Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, mac_h8r1, Nemesis
BIF wrote:Nothing so far has indicated a memory problem in this case, and cold boots were done with warm components, about a week ago. Some would fail, but swapping power cables or plugging into a different outlet would allow the system to boot without enough time to cause components to cool down in any significant way. Plus, there was one night when I went to bed after shutting off the system. Cold boot in the morning failed anyway. So it has been successful AND unsuccessful both ways.
No, this particular problem does not (yet) seem to point to a memory issue or a temperature issue. If it does even in the slightest, I will run memtest first, before pulling any DIMMS (I have 8 ).
Geonerd wrote:Have you run Memtest at all? It's stupidly easy to do.
BIF wrote:Weird new behavior #2: When turning on the PSU power switch, the PC boots itself even before I can press the power button.
I'd like to start by just reseating all 8 to see if the system will reboot. Would it be helpful to clean the memory contacts, or should I avoid doing this?
BIF wrote:...so the "hammer test" has drawn 4 errors so far:
Test 13 has a note that "RAM may be vulnerable to high frequency row hammer bit flips", whatever that means. I don't know if this is a message about my ram, or any ram in general.
Here are the errors:
18F065D18 Expected 00000000 Actual 00000004 CPU 0
333024E0C Expected 00000000 Actual 00800000 CPU 0
7A742341C Expected 00000000 Actual 00800000 CPU 0
7CB824934 Expected 00000000 Actual 00100000 CPU 0
It's still running and it is 91% through pass 1 of 4. Is there any merit to letting it run further? Based on the addresses shown, it looks like 2 or 3 sticks are flagging here. How can I translate the addresses to tell me which sticks are pulling the errors?
Edit: I just realized that this test is still running. For some reason, it appears to be running right now against addresses LOWER than the 7A and 7C addresses shown above (it's in the 56's and 57's). Just curious, are these tests executed in a non-ascending way?
Starfalcon wrote:Have you checked for a new bios yet?
Version 4802
Description BIOS 4802 for P9X79 WS released to public.
1. Improve compatibility to some Gen 2/3 capture card and with some storage device.
2. Improve “Restore AC Power Loss” function in UEFI BIOS – APM section.
File Size 4.84 MBytes update 2015/07/17
BIF wrote:My motherboard has two features that may help me test.
1. I can boot from a USB stick, so should be able to remove all peripherals.
2. Can (I think) update the BIOS from a USB stick without processor (and maybe without memory) installed. I don't plan to update the BIOS because I have the latest one (1206 or something), but I can at least test the system with only motherboard connected to PSU.
Since I've decided to do at least "some" more testing, that "blog" will continue to happen in the other thread. It never hurts to plan for the worst, so ongoing discussion about potential new system parts will continue to go here.
I'll post an update soon.
Topinio wrote:Flashing the firmware on an unstable system is brave, IMO.
biffzinker wrote:Starfalcon wrote:Have you checked for a new bios yet?
I see this in the latest BIOS Update for his board,Version 4802
Description BIOS 4802 for P9X79 WS released to public.
1. Improve compatibility to some Gen 2/3 capture card and with some storage device.
2. Improve “Restore AC Power Loss” function in UEFI BIOS – APM section.
File Size 4.84 MBytes update 2015/07/17
ASUS P9X79 WS 4802
BIF wrote:My motherboard has two features that may help me test.
1. I can boot from a USB stick, so should be able to remove all peripherals.
2. Can (I think) update the BIOS from a USB stick without processor (and maybe without memory) installed. I don't plan to update the BIOS because I have the latest one (1206 or something), but I can at least test the system with only motherboard connected to PSU.
Since I've decided to do at least "some" more testing, that "blog" will continue to happen in the other thread. It never hurts to plan for the worst, so ongoing discussion about potential new system parts will continue to go here.
I'll post an update soon.
Topinio wrote:I'd first test if you can consistently get the motherboard+CPU to power on without anything else installed, even RAM, before trying USB boot. (On cardboard, after clean-up.)
Then if that works, USB boot to memtest86 is definitely good, to test the RAM one DIMM at a time.
Flashing the firmware on an unstable system is brave, IMO.
As you have no IGP you'll need a GPU for the USB boots, do you have a recent-ish low- and bus-powered known good one spare? (I keep one in the parts box for this scenario, currently a HD 5450.)
BIF wrote:I don't have a stock HSF. Can I hook up the H80i to the CPU and on-board power and USB and try to boot, even while the motherboard is "on cardboard"? If not, I'll have to source a HSF, and that could take days for delivery.