Our testing methods
As ever, we did our best to deliver clean benchmark numbers. Tests were run at least twice, and the results were averaged.
Our test systems were configured like so:
|Processor||Athlon XP 3200+ 2.2GHz|
|Front-side bus||400MHz (2 x 200MHz)|
|Motherboard||NVIDIA reference||DFI Lanparty NFII Ultra||VIA reference|
|North bridge||nForce2 Ultra 400 SPP||KT880|
|South bridge||nForce2 MCP2-Gb||nForce2 MCP-T||VT8237|
|Chipset drivers||NVIDIA ForceWare 4.24||NVIDIA ForceWare 3.13||VIA Hyperion 4.51|
|Memory size||512MB (2 DIMMs)|
|Memory type||Corsair XMS3200C2 DDR SDRAM at 400MHz|
Western Digital Raptor WD360GD Serial ATA hard drive
|Graphics||ATI Radeon 9800 XT with Catalyst 4.3 drivers|
|OS||Microsoft Windows XP Professional|
|OS updates||Service Pack 1, DirectX 9.0b|
Thanks to Corsair for providing us with memory for our testing. If you're looking to tweak out your system to the max and maybe overclock it a little, Corsair's RAM is definitely worth considering. We ran all the systems with 2-6-3-2 memory timings.
The test systems' Windows desktops were set at 1280x1024 in 32-bit color at a 75Hz screen refresh rate. Vertical refresh sync (vsync) was disabled for all tests.
We used the following versions of our test applications:
Our tests and methods are generally publicly available and reproducible. If you have questions about our methods, hit our forums to talk with us about them.
|Battlefield Hardline open beta scheduled for February 3||13|
|Deal of the week: A Radeon R9 290X for $233||47|
|AMD's new Fixer video is even crazier than the last||34|
|Leak pegs desktop Broadwell, Skylake for mid-year||33|
|WSJ: Microsoft to back Cyanogen with $70M investment||51|
|You've goat to check out Silicon Power's new thumb drive||53|
|We discuss the GeForce GTX 970 memory controversy||42|