Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, Flying Fox, morphine
f0d wrote:https://www.techspot.com/review/1871-amd-ryzen-3600/i think im going back to Intel and getting a 9600k
Steven Walton wrote:Ryzen 5 3600 offers a tremendous value. It smoked the Core i5-9600K in every single application benchmark we ran and worst case matches its single core performance. You get 12 threads opposed to just 6, so it’s no doubt going to age better, but this time you don’t have to roll the dice on Ryzen's longevity, as it’s already faster today.
Bonusbartus wrote:enixenigma linked the answer to that in a post on the first page of this thread.Does anyone have a clue about what is going on with the AIDA Memory bandwidth results? The Ryzen 3 3700X has a very low write bandwidth.
JustAnEngineer wrote:Bonusbartus wrote:enixenigma linked the answer to that in a post on the first page of this thread.Does anyone have a clue about what is going on with the AIDA Memory bandwidth results? The Ryzen 3 3700X has a very low write bandwidth.
Bonusbartus wrote:I am not sure however how it would be possible to get a copy bandwith higher than the write bandwidth?
Copy == (read then write) right?
Waco wrote:There's definitely something weird about that particular test with many CPUs - it's not uncommon for copy bandwidth to report higher than either read OR write.
synthtel2 wrote:50 GB/s on a memory copy bandwidth test conventionally means 25 read and 25 write, not 50 and 50. Think max achievable bandwidth, not actual copy rate; copy is just the access pattern.
synthtel2 wrote:50 GB/s on a memory copy bandwidth test conventionally means 25 read and 25 write, not 50 and 50. Think max achievable bandwidth, not actual copy rate; copy is just the access pattern.
JustAnEngineer wrote:f0d wrote:https://www.techspot.com/review/1871-amd-ryzen-3600/i think im going back to Intel and getting a 9600kSteven Walton wrote:Ryzen 5 3600 offers a tremendous value. It smoked the Core i5-9600K in every single application benchmark we ran and worst case matches its single core performance. You get 12 threads opposed to just 6, so it’s no doubt going to age better, but this time you don’t have to roll the dice on Ryzen's longevity, as it’s already faster today.
Waco wrote:Same here - dropped a 3900X into an X570 Gaming X and it booted first time
chuckula wrote:Waco wrote:Same here - dropped a 3900X into an X570 Gaming X and it booted first time
We're cancelling another product in the face of that kind of performance!
Waco wrote:chuckula wrote:Waco wrote:Same here - dropped a 3900X into an X570 Gaming X and it booted first time
We're cancelling another product in the face of that kind of performance!
Given that I managed to spill water on the board in the removal of my waterblock...I was pretty happy with it (I dried it out, obviously). I'm seeing sustained clocks even on the Wraith cooler above the base clock by a few hundred MHz when encoding x265. Under water I expect it'll be pretty happy once the mount shows up.