While the XtremeMusic's reasonable price tag has made it our favorite X-Fi, the card doesn't offer much in the way of extra I/O ports. It also lacks X-RAM—onboard memory that can be used by the X-Fi audio processor to store additional voices and higher quality audio assets. Creative claims X-RAM can ultimately improve gaming performance. Fortunately, both X-RAM and additional I/O ports are available on the X-Fi Fatal1ty, with a red LED riding shotgun, of course.
To explore the X-Fi's potential with X-RAM onboard and a collection of extra I/O ports at its disposal, we've cornered an X-Fi Fatal1ty for testing. Read on to see if it can match the XtremeMusic's impeccable audio qualityand whether X-RAM makes a difference in the games that support it.
X-Fi and X-RAM
Before we continue, I strongly suggest you read our original review of the X-Fi audio processor. Our initial coverage of the chip delves into the X-Fi's flexible audio ring architecture, 24-bit Crystalizer, CMSS-3D, playback modes, and Creative's bundled software. That discussion applies to the X-Fi Fatal1ty, which shares the same audio processor, software, and capabilities as the rest of the X-Fi lineup. The Fatal1ty does bring a couple of extra bells and whistles to the table, though. Among them is support for onboard memory that Creative has dubbed X-RAM.
X-RAM may be a fancy new marketing moniker, but onboard sound card memory isn't exactly a novel idea. After all, Creative's own AWE32 was available with between two and eight megabytes of onboard memory years ago. Creative insists that X-RAM is different, though, because it's there explicitly for use by applications. Developers are free to exploit X-RAM as they see fit, and Creative hopes they'll use it to cache uncompressed audio. Doing so could save CPU cycles and improve in-game frame rates, especially when developers take advantage of the X-Fi's support for 128 simultaneous hardware voices. Creative also likes to talk about how caching uncompressed audio with X-RAM can free up system memory, but with current X-RAM implementations packing only 64MB onboard, that's not saving you much.
To illustrate X-RAM's performance potential, Creative modified Unreal Tournament 2004's audio engine increase the number of simultaneous hardware voices and support X-RAM. This updated Unreal Tournament build was originally going to be made available to X-Fi owners, although when we asked for a copy, Creative indicated that it was no longer planning to make the build public. Since we couldn't get our hands on the build for testing, we have to rely on the results Creative details in its X-Fi reviewer's guide.
Creative's tests contrast Unreal Tournament 2004 performance with "basic" audio, which decompresses audio streams on the fly, and with X-RAM caching uncompressed audio. The results speak for themselves, as X-RAM enables higher frame rates with both 10 and 30 simultaneous voices. Note that the performance drop from 10 to 30 voices is much less significant with X-RAM caching uncompressed audio, as well. Of course, considering that these tests were conducted by Creative using a special build of the Unreal Tournament engine that won't be publicly released, they may represent a best-case scenario for X-RAM's performance impact.
In addition to caching standard, uncompressed audio, X-RAM can be used to store higher quality audio samples that would have been infeasible to stream from the hard drive or decompress on the fly. That could allow developers to finally bring high-definition audio to games, since the X-Fi supports 24-bit/96kHz audio for all 128 of its hardware voices.
As with many new features, developers must specifically target X-RAM to reap any benefits that the onboard memory can provide. Two publicly available games already do this, with Battlefield 2 and Quake 4 using X-RAM to cache in-game audio. Creative says X-RAM support is coming in more upcoming titles, as well, although we have to wonder just how willing developers will be to dedicate resources to exploiting a feature that has such little market penetration. X-RAM is currently only available on the X-Fi Fatal1ty and Elite Pro, which cost upwards of $250 and $330, respectively. Considering their price tags, it's unlikely that X-RAM support will reach a critical mass among gamers and enthusiasts any time soon.
|Intel enjoys healthy revenue and profits for Q1 2017||9|
|Acer Predator X27 and Predator Z271UV displays report in||8|
|Razer Lancehead wireless mouse is ready to stalk its prey||4|
|Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work Day Shortbread||12|
|Intel document confirms that Xeons will come in Gold and Platinum||30|
|Noctua confirms LGA 2066 will host Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X||7|
|Radeon 17.4.4 drivers rise for Dawn of War III||14|
|AMD ships Ryzen Balanced power plan with latest chipset drivers||10|
|Amazon's Echo Look uses machine learning to dress you up||32|
|Unless Intel suddenly becomes very aggressive in its pricing, a Skylake-X will certainly cost a hell of a lot more than Ryzen CPU. And who cares if AM...||+57|