End User wrote:Does anyone else in this thread know that?
The point is that you completely don't understand what it means.
End User wrote:My point is that Apple has a great deal of experience under its belt when it comes to hardware transitions.
NO ONE DISAGREES WITH YOU.
This is back to "I MAINTAIN THE SUN IS REAL". It doesn't undo the rest of your endless nonsense.
End User wrote:The Mac OS X transition from PPC to Intel was a great success. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple were to do something similar if they were to transition macOS from Intel to ARM.
Yes, the sun is real.
What does that have to do with your previous contention that "the Moon is a ridiculous liberal myth"?
End User wrote:Apple may or may not:
- have macOS running on ARM hardware in their labs
- have an internal build of Xcode that has the option to create macOS apps which provide "Universal Binaries" for both Intel and ARM hardware
- have a Rosetta like dynamic translation layer to allow many Intel applications to run on ARM based Mac hardware without modification (obvious potential for a performance penalty)
I believe, WITHOUT HESITATION, that this is not only true now, but that it has been true for quite some time.
I have been saying this, over and over, for a very long time as well.
To the best of my knowledge, no one here has *EVER* unconditionally disputed this. If I am wrong, and it has happened, it is extremely rare and likely not even remotely recent. And I can point to scores and scores of posts BY THE PEOPLE WHO CONTEST YOU, who either do not deny it, or flatly agree with it.
Such as my case, because I bluntly state that I believe this is true without any qualification whatsoever.
EDIT: In fact, I have every reason to believe that I've actually been saying this longer than you have.
End User wrote:When Apple releases their first macOS on ARM hardware I'm going to be dancing all night long.
About what?
Are you Apple?
In what way is this your success, and in what way does their success even positively impact you? Can you explain this?
Every day at work I use four completely different computer architectures for general purpose computing (and I'm not even including all the non-general purpose stuff...). That is, I routinely have terminal sessions on all four and regularly have to do something on each.
Do you know how much that typically matters, at all?
idk,
once a month? Possibly less?And I develop stuff.
I'm not using
multi-platform applications on a COMPLETELY non-developer, entirely consumer-centric, device.
It barely matters to me.
why on earth does it matter to you?