Crysis 3 easily stresses these video cards at its highest image quality settings with 4X MSAA. You can see a video of our test run and the exact settings we used below.
The 7990 is a wreck without frame pacing, especially when it when it comes to delivering frames to the display. The jitter pattern is pronounced, with punishing frame times of 60-70 milliseconds on the high side. With pacing turned on, the jitter dissipates both in Fraps and FCAT, leaving the 7990's latency plot looking similar to a single-GPU solution's—only with lower frame times.
Meanwhile, the GTX 690's Fraps results show some stuttering that's smoothed out by the time the frames reach the display. I understand Crysis 3 uses a moving average of the last 250 ms worth of frame times in determining how much to advance its simulation from frame to frame. As a result, that variance in the GTX 680's Fraps results shouldn't have too much of a negative impact.
Frame pacing makes everything better. The 7990 trades blows with the GeForce GTX 690 for the top spot in each of our latency-focused performance metrics.
Once again, here are some videos illustrating the different cards' performance.
The 7990 without frame pacing:
With frame pacing enabled:
Now the GTX 690:
Finally, the Titan:
|Gigabyte SA-SBCAP3350 puts formidable power on a single board||12|
|Alphacool Eisblock HDX-2 and HDX-3 help M.2 SSDs beat the heat||10|
|Corsair Lighting Pro Expansion Kit lets builders turn up the lights||8|
|Adata D16750 power bank is tougher than the average juice pack||16|
|Deals of the week: fast memory, an AM4 motherboard, and more||18|
|Corsair RMx White Series PSUs take a walk on the snowy side||24|
|Intel crams 100 GFLOPS of neural-net inferencing onto a USB stick||41|
|Toshiba's XG5 1TB NVMe SSD reviewed||9|
|Microsoft and Johnson Controls put Cortana in a thermostat||26|