Our first attempt at overclocking one of Intel's new "Devil's Canyon" processors was, frankly, a little bit underwhelming. Intel had pitched these new processors as especially good for high clock speeds, thanks to some changes to the heat-transfer and power-delivery bits in the CPU package, but we couldn't get our Core i7-4790K review sample to run any faster than a regular Haswell-based 4770K. Many others in the press saw similar results. We liked other things about Devil's Canyon, such as the 4790K's higher stock clock speeds at the same price as the 4770K, but its overclocking prowess just didn't impress.
Then, frustratingly, we heard whispers from one vocal Intel employee who suggested that final, production versions of Devil's Canyon might perform better. I've gotta say, as a reviewer, I'm not fond of that entire concept. My great hope and expectation is that whatever chip we're reviewing is pretty well representative of what people will be buying soon.
But whatever. Maybe, in this case, it was true. Maybe there would be something different about the chips that hit store shelves. There is, of course, one simple way to find out.
That's why I was particularly receptive when the folks at MSI extended a tantalizing offer: let us send you a retail version of the Core i7-4790K along with one of our fancy Z97 MPower motherboards. You can overclock it and see how it goes.
Well, okay, then. Seems like it's worth a shot.
We're just looking at a single sample of a retail Core i7-4790K, so we're not exactly doing science to this thing. Whether or not our results will track with your own, should you buy a 4790K, is pretty much anyone's guess.
Heck, I didn't expect this, but MSI shipped the Core i7-4790K to us in the box with the Z97 MPower motherboard, covered in nothing but bubble wrap. I was somehow expecting a retail boxed processor, with the ain't-been-opened stickers still intact. Perhaps I should have mentioned that to them. The markings on the CPU's metal cap indicate a final product, but for all I know, MSI went through a big stack of 4790K chips and sent only the most frequency-friendly examples to guys like me. So caveat your emptors, folks. Who knows what any of this means.
I've got the MPower
I was happy to see the Z97 MPower make its way into Damage Labs. At $185 online, this is the sort of high-end board that, frankly, we've kind of avoided at times here at TR, simply because we're ridiculously frugal and tend to focus our reviews on cheaper boards where possible. The Z97 MPower is part of MSI's overclocking-centric motherboard series, and you'll pay a bit more to get its suite of extra-fancy features.
I've gotta admit, some of the perks are nice, not least of which is the look of the board itself. The MPower may be the handsomest motherboard ever to grace Damage Labs with its presence. Many of the premium features of the MPower's spec sheet are incredibly nebulous things like "enhanced components" and "OC certified" that don't make a lot of sense to me. (Who does this OC certification? Is there a board with strict criteria? Somehow, I doubt it.) Still, MSI has included some obvious nods to hard-core overclockers, like the row of multimeter-ready voltage-check terminals next to the ATX power connector and the ability to clock DDR3 DIMMs at speeds up to 3300 MT/s.
And, hey, this is just a really nice Z97 mobo, with a slot for M.2 SSDs and a gaggle of SATA 6Gbps and USB 3.0 ports.
The Z97 MPower's firmware interface is very similar to the one in MSI's Z97 Gaming 7 board that Geoff reviewed not long ago. You'll find everything you need there to make an Intel processor do unnatural things with its clock frequencies, and the interface itself looks as pretty as, you know, motherboard firmware can probably get.
I have to admit that I struggled to find a few settings every now and then, in part because I've spent more time recently with boards from Gigabyte and Asus. MSI has made some nice progress on its firmware, but the organization is a little different. For instance, the pane on the right side of the main menu where one can access the fan-speed controller disappears entirely once you start modifying something else, like CPU voltage. To get it back, you have to press the Escape key one more time than my instincts tell me should be necessary. Once you find the appropriate menu, though, the fan-control interface is slick and capable.
I did run into a few honest-to-goodness rough edges with the MPower board, too. For one thing, the CPU fan headers on this mobo only support PWM-style four-pin fans, a fact that isn't spelled out terribly prominently in MSI's documentation. The DC fan on my Thermaltake NIC C5 cooler acted strangely, and I couldn't sort out the problem until I happened to mention it to Geoff. He quickly explained that he'd run into the PWM limitation on some of MSI's other boards, and I instantly knew what was up. If you don't retain a Geoff on staff like I do, sorting out this problem may take you longer.
Fortunately, the MPower's system fan headers do support DC-style fans, and their speed-control settings can be set to key off of CPU temperatures. In seconds, I had the NIC C5's fan ramping up and down smoothly in response to CPU temperatures.
|Asus Tinker Board gives the Raspberry Pi 3 a run for its money||17|
|Mushkin enters the keyboard market with the Carbon KB-001||13|
|Report: PC gaming hardware market expands to an all-time high||9|
|Asus ROG Maximus IX Formula chills with an EKWB waterblock||1|
|Deals of the week: high-powered graphics cards, monitors, and more||7|
|Eurocom Tornado F5 SE mobile server can eat desktops for lunch||10|
|Microsoft releases Pix DX12 tuning and debugging tool for Windows||16|
|Cryorig's QF140 fans offer a choice of silence or performance||15|
|SteelSeries' Apex M500 keyboard reviewed||12|
|No one came into this article thinking TomsHardware actually took a hammer to an SSD as an endurance test, right? No? G-good, m-me neither.||+40|