Six months ago, I wouldn't have even uttered "Athlon 64" and "budget" in the same breath. Today, however, relatively inexpensive chips like the Athlon 64 2800+ are making the Socket 754 platform a more affordable option for cash-strapped enthusiasts and anyone else who desires 64-bit compatibility and better media encoding performance than the Athlon XP can provide.
Looking at price alone, the SiS755 is certainly an attractive option, but can the chipset's features and performance keep up with its Athlon 64 competition? We tested a SiS755 board against VIA's K8T800 and NVIDIA's nForce3 150 and 250Gb chipsets to find out.
The SiS755 chipset is made up of SiS755 north bridge and SiS964 south bridge chips, which come with all the usual integrated features. On the north bridge, the SiS755 houses an AGP 8X interface and 16-bit, 800MHz bi-directional HyperTransport link, but that's about it. North bridge chips for AMD64 processors haven't been all that interesting since AMD took the memory controller, which is traditionally a north bridge component, and moved it onto the processor.
SiS links its north and south bridge chips with a proprietary MuTIOL interconnect that's 16 bits wide and runs at 533MHz in each direction. The interconnect yields over 1GB per second of bandwidth between the chipset's north and south bridge components, more than enough for the south bridge's integrated peripherals.
The SiS964 south bridge integrates a six-channel AC'97 audio controller, eight USB 2.0 ports, 10/100 Fast Ethernet, two ATA/133 IDE channels, and a couple of Serial ATA ports. The SiS964 also supports two-drive Serial ATA RAID 0, 1, and JBOD arrays.
The 755 chipset has what SiS calls a HyperStreaming architecture. HyperStreaming is designed to more efficiently move data within a system by splitting, prioritizing, and processing concurrent transactions over multiple links to ensure uninterrupted data transfers. The HyperStreaming architecture stretches from device-level links in the south bridge all the way through the MuTIOL interconnect and up to the north bridge, and we'll see in a moment how effectively it moves data around inside a system.
|LG UltraFine 4K and 5K displays are the new Apple monitors||28|
|Cuplex Kryos Next water block is heaven for control freaks||0|
|OWC Ministack places up to 6TB of storage atop Mac Minis||4|
|Gigabyte lets loose a flurry of BIOS updates with Kaby Lake support||1|
|Deals of the week: a GTX 1080, photography gear, and more||4|
|Geil Evo X memory kits with RGB LED lighting are now available||15|
|GeForce 375.70 drivers gear up for a raft of triple-A titles||4|
|AMD announces Radeon Pro drivers with scheduled releases||6|
|We're giving away our Aimpad R5 review unit||22|
|Absolutely. GCN is pretty much GCN, so the math backs this up: R9 290X = 1GHz x 2816 GCN CUs = 2816 CUGHz (pronounced "cougar hertz") RX 480 = 1.27GHz...||+44|