring, with the black boxes producing a ton more artifacts and adding ugly jaggies around hard object edges. The only upside, really, is the encoding speed. For some folks, maybe that's all that matters. Maybe it's simply about getting a big video down to a manageable file size in as little time as possible. If you're going to be watching the output on a 4" smartphone, perhaps that isn't a bad approach. Artifacts may not be visible or noticeable on that small a display, making encoder quality very much a secondary concern.
It's a shame, though. Four long years have passed since Elemental released Badaboom 1.0, and we're still facing a heavily fragmented ecosystem with vast inconsistencies in performance and image quality.
There may be hope on the OpenCL front. As we've seen, the OpenCL-accelerated version of x264 can produce relatively consistent output on different hardware. However, only a portion of the encoding pipeline is accelerated, with much of the work still being done on the CPU. On our test rig, substituting the Radeon HD 7750 for a much quicker Radeon HD 7850 didn't substantially reduce encoding times—they were still just over 30 seconds. It's possible some optimization work remains to be done. After all, we were using a beta, and the x264 developers haven't released a public version of their OpenCL-accelerated software yet. Still, we're not completely sold on the effectiveness of OpenCL acceleration here.
For the time being, the best option for quick, high-quality video transcoding is unfortunately to buckle down, get yourself a fast CPU, and run the best software encoder you can find (which may be Handbrake).
If performance matters to you more than quality, then using QuickSync in MediaConverter might be a suitable option. Encoding times will be very short, and image quality, while poorer than with Handbrake, will be adequate, especially if you'll be viewing the video on a smaller screen. Other hardware transcoders were slower than our CPU in MediaConverter, though, and we were generally unimpressed with the image quality of the hardware solutions in MediaEspresso.
46 comments — Last by kpewpew at 1:12 PM on 08/05/12
|AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 and RX Vega 56 graphics cards reviewedRadeons return to the high-end graphics market||254|
|AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 and RX Vega 56 graphics cards revealedGamers get Vegas to call their own||177|
|AMD's Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, Threadripper 1920X, and Threadripper 1900X CPUs revealedAMD returns to the high-end desktop||109|
|AMD's Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 1200 CPUs reviewedZen for everyone||121|
|Radeon Software Crimson ReLive Edition 17.7.2 boasts refinements galoreTidying up ahead of RX Vega||22|
|Antlion Audio's ModMic 5 add-on microphone reviewedPoor mic quality, begone||23|
|Ryzen Pro platform brings a dash of Epyc to corporate desktopsZen puts on a suit and tie||28|
|Corsair's Hydro GFX GeForce GTX 1080 Ti graphics card reviewedNo assembly required||28|
|The Tech Report's summer 2017 mobile staff picks||0|
|Go pro with the Asus ROG Strix XG27VQ gaming monitor||6|
|VivoBook W202NA is ready to brave the toughest of classrooms||0|
|MSI Infinite A desktops flaunt their gaming chops||9|
|Dual chambers and glass meet in the Lian Li PC-Q39||7|
|Razer Atheris is ready to strike on the move||13|
|Alphacool goes big with Eisbaer 420 AIO liquid cooler||6|
|Pythagorean Theorem Day Shortbread||20|
|Adata's XPG SX9000 NVMe SSD is its fastest yet||3|