Our low-end machine continues XP's winning streak, but with a smaller margin than the high-end box. Windows ME's core shows its age, placing a distant third.
The situation is repeated on the low end; WinXP loses to 2000 by a small margin, while WinME brings up the rear.
Next we move our testing parameters to the world of number crunching with ScienceMark. Running simulations of things I haven't a prayer of understanding, ScienceMark at least produces some results that are easy to read. Let's take a look.
With our low-end hardware, the high-end trend persists as 2000 and XP are too closely matched to call. ME's 9x core prevents ScienceMark from leveraging the full computational potential of the hardware, and it stays in last place.
From scientific math to 3D rendering, the POV-Ray test measures the time required to perform a raytrace rendering.
|Microsoft Office welcomes Sway, a new authoring tool for web content||3|
|This might be why Windows 10 isn't called Windows 9||62|
|Here's another reason the GeForce GTX 970 is slower than the GTX 980||14|
|The Windows 10 Technical Preview is available now||39|
|ARM announces OS, server tools for the Internet of things||10|
|Borderlands 2 comes to SteamOS, and The Pre-Sequel will follow||15|
|Haswell duallie infiltrates Zotac Nano XS mini PC||7|
|Mozilla unveils $25 Matchstick HDMI dongle||15|