We'll begin with a series of synthetic tests aimed at exposing the true, delivered throughput of the GPUs. In each instance, we've included a table with the relevant theoretical rates for each solution, for reference.
|Radeon HD 5870||27||68/34||154|
|Radeon HD 6970||28||85/43||176|
|Radeon HD 7970||30||118/59||264|
|Radeon R9 280X||32||128/64||288|
|Radeon R9 290||61||152/86||320|
|Radeon R9 290X||64||176/88||320|
|GeForce GTX 770||35||139/139||224|
|GeForce GTX 780||43||173/173||288|
|GeForce GTX Titan||42||196/196||288|
|GeForce GTX 780 Ti||45||223/223||336|
This color fill test is usually a better indication of memory bandwidth than anything else. The GTX 780 Ti lives up to its specs here, outperforming the 290X.
Nvidia's new flagship almost runs the tables in our texture sampling and filtering tests. Because the Kepler architecture can do full-rate FP16 filtering, the 780 Ti's lead over the R9 290X becomes commanding when we get into higher-precision color formats.
I'm not quite sure why the 780 Ti trails the GTX 780 and Titan in the FP16 filtering test. I double-checked the results, and they are correct. Could be that the 780 Ti is hitting some kind of thermal limit. That sometimes happens in these directed tests.
Tessellation and geometry throughput
|Radeon HD 5870||0.9||154|
|Radeon HD 6970||1.8||176|
|Radeon HD 7970||1.9||264|
|Radeon R9 280X||2.0||288|
|Radeon R9 290||3.8||320|
|Radeon R9 290X||4.0||320|
|GeForce GTX 770||4.3||224|
|GeForce GTX 780||3.6 or 4.5||288|
|GeForce GTX Titan||4.4||288|
|GeForce GTX 780 Ti||4.6||336|
I still don't have any answers from AMD about why the Hawaii-based products don't handle the higher levels of tessellation in TessMark all that well. Anyhow, the GTX 780 Ti has no such problem, and it cranks through the highly tessellated Unigine benchmark with ease, too.
|Radeon HD 5870||2.7||154|
|Radeon HD 6970||2.7||176|
|Radeon HD 7970||3.8||264|
|Radeon R9 280X||4.1||288|
|Radeon R9 290||4.8||320|
|Radeon R9 290X||5.6||320|
|GeForce GTX 770||3.3||224|
|GeForce GTX 780||4.2||288|
|GeForce GTX Titan||4.7||288|
|GeForce GTX 780 Ti||5.3||336|
The full-fledged GK110 acquits itself well here, but the R9 290X still has the edge in the majority of our shader tests. ShaderToyMark is probably the most interesting of these tests, and in it, the GTX 780 Ti makes major strides compared to the GTX 780 and Titan.
|G.Skill KM560 MX keyboard drops the numpad||8|
|Rumor: Acer Triton 700 may use an unreleased Pascal GPU||19|
|Silverstone Vital VT02 could hold a Core i7 in under two liters||7|
|Galax and KFA2 induct the GTX 1080 Ti into the Hall of Fame||21|
|Acer's Aspire GX-281 lineup brings Ryzen to the masses||16|
|Deals of the week: discounts on CPUs, mobos, and more||8|
|Asetek gets $600,000 from Cooler Master in AIO cooler patent spat||17|
|Acer Predator Triton and Helios laptops are ready for serious play||14|
|Intel enjoys healthy revenue and profits for Q1 2017||30|
|Unless Intel suddenly becomes very aggressive in its pricing, a Skylake-X will certainly cost a hell of a lot more than Ryzen CPU. And who cares if AM...||+66|