Crysis 3 easily stresses these video cards at its highest image quality settings with 4X MSAA. You can see a video of our test run and the exact settings we used below.
The 7990 is a wreck without frame pacing, especially when it when it comes to delivering frames to the display. The jitter pattern is pronounced, with punishing frame times of 60-70 milliseconds on the high side. With pacing turned on, the jitter dissipates both in Fraps and FCAT, leaving the 7990's latency plot looking similar to a single-GPU solution's—only with lower frame times.
Meanwhile, the GTX 690's Fraps results show some stuttering that's smoothed out by the time the frames reach the display. I understand Crysis 3 uses a moving average of the last 250 ms worth of frame times in determining how much to advance its simulation from frame to frame. As a result, that variance in the GTX 680's Fraps results shouldn't have too much of a negative impact.
Frame pacing makes everything better. The 7990 trades blows with the GeForce GTX 690 for the top spot in each of our latency-focused performance metrics.
Once again, here are some videos illustrating the different cards' performance.
The 7990 without frame pacing:
With frame pacing enabled:
Now the GTX 690:
Finally, the Titan:
|The TR Podcast 176: Project Cars, cable to the Maxx & the Tao of Chi||1|
|Fractal Design's Node 202 case takes low-key approach to living room||3|
|MSI's Godlike X99 motherboard brings RGB LEDs to mortals||13|
|Thunderbolt 3 pushes 40Gbps through USB Type-C port||18|
|Killer slays wires with its Wireless-AC 1535 NIC||7|
|Here's the first desktop display based on quantum dots||20|
|Intel's Broadwell goes broad with new desktop, mobile, server variants||51|
|Nanotube-infused NRAM promises DRAM speeds with unlimited endurance||30|
|Antec puts a new Signature on its cases with the S10||31|