Waco wrote:It's doable, but it totally depends on the task, the level of skill of the implementor, and level of fidelity required for a given task.
Captain Ned wrote:Absinthe would be similarly interesting.
Glorious wrote:There's little-to-no-reason to believe any of it, and it'll be interesting to see how Bloomberg reacts to this.
Redocbew wrote:1.1GB encoded in 11 minutes and change. Extending that to a total data set of several terabytes means the entire job will not take days, but months.
There's a lot of room for error there, but yeah... that's a big job.