Also, besides power consumption (which i am reluctant to believe) the results don't mean much to me.
nVidia video drivers FAIL, click for more info Disclaimer: All answers and suggestions are provided by an enthusiastic amateur and are therefore without warranty either explicit or implicit. Basically you use my suggestions at your own risk.
That's an incredibly small number of benchmarks, cherry picked to be the few examples where AMD is at their strongest.
Whilst they (whoever the source may be) is trying to paint a pretty picture, what I can't help noticing is the lack of significant improvement in IPC. The Piledriver is marginally better than the bulldozer, but not out of line with what I'd expect if the Bulldozer was clocked up to 4.2GHz.
Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.
Well... as Chrispy_ pointed out, they're roughly what you'd expect given that they appear to have been cherry-picked to play to Bulldozer's/Piledriver's strengths. So yeah, they're unsourced; but they're certainly plausible.
If the world isn't making sense to you, you're either drinking too much or not drinking enough.