3DMark03 image quality
We've seen in past reviews that NVIDIA's GeForce FX cards have had problems rendering 3DMark03's Mother Nature scene correctly. When running with the 43.45 drivers, the GeForce FX hasn't had the dynamic range to render the sky correctly in the Mother Nature test. The Detonator 43.45 drivers also didn't receive WHQL certification from Microsoft, suggesting that they may have had problems passing the WHQL image quality tests, too.
Has NVIDIA cleaned up its act with the Detonator FX drivers?
Yes, they most certainly have. The images generated by the GeForce FX 5600 using the Detonator FX drivers look much closer to the image produced by Microsoft's DirectX 9 reference rasterizer than what was previously generated with the Detonator 43.45 drivers.
Images produced by the GeForce FX 5200 under the new Detonator FX drivers also look betterat least in terms of the skythan what was produced using NVIDIA's older Detonator drivers, but they're not as close to our reference image as what's produced by the GeForce FX 5600/Detonator FX combo. Also, the water doesn't look right with the Det FX drivers on the 5200.
|Radeon Pro Solid State Graphics keeps big data close to the GPU||60|
|Crucial fills out MX300 SSDs with 275GB, 525GB, and 1TB models||0|
|Nvidia and AMD ease 360-degree video production with new APIs||5|
|AMD FireRender is now the open-source Radeon ProRender||2|
|AMD Radeon Pro graphics cards bring Polaris to content pros||27|
|Pascal powers up pro graphics with Nvidia's new Quadros||25|
|Phanteks breaks into custom liquid cooling with its Glacier G1080||15|
|Adata covers all of its bases with fast, durable external SSDs||1|
|MSI's Radeon RX 480 Gaming family will arrive in mid-August||15|