ShaderMark 2.0 is brand new and includes some anti-cheat measures to prevent drivers from applying questionable optimizations. The Radeons run the benchmark with straight pixel shader 2.0 code, but I've included results for the GeForce FX with partial-precision and extended pixel shaders, as well.
The Radeons are in a class all their own in ShaderMark 2.0, and the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra's performance is nothing short of embarrassing. The FX is way behind the Radeons across the board, and refuses to cooperate with a number of the shader tests.
Focusing on the Radeons, the 9600 XT is about 20% faster than the 9600 Pro, which nicely matches the 20% core clock speed difference between the two cards.
|Samsung's Galaxy Note 4 with the Exynos 5433 processor||47|
|You can now unlock your Chromebook with your phone||10|
|Deal of the week: A Radeon R9 290X for $233||111|
|AMD's new Fixer video is even crazier than the last||86|
|Leak pegs desktop Broadwell, Skylake for mid-year||54|
|Battlefield Hardline open beta scheduled for February 3||19|
|WSJ: Microsoft to back Cyanogen with $70M investment||55|
|You've goat to check out Silicon Power's new thumb drive||54|
|nvidia already released an official response: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spZJrsssPA0||+87|