But when your stance is "There's nothing wrong with Metformin and there's plenty of scientific data to back that up!", completely opposite to what I propose
You just proposed, in your immediately previous back-to-back post, that Metformin could cause liver cancer.
taking Metformin might result in complications later in life, like reduced liver function or even liver cancer.
Your argument wasn't "let's talk about the core issue", you argument was ignorant make-believe: Metformin is actually highly associated with a decrease in the risk of liver cancer.
"Attack the core issue. Remove fat from the body by following a strict diet for 15 days minimum", how can we ever see eye to eye on this issue?
We can't, because you're not even talking about the "core issue", you're just inventing lies about Metformin.
It's like two shopkeepers shouting their lungs out in the village market to sell their products.
I'm not selling anything, I've told you repeatedly that the preferential treatment for incipient type II diabetes isn't any sort of pill at all, but rather diet & lifestyle changes. I'm simply counteracting your lies: you aren't just saying diet is better, no, you are saying there is some evil medical conspiracy.
There isn't. The medical establishment recommends dietary changes, they've been screaming about it for decades.
But it isn't some fad diet, some "15 day and done" magical panacea, but rather a necessary commitment that a patient has to accept reality and realize their body can't handle how they've been treating it.
There's eminent reason to believe that "purge" style dieting results in "binge-purge" cycling, which confounds the necessary changes and might even have stand-alone detrimental health effects.
There's no "one weird trick", OK? And when you were previously advocating "Kempner's one weird trick" without bothering to tell anyone that you fundamentally reworked the entire diet (which is literally 75%-80% granulated sugar, literally a pound a day, this is straight from the link *YOU* cited), that's just ridiculous.You have no credibility. You didn't even read the link you told everyone else to read because you claimed it had all the answers.
IT LITERALLY DOESN'T MATTER WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, WHEN THE FORMS AND PATTERNS OF HOW YOU SAY IT ARE NOT ONLY CONTRADICTIONS, LIES, BUT THE DEMAND THAT WE READ YOUR *MIND* AND DISCERN WHAT YOU'RE THINKING RATHER THAN WHAT YOU FACTUALLY SAID.
That is why you are being ridiculed with quacking, because that's what you are doing: You admitted your words and thought process are unreliable and non-indicative of humanly-discernable reasoning: It's just nonsense, empty sounds that have a secret meaning known only to you, not to the people who supposedly share your language.
To the extent that you ever say anything right, it's just pareidolia in your white noise of words.