The move was a radical conversion and a stunning act of agility from a company so large and so invested in long-range planning. Judging by the results, however, it seems to have worked. The Pentium Extreme Edition 840 has arrived roughly one year after news broke of Intel's big shift in direction, the first fruits of the new era of parallelism.
The first thing you may notice about the Pentium Extreme Edition 840 is the name, which conspicuously does not include the words "Pentium" and "4" arranged together back to back. Intel has revamped its naming scheme for its dual-core chips, despite the fact that the Extreme Edition 840 packs a thoroughly Pentium 4 heritage.
In fact, this dual-core chip, code-named "Smithfield," is actually a pair of Pentium 4 "Prescott" cores situated together on a single piece of silicon. Each core has 1MB of L2 cache onboard, and the two cores share an 800MHz front-side bus. Beyond the Siamese twins action, there's very little to differentiate these chips from the latest Pentium 4 processors like the 600 series. Like those chips, Smithfield features support for Intel's EM64T extensions for 64-bit computing, and it can save on power consumption via the one-two punch of an enhanced halt state and SpeedStep power management.
Smithfield is also manufactured using the same basic 90nm fabrication process as current Pentium 4 chips. However, it's roughly twice the size of the Prescott core at 230 million transistors and 206 mm2 of die space. Heck, have a look at a picture of the Smithfield die, and you'll know instantly what's up.
I swear I did not make this up in a paint program. Smithfield really is two Prescott cores side by side.
For starters, Intel will be selling four versions of Smithfield, and the version we're reviewing today is the highest end product. The Extreme Edition 840 is clocked at 3.2GHz and has Intel's Hyper-Threading technology enabled. If you pay the premium for the Extreme Edition, you get the extra coolness factor of seeing four CPU utilization graphs charted in Task Manager or your CPU monitor of choice. The more pedestrian versions of Smithfield will be dubbed the Pentium D, and they will not include Hyper-Threading support. Here's how the whole product line shapes up:
|Pentium D 820||2.8GHz||No||$241|
|Pentium D 830||3.0GHz||No||$316|
|Pentium D 840||3.2GHz||No||$530|
|Pentium Extreme Edition 840||3.2GHz||Yes||$999|
Prices will range from $999 for the Extreme Edition 840 to as low as $241 for the Pentium D 820, although pricing on the Pentium D processors isn't yet 100% official. Obviously, with these kinds of prices, Intel is dead serious about pushing deep into the desktop PC market with dual-core products right away.
I am a little perplexed about the choice of Hyper-Threading as a means of setting apart the Extreme Edition from the regular Pentium D. Yes, I understand that Intel needs something to make its flagship processor special, but Hyper-Threading offers decent performance gains, sometimes of up to 50%, through thread-level parallelism precisely at a time when Intel is pushing the industry heavily in that direction. Disabling Hyper-Threading for the vast majority of Smithfield-based chips out there, which will be Pentium D processors, seems like a drastic measure. We've generally accepted Hyper-Threading as a Good Thing on the Pentium 4 and would hate to see it go.
With this concern in mind, I asked Intel whether there wasn't some ulterior motive involved in this choice beyond product segmentation. To my surprise, their answer was no. Apparently, this capability will lie dormant in most of the world's Smithfield-based processors in order to keep the Extreme Edition looking, er, extreme.
|Battlefield Hardline open beta scheduled for February 3||17|
|You can now unlock your Chromebook with your phone||5|
|Deal of the week: A Radeon R9 290X for $233||88|
|AMD's new Fixer video is even crazier than the last||76|
|Leak pegs desktop Broadwell, Skylake for mid-year||49|
|WSJ: Microsoft to back Cyanogen with $70M investment||53|
|You've goat to check out Silicon Power's new thumb drive||54|
|We discuss the GeForce GTX 970 memory controversy||71|
|nvidia already released an official response: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spZJrsssPA0||+64|