Lining up the competition
We've run quite a few desktop drives through our storage test suite, including a handful of low-power models with spindle speeds close to 5,400 RPM.
|Interface||Cache||Spindle speed||Areal density|
|Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB||6Gbps||64MB||7,200 RPM||411 Gb/in²|
|Seagate Barracuda 3TB||6Gbps||64MB||7,200 RPM||625 Gb/in²|
|Seagate Desktop HDD.15 4TB||6Gbps||64MB||5,900 RPM||625 Gb/in²|
|WD Caviar Black 1TB||6Gbps||64MB||7,200 RPM||400 Gb/in²|
|WD Caviar Black 2TB||6Gbps||64MB||7,200 RPM||400 Gb/in²|
|WD Black 4TB||6Gbps||64MB||7,200 RPM||NA|
|WD Red 3TB||6Gbps||64MB||5,400 RPM||NA|
|WD Red 4TB||6Gbps||64MB||5,400 RPM||NA|
|WD VelociRaptor VR200M 600GB||6Gbps||32MB||10,000 RPM||NA|
|WD VelociRaptor 1TB||6Gbps||64MB||10,000 RPM||NA|
The Red 4TB's most direct competition is Seagate's Desktop HDD.15 4TB, which has a similar spindle speed and Seagate's blessing for use in desktop RAID configs. Seagate also makes a NAS-specific 4TB drive, but that model isn't quite finished working its way through our test suite. Stay tuned for a full review.
Another drive to watch is the Black 4TB. That model is WD's flagship 7,200-RPM desktop drive; it will highlight the performance difference between the two predominant spindle speeds in the desktop storage world.
While it's hard to rationalize how a 4TB mechanical hard drive really competes with SSDs that cost at least ten times more per gigabyte, the comparison has to be made. Here's the stack of solid-state drives that will be squaring off against the mechanical field.
|Crucial M500 240GB||256MB||Marvell 88SS9187||20nm Micron sync MLC|
|Intel 335 Series 240GB||NA||SandForce SF-2281||20nm Intel sync MLC|
|OCZ Vector 256GB||512MB||Indilinx Barefoot 3||25nm Intel sync MLC|
|Samsung 840 Series 250GB||512MB||Samsung MDX||21nm Samsung Toggle TLC|
|Samsung 840 Pro 256GB||512MB||Samsung MDX||21nm Samsung Toggle MLC|
These five drives nicely cover some of the more popular controller and NAND combinations for modern SSDs. We have representatives from the high end of the spectrum, the more affordable side, and multiple points in between. All the drives are in the 240-256GB range.
If you're a TR regular already familiar with our storage test system and methods, feel free to skip ahead to the performance results. Apart from minor tweaks to the table below, the rest of this page is copied lazily from previous reviews.
Our test methods
We used the following system configuration for testing:
|Processor||Intel Core i5-2500K 3.3GHz|
|CPU cooler||Thermaltake Frio|
|Motherboard||Asus P8P67 Deluxe|
|Platform hub||Intel P67 Express|
|Platform drivers||INF update
|Memory size||8GB (2 DIMMs)|
|Memory type||Corsair Vengeance DDR3 SDRAM at 1333MHz|
|Audio||Realtek ALC892 with 2.62 drivers|
|Graphics||Asus EAH6670/DIS/1GD5 1GB with Catalyst 11.7 drivers|
|Hard drives||Crucial M500
256GB with MU02 firmware
Intel 335 Series 240GB with 335s firmware
OCZ Vector 256GB with 10200000 firmware
Samsung 840 Series 250GB with DXT07B0Q firmware
Samsung 840 Pro Series 256GB with DXM04B0Q firmware
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB with MKA0A580 firmware
Seagate Barracuda 3TB with CC47 firmware
Seagate Desktop HDD.15 4TB with B660 firmware
WD Caviar Black 1TB with 05.01D05 firmware
WD Caviar Black 2TB with 01.00101 firmware
WD Red 3TB with 80.00A80 firmware
WD Red 4TB with 80.00A80 firmware
WD VelociRaptor VR200M 600GB with 04.05G04 firmware
WD VelociRaptor 1TB with 04.06A00 firmware
WD Black 4TB with 01.01L01 firmware
|Power supply||Corsair Professional Series Gold AX650W|
|OS||Windows 7 Ultimate x64|
Thanks to Asus for providing the systems' motherboards and graphics cards, Intel for the CPUs, Corsair for the memory and PSUs, Thermaltake for the CPU coolers, and Western Digital for the Caviar Black 1TB system drives.
We used the following versions of our test applications:
Some further notes on our test methods:
To ensure consistent and repeatable results, the SSDs were secure-erased before almost every component of our test suite. Some of our tests then put the SSDs into a used state before the workload begins, which better exposes each drive's long-term performance characteristics. In other tests, like DriveBench and FileBench, we induce a used state before testing. In all cases, the SSDs were in the same state before each test, ensuring an even playing field. The performance of mechanical hard drives is much more consistent between factory fresh and used states, so we skipped wiping the HDDs before each test—mechanical drives take forever to secure erase.
We run all our tests at least three times and report the median of the results. We've found IOMeter performance can fall off with SSDs after the first couple of runs, so we use five runs for solid-state drives and throw out the first two.
Steps have been taken to ensure that Sandy Bridge's power-saving features don't taint any of our results. All of the CPU's low-power states have been disabled, effectively pegging the 2500K at 3.3GHz. Transitioning in and out of different power states can affect the performance of storage benchmarks, especially when dealing with short burst transfers.
The test systems' Windows desktop was set at 1280x1024 in 32-bit color at a 75Hz screen refresh rate. Most of the tests and methods we employed are publicly available and reproducible. If you have questions about our methods, hit our forums to talk with us about them.
|Samsung's 28'' display serves up single-tile 4K at 60Hz for $800||115|
|Good Friday Shortbread||35|
|Friday night topic: where are the good ultraportables?||79|
|Deal of the week: Radeon R9 290X cards for... more than list?||19|
|Release roundup: Bits, pieces, and whole PCs||29|
|AMD posts another loss but beats Wall Street forecast||65|
|GlobalFoundries licenses Samsung process tech, grants AMD access to FinFETs||107|
|MSI shows next-gen Intel motherboards||46|