Personal computing discussed

Moderators: morphine, SecretSquirrel

 
Welch
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Topic Author
Posts: 3579
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:58 am

So this just happened..

https://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-eul ... lowed/amp/

Thoughts? I realize they want to recoup their R&D but this seems like the **** possible way to do it. Perhaps an additional licensing fee would have been a better route. Not even surprised with Nvidia anymore.
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943

1600x | Strix B350-F | CM 240 Lite | 16GB 3200 | MSI 7850 | 850 EVO | Corsair 400R | Seasonic X 850 | Corsair M95 / K90 | Sennheiser PC37x
 
Ryu Connor
Gold subscriber
Global Moderator
Posts: 4321
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Marietta, GA
Contact:

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Tue Jan 02, 2018 5:09 am

Good for gamers. Should help make sure that the average consumer isn't competing with datacenters to get a GPU.

Good for shareholders. Should help the bottom line.

Good for the company. Volta V100 was supposedly a $3b chip. I don't see those kind of costs getting lower in the future.
All of my written content here on TR does not represent or reflect the views of my employer or any reasonable human being. All content and actions are my own.
 
the
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:26 am

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Tue Jan 02, 2018 5:48 am

Not really enforceable. More realistically it'll be an excuse for nVidia to provide support for data centers that have tried to snatch up Titan Vs for server usage.
Dual Opteron 6376, 96 GB DDR3, Asus KGPE-D16, GTX 970
Mac Pro Dual Xeon E5645, 48 GB DDR3, GTX 770
Core i7 3930K@4.2 Ghz, 32 GB DDR3, GA-X79-UP5-Wifi
Core i7 2600K@4.4 Ghz, 16 GB DDR3, GTX 970, GA-X68XP-UD4
 
NovusBogus
Silver subscriber
Graphmaster Gerbil
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 12:37 am

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:00 am

Agreed that legal thuggery is a terrible approach to market segmentation, but it should be noted that Quadro/Tesla basically *is* the 'business license fee' that you suggest. The blockchain exception is interesting, but I suppose they realize the hilariously low probability of actually making something like this stick against a Chinese mining cluster.

In any case, it should scare off the corporate drones but actually trying to enforce it beyond voiding warranties would lead to some quality entertainment given the nature of those who run very large GPU clusters.
 
Chrispy_
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4425
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Europe, most frequently London.

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:28 am

NovusBogus wrote:
the hilariously low probability of actually making something like this stick


And there lies the rub. Even if they do try to enforce it, the Quadros and Teslas have much of the shared driver and architecture as Geforces, so all a company with a technical issue needs to do is prove that the problem exists with ONE Quadro/Tesla.

I keep a Quadro and a Firepro on tap, just so that I can confirm any issues I'm seeing with Radeons and Geforces in the office fleet aren't driver-related. They never are, but on the very rare occasions I've had to invoke pro-level support from either AMD or Nvidia I have a valid serial number and hardware to liaise with them on the issue. I've even loaned another firm my WX9100 at the moment just so that they can prove to AMD that the issue happens on a Radeon Pro and that the issue is something that AMD and Autodesk need to resolve across their entire driver stack.
Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.
 
Krogoth
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Elder
Posts: 5475
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 3:20 pm
Location: somewhere on Core Prime
Contact:

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:33 am

They just don't want their customer-tier Volta SKUs cannibalizing their Telsa/Quadro sales. It is more evidence that Volta microarchitecture family is much more focused around general compute performance this time around.
Ivy Bridge i5-3570K@4.0Ghz, Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H, 2x4GiB of PC3-12800, Sapphire RX Vega 64, Corsair CX-600 and Fractal Refined R4 (W). Kentsfield Q6600@3Ghz, HD 4850 2x2GiB PC2-6400, Gigabyte EP45-DS4P, OCZ Modstream 700W, and PC-7B.
 
Kougar
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2253
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:12 am
Location: Texas

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Wed Jan 03, 2018 1:00 am

So does this apply to the Titan V's or not? I recall reading the Titan V still uses the Geforce driver line.
 
