ShaderMark 2.0 is brand new and includes some anti-cheat measures to prevent drivers from applying questionable optimizations. The Radeons run the benchmark with straight pixel shader 2.0 code, but I've included results for the GeForce FX with partial-precision and extended pixel shaders, as well.
The Radeons are in a class all their own in ShaderMark 2.0, and the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra's performance is nothing short of embarrassing. The FX is way behind the Radeons across the board, and refuses to cooperate with a number of the shader tests.
Focusing on the Radeons, the 9600 XT is about 20% faster than the 9600 Pro, which nicely matches the 20% core clock speed difference between the two cards.
|Logitech gaming mouse combines optical and motion sensors||0|
|Silent Power PC is cooled by copper foam||24|
|ARM-based Opteron now available in $2,999 developer kit||15|
|Best Buy CEO: Tablets 'crashing,' PC seeing 'revival'||99|
|Core i5 powers bizarro Android convertible||20|
|EA to charge $4.99/month for access to its biggest games||56|
|Gigabyte's Brix Gaming BXi5G-760 mini-PC reviewed||49|
|Orange you glad Asus made a mechanical gaming keyboard||42|