Single page Print

Conclusions
The GeForce 6200 with TurboCache breaks some conventions, but it seems to make sense. This solution's performance isn't going to bowl anybody over, but the GeForce 6200 with a 64-bit/32MB TurboCache is fast enough to match a Radeon X300 with a full 128MB of local memory onboard. That's solid enough performance to convince me that this solution works, and I'd certainly prefer it to most of the other graphics solutions in the $79-99 range that NVIDIA is targeting.

And, jeez, I wish my laptop PC had this instead of 32MB of total video memory. Ugh.

The relatively weak performance of the GeForce 6200 with 32-bit/16MB TurboCache demonstrates that the TurboCache scheme isn't magic. NVIDIA isn't quite as able to mask system memory access latencies as one might hope, and bandwidth pressure isn't dramatically relieved by pixel shaders in today's games. The 32-bit/16MB TurboCache card may be superior to integrated chipset solutions, but I'm not convinced its performance is superior in a way that matters. The 64-bit/32MB TurboCache card really is the one to have. I'm curious to see whether a 64-bit/64MB config with a pair of 32MB DRAMs would substantially outperform the 64-bit/32MB card we tested. However you cut it, though, the TurboCache scheme or something like it appears to be the future of low-end graphics.

That said, NVIDIA deserves some praise for the GeForce 6200 GPU independent of the caching scheme. This graphics chip offers near-feature-parity with NVIDIA's high-end GPUs, and it brings an amazing feature set to the sub-$100 portion of the graphics market, including Shader Model 3.0 and three real vertex shader engines. The fact that this thing runs Doom 3 at over 70 frames per second in High Quality mode at 640x480 impresses the heck out of me.

The again, the fact that it does so with only 32MB of local memory is a sign of true innovation. 

Like what we're doing? Pay what you want to support TR and get nifty extra features.
Top contributors
1. GKey13 - $650 2. JohnC - $600 3. davidbowser - $501
4. cmpxchg - $500 5. DeadOfKnight - $400 6. danny e. - $375
7. the - $360 8. rbattle - $350 9. codinghorror - $326
10. Ryu Connor - $325
Custom-cooled Radeon R9 290X cards from Asus and XFX reviewedMore fans and pipes than a Phish concert 73
AMD's Radeon R9 295 X2 graphics card reviewedHawaii is surrounded by water, right? 251
A closer look at DirectX 12...or, rather, at Direct3D 12 114
Nvidia's GeForce GTX 750 Ti 'Maxwell' graphics processor...takes on the Radeon R7 265 and friends 202
A quick look at Mantle on AMD's Kaveri APUPushin' it to the limit 119
First look: AMD Mantle CPU performance in Battlefield 4A new frontier for PC gaming? 340
AMD's A8-7600 'Kaveri' processor reviewedBetter graphics, bigger contrasts 448
A first look at Nvidia's G-Sync display techWe lean too far toward the screen, fall in, and don't want to come out 204