Please note that our load test isn't an absolute peak scenario. Instead, we have the cards running a real game, Skyrim, in order to show us power draw with a more typical workload.
The 290's power draw at idle is a little higher than the 290X's, possibly due to differences in voltage or chip binning. This small delta isn't anything to worry about, though.
Under load, well, like I said, the power limits on the 290 and 290X appear to be the same. The 290 is often faster than a GeForce Titan, but it gets there by using more power.
Noise levels and GPU temperatures
AMD's eleventh-hour decision to raise the 290's fan speed bought a few percentage points worth of added performance, but it means the 290 is relatively loud for a high-end graphics card.
For what it's worth, had AMD stuck with the original plan, the 290 would have been quieter than the R9 290X. The 290 originally registered 46.5 dBA on the meter under load.
|Civ: Beyond Earth with Mantle aims to end multi-GPU microstuttering||14|
|CPU startup claims to achieve 3x IPC gains with VISC architecture||14|
|VisionTek's new USB 3.0 thumb drive has SSD performance||28|
|Lian Li's latest Mini-ITX chassis houses 11 hard drives||30|
|Gmail and Google Now conspire to streamline your Inbox||9|
|In the lab: WASD's Code keyboard with Cherry MX clear switches||29|
|GeForce 344.48 driver enables DSR on Kepler, Fermi GPUs||82|
|ARM intros two new CCN 'uncore' products for data center SoCs||13|
|I just found this AMAZING trick! Call of Duty takes up 0GB if you just don't buy it!||+106|