DancinJack
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Posts: 3989
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: Kansas

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Wed Jan 03, 2018 1:11 am

Kougar wrote:
So does this apply to the Titan V's or not? I recall reading the Titan V still uses the Geforce driver line.


I believe so. While it doesn't bear the Geforce name, it still uses the Geforce suite of driver rather than the Quadro stuff.
i7 6700K - Z170 - 16GiB DDR4 - GTX 1080 - 512GB SSD - 256GB SSD - 500GB SSD - 3TB HDD- 27" IPS G-sync - Win10 Pro x64 - Ubuntu/Mint x64 :: 2015 13" rMBP Sierra :: Canon EOS 80D/Sony RX100
 
Duct Tape Dude
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 703
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 12:37 pm

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Wed Jan 03, 2018 1:33 am

This feels like first-amendment violations of a computer processor. There's no way this will be enforceable.

To skirt around this limitation, what's stopping someone from bootstrapping their existing code with a single call to git or some other blockchain tech?
Why not instead offer premium support/licensing options for GeForces in the datacenter?

Ugh. Stupid nvidia.
 
Topinio
Gerbil Jedi
Posts: 1522
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:28 am
Location: London

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Wed Jan 03, 2018 3:48 am

Duct Tape Dude wrote:
Why not instead offer premium support/licensing options for GeForces in the datacenter?

The Tesla driver is validated sufficiently to enable an offer of premium support, and this is baked into the TCO.

Or, another way to look at it is that the very existence of the Tesla range of boards at its higher price point is exactly how NVIDIA offers "premium support/licensing options for [its product] in the datacenter".

Use of GeForce products in the datacentre circumvents NVIDIA's market segmentation to reduce its margins and undercut its own profitability. Refusing to support this is about all it can do in response.

There's also only a low chance that NVIDIA doesn't know who has (or is considering/planning) thousands of its high-end GeForces in their datacentres, therefore this is also viewable as a possible shot across the bows or a PFO :wink:
Desktop: E3-1270 v5, X11SAT-F, 32GB, RX Vega 56, 250GB BX100, 2TB Ultrastar, Xonar DGX, XL2730Z + G2420HDB
HTPC: i5-2500K, DH67GD, 6GB, RX 580, 250GB 840 EVO :-? , 1.5TB Barracuda
Laptop: MacBook6,1
 
just brew it!
Gold subscriber
Administrator
Posts: 51651
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 10:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Wed Jan 03, 2018 4:20 am

Duct Tape Dude wrote:
This feels like first-amendment violations of a computer processor. There's no way this will be enforceable.

It's about as enforceable as any other arbitrary EULA limitation that isn't backed up with some form of DRM. IOW, yeah, not really. It'll scare some potential users off, while others will ignore the EULA restriction and use them anyway.

Duct Tape Dude wrote:
To skirt around this limitation, what's stopping someone from bootstrapping their existing code with a single call to git or some other blockchain tech?

Not even sure what you're suggesting here. I read the words, yet they seem to have no meaning.

Duct Tape Dude wrote:
Why not instead offer premium support/licensing options for GeForces in the datacenter?

As NovusBogus already pointed out, that's essentially what Quadro/Tesla are.

Duct Tape Dude wrote:
Ugh. Stupid nvidia.

From a business perspective it may actually be a pretty smart move.
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
Waco
Gold subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2496
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Los Alamos, NM

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Wed Jan 03, 2018 11:29 am

While I don't really like legal enforcement like this, it makes a lot of sense. It'll keep Geforce prices lower for gamers and force datacenter deployments to use the intended cards and software stack.

I have no doubts that Nvidia would go after a large customer circumventing the EULA with legal force.
Z170A Gaming Pro Carbon | 6700K @ 4.4 | 16 GB | GTX Titan Xm | Seasonic Gold 850 | XSPC RX360 | Heatkiller R3 | D5 + RP-452X2 | Cosmos II | Samsung 4K 40" | 2048 + 240 + LSI 9207-8i (128x8) SSDs
 
Welch
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Topic Author
Posts: 3579
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:03 pm

I'm not against them having some form of market segmentation, that is just business. I'm just against them being heavy handed with that segmentation so far as to threaten legal action.

Simply don't support GeForce cards in a data center environment (this would need a specific definition). JBI, you're dead on... Without DRM of some form then you are getting back into Microsoft's old licensing ways for CALS... An honor system. I can't even begin to tell you the number of accounts I took over where previous IT guys didn't give a damn about CAL licenses because the OS didn't enforce anything.

Of course this would probably be a waste of cash for Nvidia to try and bake a hardware form of DRM into their chips, not to mention R&D and staying on top of it.. possible issues it could create for a legitimate user base too. It's also not lost on me that a software solution would be just as pricey, be an on going effort and most likely be quickly circumvented by people who choose to use customer drivers or the like.

So yeah, I can see Nvidia being pissed that there is this market segmentation that they have little to no power over controlling. At the same time, is there a less forceful way for them to accomplish their goal that isn't an artificial steering of the market? It just seems shady to push an artificial "Fix" that only serves you the company and in turn screws over a large customer base where you could have came up with an actual solution.

I could be misreading this situation all together, I'm not 100% on the up-and-up for this particular GPU computing market stuff.
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943

1600x | Strix B350-F | CM 240 Lite | 16GB 3200 | MSI 7850 | 850 EVO | Corsair 400R | Seasonic X 850 | Corsair M95 / K90 | Sennheiser PC37x
 
bthylafh
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4096
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 11:55 pm
Location: Southwest Missouri, USA

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:12 pm

Duct Tape Dude wrote:
This feels like first-amendment violations of a computer processor.


:roll: :roll: :roll:
Hakkaa päälle!
i7-8700K|Asus Z-370 Pro|32GB DDR4|Asus Radeon RX-580|Samsung 960 EVO 1TB|1988 Model M||Logitech MX 518 & F310|Samsung C24FG70|Dell 2209WA|ATH-M50x
 
just brew it!
Gold subscriber
Administrator
Posts: 51651
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 10:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:11 pm

bthylafh wrote:
Duct Tape Dude wrote:
This feels like first-amendment violations of a computer processor.

:roll: :roll: :roll:

"Compute cycles just want to be free!"
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
bthylafh
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4096
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 11:55 pm
Location: Southwest Missouri, USA

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:49 pm

Hakkaa päälle!
i7-8700K|Asus Z-370 Pro|32GB DDR4|Asus Radeon RX-580|Samsung 960 EVO 1TB|1988 Model M||Logitech MX 518 & F310|Samsung C24FG70|Dell 2209WA|ATH-M50x
 
Krogoth
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Elder
Posts: 5475
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 3:20 pm
Location: somewhere on Core Prime
Contact:

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Wed Jan 03, 2018 9:58 pm

Nvidia never need to do this before because their previous customer-tier micro-architecture SKUs had general compete functions and performance gimped at the hardware level. They are easing this up with their customer-tier Volta SKUs in light of the crypto-currency craze. Notice how the EULA exempts crypto-currency mining? Not a coincidence.
Ivy Bridge i5-3570K@4.0Ghz, Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H, 2x4GiB of PC3-12800, Sapphire RX Vega 64, Corsair CX-600 and Fractal Refined R4 (W). Kentsfield Q6600@3Ghz, HD 4850 2x2GiB PC2-6400, Gigabyte EP45-DS4P, OCZ Modstream 700W, and PC-7B.
 
Kougar
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2253
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:12 am
Location: Texas

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Thu Jan 04, 2018 1:49 pm

I don't have a problem with NVIDIA wishing to enforce some measure of product segmentation. Processor and hard drive vendors already do it anyway.

Call me selfish, but as a consumer I'm for this simply because it helps protect me from price inflation, supply shortages, and whatever else massive companies might cause as a result from massive consumer graphics cards orders/deployments. Particularly if such deployments began making use of the consumer warranty process for their bulk orders.
 
