It is here folks, you can finally sleep easy at night knowing your wall can now match your PC,keyboard, and mouse.
https://www.cnet.com/news/nanoleaf-want ... our-walls/
Personal computing discussed
Moderators: askfranklin, renee, emkubed, Captain Ned
the wrote:Too low of resolution.
If you had the money and power, it is perfectly possible to use 0.7 mm pixel pitch LED to create a really immersive room.
ludi wrote:the wrote:Too low of resolution.
If you had the money and power, it is perfectly possible to use 0.7 mm pixel pitch LED to create a really immersive room.
You only need a 256x240 grid for a NES emulator.
the wrote:Pretty good for consumer. The real benefit is if they figured out how to economically scale the backend tile systems to permit even larger displays.
ludi wrote:the wrote:Pretty good for consumer. The real benefit is if they figured out how to economically scale the backend tile systems to permit even larger displays.
To me that looks like a usual CES one-off. The tech will enter the consumer space eventually but right now it's going to be pricey.
the wrote:ludi wrote:the wrote:Pretty good for consumer. The real benefit is if they figured out how to economically scale the backend tile systems to permit even larger displays.
To me that looks like a usual CES one-off. The tech will enter the consumer space eventually but right now it's going to be pricey.
The tech has been out there for awhile on the commercial side but due to its extremely pricey nature has remained exclusively there. Samsung is attempting to shoe horn it into the consumer/residential side of things which they'd need to lower prices by an order of magnitude. Pricing can be as high as $45,000 per square meter of display area on the commercial side (for reference, a 65 in diagonal TV has an area of ~1.16 m^2). Reducing costs to 1/10th the current rate would be equivalent to a $5,200 for a 65" diagonal TV. Not cheap by any means, especially for the low resolution, but there is room to scale up size and resolution indefinitely.