Personal computing discussed

Moderators: Captain Ned, emkubed

 
clone
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:40 am

Re: New 2014 Jeep Cherokee design - hot or not?

Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:43 pm

.
Last edited by clone on Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:05 pm, edited 4 times in total.
neg
 
TheEmrys
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2323
Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 8:22 pm
Location: Northern Colorado
Contact:

Re: New 2014 Jeep Cherokee design - hot or not?

Sun Mar 03, 2013 2:09 pm

MadManOriginal wrote:
TheEmrys wrote:
This new Jeep is just like all four-door Jeep's - its a family car for guys who want to cling to some illusion of machismo that they probably never had, but always aspired to. This vehicle is a great option for skiers, campers, and the urban folk who like to feel "outdoorsy."


You mean like pretty much every SUV ?


Well, it is the original SUV.
Sony a7II
Sony Zeiss 55/1.8
Minolta 100/2, 28-135/4-4.5, 17-35 D
Minolta MC 50/1.4, MD 35-70/3.5, 300/4.5
 
Turkina
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Philly

Re: New 2014 Jeep Cherokee design - hot or not?

Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:19 pm

With respect to CUVs, I'd like to put in a plug for my Kia Sportage AWD SX. It uses the 2.0T engine also found in the Optima SX and Sonata Turbo, in this implementation putting out 260 hp and 269 ft-lbs of torque. I've found that it has plenty of power. Turbo I4s are the new V6s. In terms of design, it looks similar to the Audi Q5/Q7 because the former Audi design chief (Peter Schreyer ) now works for Kia, but costs (far) less money, gets better fuel economy, doesn't need premium gas, and has a more powerful engine. The Audi has a more refined driving feel, but that's about it. With respect to reliability I figured at least the Kia has a better warranty and would be cheaper to fix if anything went wrong.
They actually issued refunds for advertising higher MPG than EPA tested (I got $150 back...), but my car was rated at 20/26 and I've been getting 28-31 on the highway pretty easily (18-21 in Boston traffic).
 
jss21382
Gerbil Jedi
Posts: 1654
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 8:20 am
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Contact:

Re: New 2014 Jeep Cherokee design - hot or not?

Sun Mar 03, 2013 5:05 pm

Turkina wrote:
With respect to reliability I figured at least the Kia has a better warranty and would be cheaper to fix if anything went wrong.


Cheaper than an Audi, but more than it's brother on the same platform, the Hyundai Tucson. While Kia is a division of Hyundai, the same exact parts cost a fair bit more when they come in a Kia box, gotta love it, you can chose to pay more up front or more in service!
X2 3800+ @ 2.3, 2GB Mushkin pc3200, Lanparty Ultra-D, X850XT @ 560/585
 
clone
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:40 am

Re: New 2014 Jeep Cherokee design - hot or not?

Sun Mar 03, 2013 5:51 pm

.
Last edited by clone on Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
neg
 
Turkina
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Philly

Re: New 2014 Jeep Cherokee design - hot or not?

Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:39 pm

jss21382 wrote:
Cheaper than an Audi, but more than it's brother on the same platform, the Hyundai Tucson. While Kia is a division of Hyundai, the same exact parts cost a fair bit more when they come in a Kia box, gotta love it, you can chose to pay more up front or more in service!


Yeah, that figures - although the Tucscon wasn't an option since they don't offer it with the 2.0T. Most CUVs have crappy underpowered engines on heavier vehicles so they have worse performance and worse fuel economy than a comparable sedan.
 
Captain Ned
Gold subscriber
Global Moderator
Posts: 23845
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA

Re: New 2014 Jeep Cherokee design - hot or not?

Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:43 pm

Turkina wrote:
Yeah, that figures - although the Tucscon wasn't an option since they don't offer it with the 2.0T. Most CUVs have crappy underpowered engines on heavier vehicles so they have worse performance and worse fuel economy than a comparable sedan.

About to replace the wife's '07 CR-V with a 2014 Forester. New design, but the non-turbo is the same 2.5L they've always run so I'm comfortable with that. I'd prefer the turbo, but every one I see in inventory has every single option box checked adding about $4K in useless expense. Since it's a new model and they need to flood the lots, methinks a special order (it'd be my 4th Subaru from the same dealer, so I know I can get it done) might take a few months.
Build a man a fire and he's warm for the night. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
 
JohnC
Gerbil Jedi
Topic Author
Posts: 1890
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:08 pm
Location: NY/NJ/FL

Re: New 2014 Jeep Cherokee design - hot or not?

Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:45 pm

Captain Ned wrote:
Turkina wrote:
Yeah, that figures - although the Tucscon wasn't an option since they don't offer it with the 2.0T. Most CUVs have crappy underpowered engines on heavier vehicles so they have worse performance and worse fuel economy than a comparable sedan.

About to replace the wife's '07 CR-V with a 2014 Forester. New design, but the non-turbo is the same 2.5L they've always run so I'm comfortable with that. I'd prefer the turbo, but every one I see in inventory has every single option box checked adding about $4K in useless expense. Since it's a new model and they need to flood the lots, methinks a special order (it'd be my 4th Subaru from the same dealer, so I know I can get it done) might take a few months.

I'd rather wait for the "custom order" model with exact features you want to. All of our current family cars have the exact features we want and no useless crap (for example, there are no "running boards" on both our SUVs) that we don't... The longest time we had to wait was a couple of months. Of course, they were not from Subaru, so that's probably why...
My subscription allows you people to exist on this site and makes me a better human being than you'll ever be

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest