Theoretical fill rate and memory bandwidth peaks don't necessarily dictate real world performance, but they're a good place to start.
|Core clock (MHz)||Pixel pipelines||Peak fill rate (Mpixels/s)||Texture units per pixel pipeline||Peak fill rate (Mtexels/s)||Memory clock (MHz)||Memory bus width (bits)||Peak memory bandwidth (GB/s)|
|Radeon 9600 Pro||400||4||1600||1||1600||600||128||9.6|
|Radeon 9600 XT||500||4||2000||1||2000||600||128||9.6|
|GeForce FX 5600 Ultra||400||4||1600||1||1600||800||128||12.8|
ATI hasn't done anything to increase the Radeon 9600 XT's memory bandwidth over the 9600 Pro, but XT's pixel and texture fill rates lead the pack.
Despite its higher theoretical pixel fill rate peak, the Radeon 9600 XT can't catch the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra in 3DMark03's single-textured fill rate test. However, the tables turn when we look at multi-textured performance, where the 9600 XT has a huge lead over even the 9600 Pro.
The Radeon 9600 XT improves upon the 9600 Pro's already impressive pixel shader performance by a small margin, but the XT really shines in vertex shader performance. A 50% improvement in vertex shader performance suggests maybe ATI spent a little time tweaking more than just the RV360's clock speeds.
|Steam Audio SDK promises better surround sound gratis||6|
|Deals of the week: a high-end Mini-ITX mobo, fast RAM, storage, and more||0|
|Asus lets its Ryzen-ready mobos roam||19|
|ASRock gathers its herd of AM4 motherboards||33|
|Rumor: Samsung Galaxy S8+ specs detailed||29|
|AMD's early Vega graphics card takes a turn in San Francisco||43|
|Samsung shows off its Exynos 9 SoC built on a 10-nm process||14|
|International Dog Biscuit Appreciation Day Shortbread||21|
|Cooler Master launches Ryzen-ready liquid-cooling AIOs||5|
|Best part of the article? We're flying home with Ryzen review samples as of this writing.||+41|