Crysis 3 easily stresses these video cards at its highest image quality settings with 4X MSAA. You can see a video of our test run and the exact settings we used below.
The 7990 is a wreck without frame pacing, especially when it when it comes to delivering frames to the display. The jitter pattern is pronounced, with punishing frame times of 60-70 milliseconds on the high side. With pacing turned on, the jitter dissipates both in Fraps and FCAT, leaving the 7990's latency plot looking similar to a single-GPU solution's—only with lower frame times.
Meanwhile, the GTX 690's Fraps results show some stuttering that's smoothed out by the time the frames reach the display. I understand Crysis 3 uses a moving average of the last 250 ms worth of frame times in determining how much to advance its simulation from frame to frame. As a result, that variance in the GTX 680's Fraps results shouldn't have too much of a negative impact.
Frame pacing makes everything better. The 7990 trades blows with the GeForce GTX 690 for the top spot in each of our latency-focused performance metrics.
Once again, here are some videos illustrating the different cards' performance.
The 7990 without frame pacing:
With frame pacing enabled:
Now the GTX 690:
Finally, the Titan:
|Here are the winners of our Macrium Data Disasters contest||9|
|PC Perspective pokes and prods the Radeon Pro Duo||40|
|Microsoft finalizes closing of Lionhead Studios||15|
|AMD completes spin-off of its assembly and test operations||21|
|Deals of the week: Asus' MG278Q display for $400 and more||23|
|Phanteks wraps its Enthoo Evolv ATX case in sheets of glass||15|
|AOC Agon AG271QX is the first in a new line of gaming displays||27|
|We take a seat on Turris' VR Chair||24|
|HP's Chromebook 13 is dressed for success at $499||26|
|LOVE THIS ARTICLE. MORE OF THIS PLEASE.||+40|