Single page Print

Conclusions
Although Native Command Queuing is most definitely an elegant and intelligent way to minimize the impact of a hard drive's mechanical latency, our test results show that better performance certainly isn't guaranteed with the Barracuda 7200.7 NCQ and Promise's FastTrak TX4200. The best applications for NCQ are undoubtedly the kinds of multi-user environments that IOMeter simulates. With an increasing number of concurrent I/O requests to read or write data from different areas of a disk, command queuing's optimized request rescheduling really shines. NCQ also scales better with lower I/O loads than Western Digital's Tagged Command Queuing, whose CPU utilization is also much, much higher.

Unfortunately, IOMeter is about the only place where NCQ seems to help the Barracuda 7200.7. In fact, command queuing actually hurts the drive's performance in typical single-user applications, sometimes by a significant margin. Trying to pin down why NCQ slows the Barracuda down in some tests is more difficult, although the Raptor with TCQ is also plagued by poor single-user performance, so overhead associated with the Promise FastTrak TX 4200 controller may be the culprit.

At the end of the day, Native Command Queuing is undoubtedly The Right Thing to do. It's clearly a winner for servers that face multi-user loads, but the implementations we tested need to mature before they become attractive alternatives for single-user desktops. Given that it's entrenched in the Serial ATA II spec, we'll be seeing a lot more of Native Command Queuing moving forward. I can only hope that the next generation of drives and SATA controllers will, across the board, at least be no slower with NCQ than they are without. 

Like what we're doing? Pay what you want to support TR and get nifty extra features.
Top contributors
1. GKey13 - $650 2. JohnC - $600 3. davidbowser - $501
4. cmpxchg - $500 5. DeadOfKnight - $400 6. danny e. - $375
7. the - $360 8. rbattle - $350 9. codinghorror - $326
10. Ryu Connor - $325
Behind the scenes with Intel's SSD divisionA look at reliability, validation, and frickin' particle accelerators 52
TR's April 2014 peripheral staff picksOur new companion to the TR System Guide 89
Adata's Premier Pro SP920 solid-state drive reviewedA rose by another name? 27
Crucial's M550 solid-state drive reviewedA bigger, faster M500 33
Intel's 730 Series solid-state drive reviewedAn overclocked enterprise SSD for enthusiasts 68
The SSD Endurance Experiment: Data retention after 600TBA three-week reprieve from the onslaught 100
The SSD Endurance Experiment: 500TB updateHalfway to a petabyte 97
Clash of the terabyte titans: Crucial M500 960GB vs. Samsung 840 EVO 1TBThe best values at the top of the market 71