AMD takes a page from Intel’s book:
https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-9-3900xt ... confirmed/
Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, Flying Fox, morphine
meerkt wrote:I want 10GHz. Even 6GHz would be a good start. Where's post-silicon?
blastdoor wrote:meerkt wrote:I want 10GHz. Even 6GHz would be a good start. Where's post-silicon?
Apparently that happened back in 2005, but I somehow missed it:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/680/6
meerkt wrote:8-10GHz on 70nm? Nice.
Ah! The heady days of Pentium 3-4...
blastdoor wrote:Hardly seems worth it...
blastdoor wrote:https://www.anandtech.com/show/15854/amd-ryzen-3000-xt-cpus-zen-2-more-mhz
Weaker than expected. No change in base clocks, tiny change in boost.
Hardly seems worth it...
Aranarth wrote:blastdoor wrote:https://www.anandtech.com/show/15854/amd-ryzen-3000-xt-cpus-zen-2-more-mhz
Weaker than expected. No change in base clocks, tiny change in boost.
Hardly seems worth it...
I'm going to wait for benchmarks.
If the all core boost has a major improvement then this is still worth it even if single core boost has a minor improvment.