Single page Print

Introduction — continued

We ran through three different demos in three different levels, with all tests conducted at 1024x768 in 32-bit color. I simply didn't have time to test multiple resolutions. Here are the results.

These scores seem to confirm the numbers Valve released yesterday. With the DirectX 9 codepath, the NV3x chips aren't running the game at acceptable frame rates. The mid-range Radeon 9600 Pro beats out the $500 GeForce FX 5900 Ultra. The NV3x codepath seems to help the FX 5900 Ultra appreciably, but not the FX 5600.

The Half-Life 2 benchmark outputs lots of useful data, and I haven't had time to process it all. However, the graphs below will give you a sense of how the cards performed over time. I've broken things out into mid-range and high-end cards in order to keep things from getting too cluttered. I've also omitted the Radeon DX8.1 data for the same reason (and because dropping to DX8.1 doesn't offer many performance benefits on R3x0 chips).

I won't say too much, but this is certainly an interesting preview of Half-Life 2 performance. I believe there were enough question marks and factors out of our control that I'd prefer to wait until we can do our own testing to draw many conclusions here. I can't wait to see how NVIDIA's new Detonator drivers affect these scores, as well as how the rest of the game development world reacts to recent events. 

Like what we're doing? Pay what you want to support TR and get nifty extra features.
Top contributors
1. Ryszard - $603 2. Hdfisise - $600 3. Andrew Lauritzen - $502
4. Redocbew - $350 5. the - $306 6. SomeOtherGeek - $300
7. chasp_0 - $251 8. Ryu Connor - $250 9. mbutrovich - $250
10. YetAnotherGeek2 - $200
AMD's Radeon Software Crimson Edition: an overviewSeeing red 113
AMD's Radeon R9 380X graphics card reviewedX marks the spot 252
Nvidia's GeForce GTX 950 graphics card reviewed...alongside the Radeon R7 370 163
Fable Legends DirectX 12 performance revealedA peek at the future of games and graphics 280
Tiny Radeon R9 Nano to pack a wallop at $650But AMD's performance numbers may overstate its case 187
GeForce GTX 980 Ti cards comparedEVGA, Gigabyte, MSI, and Asus square off 36
Asus' Strix Radeon R9 Fury graphics card reviewedFiji goes air-cooled 312
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X graphics card reviewedThe red team vents its Fury 690