Our low-end machine continues XP's winning streak, but with a smaller margin than the high-end box. Windows ME's core shows its age, placing a distant third.
The situation is repeated on the low end; WinXP loses to 2000 by a small margin, while WinME brings up the rear.
Next we move our testing parameters to the world of number crunching with ScienceMark. Running simulations of things I haven't a prayer of understanding, ScienceMark at least produces some results that are easy to read. Let's take a look.
With our low-end hardware, the high-end trend persists as 2000 and XP are too closely matched to call. ME's 9x core prevents ScienceMark from leveraging the full computational potential of the hardware, and it stays in last place.
From scientific math to 3D rendering, the POV-Ray test measures the time required to perform a raytrace rendering.
|Nvidia recalls Shield Tablet due to battery fire risk||23|
|Deals of the week: Samsung's 850 EVO 1TB for $310 and more||4|
|Report: new Google Glass is a clip-on model for businesses||9|
|14 million have upgraded to Windows 10 in its first 24 hours||56|
|EVGA X99 Micro 2 mobo offers USB-C in a microATX package||9|
|The Tech Report Podcast is live on Twitch||5|
|Wake-from-sleep vulnerability leaves UEFIs open to attack||31|
|GPU-Z utility gets a Windows 10 update||6|
|Windows 10's Solitaire games go freemium||130|