https://www.anandtech.com/show/16535/in ... ocket-lake
Best feature — you might actually be able to buy it.
Downside — you probably won’t want to buy it.
Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, Flying Fox, morphine
Wirko wrote:Looking at the benchmarks and nothing else, one must think that the 11700K is the 10700K with a couple optimisations and AVX-512. Are there ANY reasons to believe there's a new microarchitecture hiding within, until good guys with X-ray machines and small chainsaws pick the thing apart?
Waco wrote:Sure, you're right, I just made it up and my post was based on imaginary experience.
/s
K-L-Waster wrote:Intel can lose their lead in server just like IBM did -- but also just like IBM, if they do lose it they will lose it sloooowwwwwlllyyyyy.
Krogoth wrote:Waco wrote:Sure, you're right, I just made it up and my post was based on imaginary experience.
/s
IIRC, you work in the government sector what happens there doesn't necessary apply to the private sector and vice versa. I have read a number of stories that IT Admins and departments getting burnt by Meltdown/Spectre fiasco when it went down hard. That's something doesn't go away overnight. It put a hard dent into "Nobody got fired for using Intel" mindset.
Waco wrote:Krogoth wrote:Waco wrote:Sure, you're right, I just made it up and my post was based on imaginary experience.
/s
IIRC, you work in the government sector what happens there doesn't necessary apply to the private sector and vice versa. I have read a number of stories that IT Admins and departments getting burnt by Meltdown/Spectre fiasco when it went down hard. That's something doesn't go away overnight. It put a hard dent into "Nobody got fired for using Intel" mindset.
I think you're very happily ignoring what I said in my original post.
Despite everything that has happened it still holds true. It took 20 years for the IBM mantra to fade. Intel isn't gone in 5.
Krogoth wrote:K-L-Waster wrote:Intel can lose their lead in server just like IBM did -- but also just like IBM, if they do lose it they will lose it sloooowwwwwlllyyyyy.
Unless, Intel is able to make a significant turn-around soon. It'll happen sooner then you would expect. It isn't just AMD either. You got Apple and ARM trying to make headways in these markets.
K-L-Waster wrote:It is done much more quicker when favored-vendor has a serious fault that has costed the organization millions in lost revenue through downtime and performance loss.Krogoth wrote:K-L-Waster wrote:Intel can lose their lead in server just like IBM did -- but also just like IBM, if they do lose it they will lose it sloooowwwwwlllyyyyy.
Unless, Intel is able to make a significant turn-around soon. It'll happen sooner then you would expect. It isn't just AMD either. You got Apple and ARM trying to make headways in these markets.
I think you're underestimating the effect of organizational inertia. Getting Finance Departments to change favoured-vendor status is no simple task....