TR Forums

Part 1 of the Anandtech review is up (future part pending):

https://www.anandtech.com/show/12170/nv ... itanomachy

Obliterates the Titan Xp in over all frame rates but the 99th percentile is pretty close, possibly due to drivers or the fact that the ROP count is the same. Either way, performance is supremely good for a non-gaming, professional work card.

I heard reports about how an OC 8700K is already sort of bottlenecking a 1080 Ti, much less a Titan V.

Maybe at 720P and 1080P, perhaps 1440P as well... Doubtful many modern, well threaded games would at 4K though.

GV100 is ROP-limited just like Vega 10 and Fiji in gaming loads. It looks like there is going only be to small gains in architectural tweaks for gaming loads.

ultima_trev wrote:

Part 1 of the Anandtech review is up (future part pending):

https://www.anandtech.com/show/12170/nv ... itanomachy.

Wow, that hardware analysis was a great read. They really changed quite a lot on the underlying uArch, far more than I had realized.

Krogoth wrote:

GV100 is ROP-limited just like Vega 10 and Fiji in gaming loads. It looks like there is going only be to small gains in architectural tweaks for gaming loads.

Well the Titan V only has 96 of 128 ROPs enabled due to only 3 of 4 HBM stacks enabled. A Titan V vs. Quadro GP100 comparison would be interesting in this regard.

Kougar wrote:

ultima_trev wrote:

Part 1 of the Anandtech review is up (future part pending):

https://www.anandtech.com/show/12170/nv ... itanomachy.

Wow, that hardware analysis was a great read. They really changed quite a lot on the underlying uArch, far more than I had realized.

It is primarily revolved around general compute performance and functions though. It is no surprise that Nvidia wants a part of the crypto-currency pie in their the customer-tier SKUs.