Topinio
Gerbil Jedi
Posts: 1522
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:28 am
Location: London

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Thu Jan 04, 2018 1:54 pm

Kougar wrote:
Call me selfish, but as a consumer I'm for this simply because it helps protect me from price inflation, supply shortages, and whatever else massive companies might cause as a result from massive consumer graphics cards orders/deployments.

That's unsupported and contrary to evidence. The only thing that protects you from NVIDIA increasing prices on its consumer parts is competition from AMD, and that isn't happening as people are not buying AMD's products.

You might argue that a reason for that is people with data centres (in China) buying up AMD's consumer GPU products, ofc...
Desktop: E3-1270 v5, X11SAT-F, 32GB, RX Vega 56, 250GB BX100, 2TB Ultrastar, Xonar DGX, XL2730Z + G2420HDB
HTPC: i5-2500K, DH67GD, 6GB, RX 580, 250GB 840 EVO :-? , 1.5TB Barracuda
Laptop: MacBook6,1
 
Kougar
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2253
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:12 am
Location: Texas

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Thu Jan 04, 2018 2:34 pm

Topinio wrote:
That's unsupported and contrary to evidence. The only thing that protects you from NVIDIA increasing prices on its consumer parts is competition from AMD, and that isn't happening as people are not buying AMD's products.


It's simple supply and demand. The repeated drastic price inflation of the entire new (& secondary used) GPU markets caused from multiple, different cryptocurrency bubbles shows the potential still exists for there to be an effect on GPU markets.

Nvidia can price it's products at whatever it wants. But if for whatever reason NVIDIA did away with product segmentation and data centers and server farms began buying up consumer hardware instead of Tesla/Quadro parts then I could only imagine NVIDIA raising consumer prices as a result. So once again product segmentation provides some protection to consumers.
 
Duct Tape Dude
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 703
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 12:37 pm

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Thu Jan 04, 2018 4:06 pm

just brew it! wrote:
Duct Tape Dude wrote:
This feels like first-amendment violations of a computer processor. There's no way this will be enforceable.

It's about as enforceable as any other arbitrary EULA limitation that isn't backed up with some form of DRM. IOW, yeah, not really. It'll scare some potential users off, while others will ignore the EULA restriction and use them anyway.
Yeah, fair point. Maybe that's enough of a reason to do it.

just brew it! wrote:
Duct Tape Dude wrote:
To skirt around this limitation, what's stopping someone from bootstrapping their existing code with a single call to git or some other blockchain tech?

Not even sure what you're suggesting here. I read the words, yet they seem to have no meaning.
If nvidia allows blockchain processing, it seems easy to sneak in a use of a blockchain (like say, git or an iteration of any hashing algorithm) into any code and claim it's not against the EULA. It's trivial to play the "WELL TECKNIKULLY *pushes up glasses*" card.

just brew it! wrote:
Duct Tape Dude wrote:
Why not instead offer premium support/licensing options for GeForces in the datacenter?

As NovusBogus already pointed out, that's essentially what Quadro/Tesla are.
Duct Tape Dude wrote:
Ugh. Stupid nvidia.

From a business perspective it may actually be a pretty smart move.
Right, I get what Quadro/Tesla are for, and it'd make sense to just block GeForce altogether from the datacenter, or you know, refuse to support GeForce in compute applications altogether. Instead they want to block specific workloads on GeForce from the datacenter. It'd seem more apt if they just left out the blockchain part.

I'm quite happy to avoid fighting datacenters for my next GPU. This seems a silly way to do it.
 
chuckula
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Jedi
Posts: 1870
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: Probably where I don't belong.

Re: Nvidia forbids GeForce use in Data Centers...

Thu Jan 04, 2018 4:09 pm

This is a semi-related thread about the use of consumer GeForce cards in server cases. It looks like Nvidia is moving more strongly to prevent this from happening beyond the phyiscal setup of its consumer cards.
4770K @ 4.7 GHz; 32GB DDR3-2133; GTX-1080 sold and back to hipster IGP!; 512GB 840 Pro (2x); Fractal Define XL-R2; NZXT Kraken-X60
--Many thanks to the TR Forum for advice in getting it built.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests