Personal computing discussed

Moderators: morphine, SecretSquirrel

 
Welch
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Topic Author
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 7:20 pm

Interesting read.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevang ... tices/amp/

I personally wouldn't be surprised if this were the case. Nvidia has always had this sort of crap slinging type of mentality. I'll wait for more evidence and if it's serious enough we could see a suit with Intel and AMD against Nvidia for antitrust similar to Intel vs AMD had going before.

Waiting to see.
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943

1600x | Strix B350-F | CM 240 Lite | 16GB 3200 | MSI 7850 | 850 EVO | Corsair 400R | Seasonic X 850 | Corsair M95 / K90 | Sennheiser PC37x
 
Convert
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Posts: 3425
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 6:47 am

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 7:56 pm

I fail to understand the point of this program.

Does Nvidia really think they are saving someone from accidentally buying an AMD card by doing this? They think that someone out there beleives ROG always = Nvidia and so they just click buy on the first ROG card that shows up?

I don't know about anyone else, but I've never seen someone look for an Nvidia card by searching for the marketing slogan of an AIB.

In a roundabout way I would think it might be something a bit more than this. I wonder if they are hoping they can hijack all the well known marketing slogans. So if someone has a positive view of the ROG branding, Nvidia must be hoping that ROG becomes an Nvidia exclusive connection and a new branding is made up for AMD cards.

Seems odd though, because for the players that also make motherboards and other peripherals, I'd think they would keep their well known branding for their own stuff. Unless Nvidia grants the use of the branding for things that are not AMD, then I guess it's just a way to hijack the brand.
Tachyonic Karma: Future decisions traveling backwards in time to smite you now.
 
ludi
Lord High Gerbil
Posts: 8020
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 10:47 pm
Location: Sunny Colorado front range

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:19 pm

I'm so old, I not only remember when Google wasn't evil; I remember when Nvidia wasn't evil.
Abacus Model 2.5 | Quad-Row FX with 256 Cherry Red Slider Beads | Applewood Frame | Water Cooling by Brita Filtration
 
just brew it!
Gold subscriber
Administrator
Posts: 51531
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 10:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:21 pm

Convert wrote:
I fail to understand the point of this program.

Does Nvidia really think they are saving someone from accidentally buying an AMD card by doing this? They think that someone out there beleives ROG always = Nvidia and so they just click buy on the first ROG card that shows up?

From the article:
Forbes wrote:
For Nvidia partners, the program is set to deliver social media promotions, engineering and marketing support, and early access to new Nvidia GeForce technologies.

IOW most of the tangible benefits are for the board maker, not the customer. The spin about how it benefits the customer is just that -- spin.
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
synthtel2
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 772
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:30 am

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:43 pm

Go Kyle Bennett, asking the tough questions!

This is 100% in-character for the Nvidia I know, and I'm more surprised it took so long for something like this to wind up public.
 
derFunkenstein
Gold subscriber
Gerbil God
Posts: 24511
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 9:13 pm
Location: Comin' to you directly from the Mothership

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:52 pm

ludi wrote:
I'm so old, I not only remember when Google wasn't evil; I remember when Nvidia wasn't evil.

I remember those days where the upstart graphics company had its Riva 128 as the 2D card in lots of systems with one (or in some exotic cases, two) 3Dfx Voodoo 2 cards. Capital D in 3Dfx, baby.

But you know how it goes in these stories. You either die the hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain.
I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do.
 
JustAnEngineer
Gold subscriber
Gerbil God
Posts: 18217
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: The Heart of Dixie

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 9:38 pm

ludi wrote:
I'm so old, I not only remember when Google wasn't evil; I remember when Nvidia wasn't evil.
...and you walked there through the snow... uphill... both ways!
i7-8700K, H100i v2, RoG Strix Z370-G Gaming, 16 GiB, RX Vega64, Define Mini-C, SSR-850PX, C32HG70, RK-9000BR, MX518
 
bthylafh
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4084
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 11:55 pm
Location: Southwest Missouri, USA

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 9:58 pm

JustAnEngineer wrote:
ludi wrote:
I'm so old, I not only remember when Google wasn't evil; I remember when Nvidia wasn't evil.
...and you walked there through the snow... uphill... both ways!


Wearing a 50-pound rucksack and leaky old boots.
Hakkaa päälle!
i7-8700K|Asus Z-370 Pro|32GB DDR4|Asus Radeon RX-580|Samsung 960 EVO 1TB|1988 Model M||Logitech MX 518 & F310|Samsung C24FG70|Dell 2209WA|ATH-M50x
 
Krogoth
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Elder
Posts: 5452
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 3:20 pm
Location: somewhere on Core Prime
Contact:

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 10:15 pm

This is Nvidia's long-term bid in trying to keep gaming discrete cards relevant for the masses. iGPUs are beginning to eat away at "mid-range" discrete gaming market. It just a matter of time before discrete gaming cards become as niche as flightsticks, VR headsets, gaming steering wheels etc.
Ivy Bridge i5-3570K@4.0Ghz, Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H, 2x4GiB of PC3-12800, Sapphire RX Vega 64, Corsair CX-600 and Fractal Refined R4 (W). Kentsfield Q6600@3Ghz, HD 4850 2x2GiB PC2-6400, Gigabyte EP45-DS4P, OCZ Modstream 700W, and PC-7B.
 
jihadjoe
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 684
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:34 am

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 10:17 pm

synthtel2 wrote:
Go Kyle Bennett, asking the tough questions!

This is 100% in-character for the Nvidia I know, and I'm more surprised it took so long for something like this to wind up public.

Funny because Kyle has been vilified several times in the past by the AMD subreddit for being biased toward Nvidia. There is no way to please the people in there.
Last edited by jihadjoe on Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
DragonDaddyBear
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 759
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:01 am

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 10:18 pm

Convert wrote:
I fail to understand the point of this program.

This would cause people to associate gaming with the green team, meaning the only growing PC segment, gaming, would highly favor them because consumers would choose green over red.
 
NovusBogus
Silver subscriber
Graphmaster Gerbil
Posts: 1288
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 12:37 am

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:10 pm

This just sounds like an authorized distributor/reseller network to me, honestly. Heck, not even that strict since those typically do come with exclusivity clauses and geographical restrictions. So general bitching is fine--NV probably deserves it, arrogant as they are--but good luck trying to build any kind of legal argument against something that everyone and their doggie has been doing since the dawn of time.
 
ludi
Lord High Gerbil
Posts: 8020
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 10:47 pm
Location: Sunny Colorado front range

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:25 pm

bthylafh wrote:
Wearing a 50-pound rucksack and leaky old boots.

You had a rucksack for your CRT? What privilege.
Abacus Model 2.5 | Quad-Row FX with 256 Cherry Red Slider Beads | Applewood Frame | Water Cooling by Brita Filtration
 
Ryu Connor
Gold subscriber
Global Moderator
Posts: 4320
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Marietta, GA
Contact:

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:41 pm

I'm perplexed by all the talk of anti-competitive behavior.

They don't have significant market power or government backing.

Image

I wouldn't expect any regulatory bodies to get involved in this.

AMD fished this to Kyle to create a tempest in a teapot. Looks like he took the bait.
All of my written content here on TR does not represent or reflect the views of my employer or any reasonable human being. All content and actions are my own.
 
Welch
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Topic Author
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:47 pm

Ryu Connor wrote:
I'm perplexed by all the talk of anti-competitive behavior.

They don't have significant market power or government backing.

Image

I wouldn't expect any regulatory bodies to get involved in this.

AMD fished this to Kyle to create a tempest in a teapot. Looks like he took the bait.


The "claim" is that AMD didn't lead them in that direction, but I guess we will see in time. At this point it is all hearsay from Kyle and the Forbes article author. I'm curious to see where if anywhere it leads.
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943

1600x | Strix B350-F | CM 240 Lite | 16GB 3200 | MSI 7850 | 850 EVO | Corsair 400R | Seasonic X 850 | Corsair M95 / K90 | Sennheiser PC37x
 
Ryu Connor
Gold subscriber
Global Moderator
Posts: 4320
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Marietta, GA
Contact:

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:53 pm

Welch wrote:
The "claim" is that AMD didn't lead them in that direction, but I guess we will see in time. At this point it is all hearsay from Kyle and the Forbes article author. I'm curious to see where if anywhere it leads.


This is how opposition research works in politics too.

A political entity with deep pockets does the leg work and finds a skeleton(s) that will create perceptual and/or real issues for a public figure.

Then they drop some clues/hints to the press and step away, cleanly removing the discussions of bias or other tangential concerns from the story. The political entity merely becomes yet another "anonymous source" that helped make the story possible.

This really deserves one of those GIFs of people clapping and someone saying, "Well played, AMD. Well played."
All of my written content here on TR does not represent or reflect the views of my employer or any reasonable human being. All content and actions are my own.
 
Welch
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Topic Author
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:58 pm

Ryu Connor wrote:
Welch wrote:
The "claim" is that AMD didn't lead them in that direction, but I guess we will see in time. At this point it is all hearsay from Kyle and the Forbes article author. I'm curious to see where if anywhere it leads.


This is how opposition research works in politics too.

A political entity with deep pockets does the leg work and finds a skeleton(s) that will create perceptual and/or real issues for a public figure.

Then they drop some clues/hints to the press and step away, cleanly removing the discussions of bias or other tangential concerns from the story. The political entity merely becomes yet another "anonymous source" that helped make the story possible.

This really deserves one of those GIFs of people clapping and someone saying, "Well played, AMD. Well played."


Very true, it probably should have been kept under wraps until something could be shown in hard evidence that Nvidia was in fact doing what was alleged. It's like the current political claims about certain politicians (like you said). A lot of those claims are either wildly exaggerated or never happened, yet it boarders on the possible enough that people can imagine it is real. Just from comments on here, most of us wouldn't be surprised if Nvidia was in fact trying to rig this in this manner.

As far as Intel having the lion's share, we all know that is just general GPU, not discrete. Since Intel doesn't have a discrete option, I wonder if you could show those markets as their own segment and then a regulatory body would care to take action? Again, if any of this materializes.
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943

1600x | Strix B350-F | CM 240 Lite | 16GB 3200 | MSI 7850 | 850 EVO | Corsair 400R | Seasonic X 850 | Corsair M95 / K90 | Sennheiser PC37x
 
Ryu Connor
Gold subscriber
Global Moderator
Posts: 4320
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Marietta, GA
Contact:

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:09 am

Welch wrote:
As far as Intel having the lion's share, we all know that is just general GPU, not discrete. Since Intel doesn't have a discrete option, I wonder if you could show those markets as their own segment and then a regulatory body would care to take action? Again, if any of this materializes.


If Kyle was as good a journalist as he claimed, we would already have some answers for that. He could have paid a business lawyer for their time to dig up some relevant statutes and precedent that would have provided some clarity.

Of course if he did that and found out that there isn't an issue... well then. This wouldn't be a giant clickbait traffic driver for his site would it?

Who needs facts when you can just put geeks into moral outrage. We love moral outrage.

AMD filed suit against Intel the last time they felt they were getting screwed. This time they just shop it to the press? Perhaps our answer is made clear by their actions.
All of my written content here on TR does not represent or reflect the views of my employer or any reasonable human being. All content and actions are my own.
 
anotherengineer
Gerbil Jedi
Posts: 1549
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:53 pm
Location: Northern, ON Canada, Yes I know, Up in the sticks

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:38 am

Ryu Connor wrote:
I'm perplexed by all the talk of anti-competitive behavior.

They don't have significant market power or government backing.

Image

I wouldn't expect any regulatory bodies to get involved in this.

AMD fished this to Kyle to create a tempest in a teapot. Looks like he took the bait.


doh conflicting charts ;)
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/
Life doesn't change after marriage, it changes after children!
 
CScottG
Graphmaster Gerbil
Posts: 1124
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 1:15 am

It's not a legitimate article - its a gossip-piece. (..not a single point of concern mentioned is substantiated.)

A. going after specific product branding doesn't achieve the sort of market penetration that would result in something anti-competetive (at least when comparing it to the Intel suit); B. it effects specfic branding of customer's choices - that doesn't mean that it actually will effect the underlying product choices; C. Disruption is only with respect to specific product branding, not doing business with AMD or Intel.


What it does do is "hit" an OEM's capability to "up-sell" cards/systems from AMD & Intel (through specific branding) - it "eats" into their profit margin.

I'm pretty sure that Nvidia has looked at current law to make sure it's legal (..it's not like they don't have the resources). ..of course any given jurisdiction could enact law to change that (..most notably the EU), though the "program" might be limited to certain markets (jurisdictions) to "side-step" this potential problem.



-now the "non-compliance" (not getting with the "program") condition of limiting Nvidia GPU's to OEM's would almost certainly run "foul" of anti-competitive laws - BUT that's only if it can be proven AND if supply wasn't something that couldn't be explained in *OTHER circumstances.

*crappy as it may be - but for once we have such a condition.
 
Glorious
Gold subscriber
Gerbilus Supremus
Posts: 11085
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 6:35 pm

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 8:58 am

Ryu Connor wrote:
If Kyle was as good a journalist as he claimed, we would already have some answers for that.


You know, this is what annoyed me the most: that article was terribly written. I mean, the Forbes article was even worse, because after reading it I was entirely unclear on what exactly was even being alleged (I repeat, it was awful), but Kyle's wasn't all that much better.

There seem to be two charges buried in endless blather of vague characterization and sensationalism.

1) Nvidia has a brand development co-marketing agreement for which it provides all or most of the funding in which the language involved suggests that dual-branding might be disallowed.

Of course, a) Kyle only quotes a context-less single sentence to substantiate this b) He provides only one example where this might even be a problem, ASUS's ROG, but he has no idea if it actually is or if ASUS is even a partner in this scheme c) he states his own non-tentative conclusion based upon his reading and his understanding of this sentence without referencing any source for it whatsoever.

The problem here is that, on the face of it, this is not anti-competitive. If I am co-marketing with you, I'm fully allowed to make restrictions on how you conduct that marketing. I am paying money to promote your X brand, of course I can insist that you don't also use X brand to market my competitor's products. If you don't like that, you just say no. This is common sense: If I make a new "Gusto"TM motor and pay for an ad campaign to say it is in Packard Vehicles's new "GoFAST"TM car, if it turns out that they are also selling "GoFAST"TM cars with another motor altogether and the ads just say "BUY THE NEW AWESOME GoFAST car!!!! *even better with Gusto motors which they may or may not have depending on dealership", yeah, that's wrong.

That's fundamentally different than the AMD/Intel/Dell/FTC brouhaha: Intel was giving Dell discounts for product purchases for not selling AMD altogether. Yes, duh, that's anti-competitive.

2) There is wink/nod that Nvidia might hold back shipments or volume or whatever if you don't play nice.

That's a huge deal if true, but it's also just a single statement in Kyle's article with literally nothing to substantiate it. He states that companies "feel that way", but he explicitly says it isn't contractual and he doesn't mention which or how many.

So... maybe just don't publish this claim then?
 
Captain Ned
Gold subscriber
Global Moderator
Posts: 27266
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:12 am

Glorious wrote:
So... maybe just don't publish this claim then?

Where are the click-through rates on that?
Humans sleep soundly in their beds because rough cats stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.
 
just brew it!
Gold subscriber
Administrator
Posts: 51531
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 10:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:16 am

Kyle? Jump to conclusions? Say it isn't so!

/s
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
Bauxite
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 763
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: electrolytic redox smelting plant

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:51 am

Ryu Connor wrote:
I'm perplexed by all the talk of anti-competitive behavior.

They don't have significant market power or government backing.

[terrible graph of a tree in a forest]

I wouldn't expect any regulatory bodies to get involved in this.

AMD fished this to Kyle to create a tempest in a teapot. Looks like he took the bait.


That graph is about as relevant to reality as posting the brand of capacitors on motherboards. You also don't have to be a monopoly to put illegal terms in business contracts.
I'm going to dig deep in my nerd bucket here and call your post deliberately obtuse.

Pretty funny that you float amd as the source for kyle too.
2018: at 120 Zen cores and counting, so pretty much done with intel on the desktop.
E5 2696v4 22c44t 2.2~3.7Ghz - The last great gleam of the pre-nerf HEDT era.
E5 1680v2 8c16t 4.5Ghz - "Yes Virginia, there were unlocked xeons" /weep for them.
 
Glorious
Gold subscriber
Gerbilus Supremus
Posts: 11085
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 6:35 pm

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:17 am

Bauxite wrote:
That graph is about as relevant to reality as posting the brand of capacitors on motherboards. You also don't have to be a monopoly to put illegal terms in business contracts.


Oh man.

Ok. Deep breath.

YOUR statement is about as relevant to reality as $RANDOM_NERD_EXAMPLE.

Why?

Because what are the illegal terms? To the first claim: Co-marketing like this isn't illegal to my knowledge (though yes, I am not a lawyer, do not even look like a lawyer, etc..., and so I absolutely welcome a well-cited reprimand, particularly if from an actual lawyer or person in a lawish profession).

to the second claim: Kyle explicitly states that contract does not contain any such threats, just that "people" "feel" it is "wink/nod" like that. :roll:

Bauxite wrote:
I'm going to dig deep in my nerd bucket here and call your post deliberately obtuse.


It isn't though.

I mean, do you read these forums? There is a recent thread literally entitled "Who's down with the IGP"

Saying that ACME dominates the add-in motor when 1) the vast majority of vehicles come with original motors now 2) the vast majority of customers do not purchase replacement motors, whether at the dealership or aftermarket 3) and the original motors are becoming more and more suitable for most purposes (which is why #2 is happening so much now) is what is mostly obtuse.

I mean, there's a point to be made about the add-in motor market, sure, but you criticism is AT LEAST as much of an overstatement as what you are criticizing on that basis.

Bauxite wrote:
Pretty funny that you float amd as the source for kyle too.


PLEASE DON'T SPREAD RIDICULOUS NONSENSE:

Forbes Article wrote:
This is not a story Bennett just stumbled onto. Several weeks ago AMD approached Bennett (and other undisclosed journalists) about a new Nvidia program launching called the GeForce Partner Program


Kyle HIMSELF wrote:
Before we go any further, in the effort to be as transparent as possible, we need to let you know that AMD came to us and presented us with "this story." AMD shopped this story with other websites as well.


I MEAN, COME ON. DID YOU READ THESE?
 
RAGEPRO
Gerbil
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 9:50 am
Location: Golden Triangle, Texas
Contact:

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:52 am

Ryu Connor wrote:
They don't have significant market power or government backing.
(chart redacted for space)
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I thought it topical to stop in and remark that this chart isn't particularly relevant to the conversation of AMD vs. Nvidia in the discrete graphics space. If you look at the discrete graphics card sales Nvidia does indeed dwarf AMD by a factor of 5:1 or more. Customers primarily using integrated graphics don't have a lot to do with the competition between AMD and Nvidia.
 
Glorious
Gold subscriber
Gerbilus Supremus
Posts: 11085
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 6:35 pm

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:14 am

RAGEPRO wrote:
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I thought it topical to stop in and remark that this chart isn't particularly relevant to the conversation of AMD vs. Nvidia in the discrete graphics space. If you look at the discrete graphics card sales Nvidia does indeed dwarf AMD by a factor of 5:1 or more.


And if you look at integrated graphics they're not dominant by the same amount or more.

Everything else remaining the same, why should one favor the discrete graphics market over the integrated one?

Especially since in the vast majority of cases people buying a discrete Nvidia GPU already bought a integrated one, and in *ALL* cases they bought a CPU from the other companies?

EDIT: Even more importantly, in US regulatory law, "Monopoly Power" isn't simply a matter of a market dominance in a particular market, forget a submarket, in the first place. If that dominance is reversed in a super-set of that market, this just gets silly: "ETSY HAS MARKET DOMINANCE IN HANDICRAFTS, SO STOP WITH FUD LIKE GRAPHS ABOUT AMAZON ONLINE SALES MARKET SHARE and who cares if Amazon is shopping this evil Etsy story around!"

*yes, yes, AMD is vastly smaller than Nvidia(despite their revenues being very comparable), but AMD is now doing deals with Intel for on-package GPUs, right?

RAGEPRO wrote:
Customers primarily using integrated graphics don't have a lot to do with the competition between AMD and Nvidia


Because there literally isn't any?
 
cegras
Gerbil First Class
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 3:12 pm

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:35 am

By your logic, there is no such thing as a monopoly since the TAM for any company is a subset of the entire global market. Intel doesn't have a monopoly on server chips because its server chip shipments are only a small fraction of total chips of any kind shipped.

There's also a question of whether this practice is questionable or not, and a business lawyer should weigh in: are companies allowed to pay middle-men not to sell competitor's products? Naively, it would seem that ultimately customers should be the sole deciders of purchasing decisions, with advertising falling into a grey area.
Last edited by cegras on Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
Ryu Connor
Gold subscriber
Global Moderator
Posts: 4320
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Marietta, GA
Contact:

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:38 am

cegras wrote:
By your logic, there is no such thing as a monopoly since the TAM for any company is a subset of the entire global market. Intel doesn't have a monopoly on server chips because its server chip shipments are only a small fraction of total chips of any kind shipped.


You've gotten monopoly and monopsony confused.
All of my written content here on TR does not represent or reflect the views of my employer or any reasonable human being. All content and actions are my own.
 
cegras
Gerbil First Class
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 3:12 pm

Re: Nvidia Partner Program - Illegal?

Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:45 am

I don't think so? Any chip maker sells chips to a wider and wider network of buyers through various middle men layers. At no point is there a sole buyer that is abusing its purchasing power to influence the market. If HP was the only server maker that would be what you describe.

Nvidia does not compete much, if at all, in the integrated GPU business. If it becomes the sole supplier of products in its market segment by pushing AMD out, it would by definition be a monopoly.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest