Personal computing discussed

Moderator: Captain Ned

 
Captain Ned
Gold subscriber
Global Moderator
Posts: 25609
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA

Re: Match these speakers to a receiver

Wed May 17, 2017 10:30 pm

Waco wrote:
Most modern amps are pretty darn good, though.

Probably, but I've spent my 35+ years in the audio pursuits looking for products like the original 3020. The products that punch FAR above their price tags, mainly because they were designed by an individual or team of individuals, rather than just using any-old circuit design out of a book. It's how I've come to the rather eclectic rig I now own, most of which I've bought used from Audiogon or traded for locally.

I will also confess to being a Stereophile reader since 1986 and thus have a touch of the nervosa.
If the Earth were flat, cats would have pushed everything off of it by now.
 
Waco
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Jedi
Posts: 1752
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Los Alamos, NM

Re: Match these speakers to a receiver

Wed May 17, 2017 10:40 pm

Captain Ned wrote:
Waco wrote:
Most modern amps are pretty darn good, though.

Probably, but I've spent my 35+ years in the audio pursuits looking for products like the original 3020. The products that punch FAR above their price tags, mainly because they were designed by an individual or team of individuals, rather than just using any-old circuit design out of a book. It's how I've come to the rather eclectic rig I now own, most of which I've bought used from Audiogon or traded for locally.

I will also confess to being a Stereophile reader since 1986 and thus have a touch of the nervosa.

Ha, I hear ya. When I think audiophile, two things come to mind...those who use their ears, and that article. :lol:
Z170A Gaming Pro Carbon | 6700K @ 4.5 | 16 GB | GTX Titan X | Seasonix Gold 850 | XSPC RX360 | Heatkiller R3 | D5 + RP-452X2 | Cosmos II | 480 + 240 + LSI 9207-8i (128x8) SSDs
 
Captain Ned
Gold subscriber
Global Moderator
Posts: 25609
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA

Re: Match these speakers to a receiver

Wed May 17, 2017 11:04 pm

Waco wrote:
When I think audiophile, two things come to mind...those who use their ears, and that article. :lol:

I'm a rhythm 'n' pace guy. It needs to get my toes a-tappin'. Since I rarely listen to orchestral music, I have no need for soundstaging, image depth, and all of the other associated things the hardcore nervosa bleat on about into the mega-buck range, nor do I have a room of the size and expanse needed to make soundstaging work properly (the rule of thirds essentially means a listening room no smaller than 30' x 40' for large full-range 20Hz-capable speakers). That's for the Powerball house. I do, though, want the lows to be there (but not WAY TOO MUCH like the bondo-rattlers on the roads), and I'd prefer timbral accuracy as well. I don't have perfect pitch, but I've listened to many of my favorites so many times that if the pitch accuracy isn't right, I immediately notice it. I also notice if pitch relations aren't right.
If the Earth were flat, cats would have pushed everything off of it by now.
 
Waco
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Jedi
Posts: 1752
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Los Alamos, NM

Re: Match these speakers to a receiver

Thu May 18, 2017 10:18 am

I'm in the same camp, really, but with more varied tastes (I do enjoy classical/orchestral scores). I don't care much for perfect soundstage, imaging, etc as long as it's not horrendous. Distortion and power compression I notice pretty quickly and ruin my enjoyment.
Z170A Gaming Pro Carbon | 6700K @ 4.5 | 16 GB | GTX Titan X | Seasonix Gold 850 | XSPC RX360 | Heatkiller R3 | D5 + RP-452X2 | Cosmos II | 480 + 240 + LSI 9207-8i (128x8) SSDs
 
Vhalidictes
Graphmaster Gerbil
Posts: 1098
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 2:32 pm
Location: Paragon City, RI

Re: Match these speakers to a receiver

Thu May 18, 2017 10:24 am

Waco wrote:
I'm in the same camp, really, but with more varied tastes (I do enjoy classical/orchestral scores). I don't care much for perfect soundstage, imaging, etc as long as it's not horrendous. Distortion and power compression I notice pretty quickly and ruin my enjoyment.


I think it really depends on the recording. I thought that soundstaging was bunk (I got the concept, I just thought it had no real-world application), but a friend's setup and a SACD recordings changed my mind a bit - it can be important but the mastering matters.

He liked classical music and on his 5.1 setup you could actually tell the spacial separation between instruments. I connected my phone to his setup and played some stereo 320Kbit MP3's and... nothing. They sounded nice but you could really tell that his setup did nothing special for it.
I have never understood the mindset of folks who are very hostile to science and progress and yet still use the products produced by the use of science, and still live in a modern society as well.
 
ludi
Emperor Gerbilius I
Posts: 6911
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 10:47 pm
Location: Sunny Colorado front range

Re: Match these speakers to a receiver

Thu May 18, 2017 10:42 am

HERETIC wrote:
Ever since we started using Mosfet outputs in our amps the quality of sound from our amps has continued to improve.

Usually there are only MOSFETs in the output stage of a Class D amplifier, which is a switchmode device and those can have other issues if the output filter is designed incorrectly. There a couple esoteric designs using lateral FETs which do make for a very good linear amplifier, but those aren't common. A majority of receiver-type amplifiers out there still use traditional BJTs. Like everything else that depends on advances in materials science, transistor quality has become very good in the past 25 years, and even a mass-produced cheap amplifier can have very good sound quality.

In modern gear, the worst offenders for sound quality are often the cheap "T-amps" and other ultra-compact designs that rely on budget Class D or single-chip amplifiers originally developed for automotive applications, but most people don't run those hard enough to notice (desktop) or can't tell due to a noisy listening environment (car cabin).
Abacus Model 2.5 | Quad-Row FX with 256 Cherry Red Slider Beads | Applewood Frame | Water Cooling by Brita Filtration
 
Waco
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Jedi
Posts: 1752
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Los Alamos, NM

Re: Match these speakers to a receiver

Thu May 18, 2017 12:39 pm

I love the little T amps for casual listening. A Lepai 2020a+ with an upgraded power brick can sing nicely if you're not listening to overly dynamic sources and your speakers are halfway efficient.

I had a larger T amp from Topping that would do an easy 80 WPC, but it exploded catastrophically after 2 years of relatively easy running powering a set of Advent Heritage towers. The little T chip exploded in a big gout of fire.
Z170A Gaming Pro Carbon | 6700K @ 4.5 | 16 GB | GTX Titan X | Seasonix Gold 850 | XSPC RX360 | Heatkiller R3 | D5 + RP-452X2 | Cosmos II | 480 + 240 + LSI 9207-8i (128x8) SSDs
 
cynan
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 979
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 2:30 pm

Re: Match these speakers to a receiver

Mon May 29, 2017 10:40 am

There's also Monoprice hybrid tube amps. This one is rated at 50w+ pc into 4 ohms. Should be enough power for the KEFs in the OP. These amps are currently 20% off ($160)...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: farmpuma and 13 guests