Personal computing discussed

Moderators: morphine, SecretSquirrel

 
Waco
Gold subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2663
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Los Alamos, NM

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Wed Nov 28, 2018 9:24 pm

I find that a rock-solid 50+ FPS is fine. I don't game competitively and I usually game with an adult beverage or a few. :)
Desktop: Z170A Gaming Pro Carbon | 6700K @ 4.4 | 16 GB | Radeon VII | XSPC RX360 | Heatkiller R3 | Samsung 4K 40" | 2048 + 240 + LSI 9207-8i (128x8) SSD
NAS: 1950X | Designare EX | 32 GB ECC | 7x8 TB RAIDZ2 | 8x2 TB RAID10 | FreeNAS | ZFS | LSI SAS
 
jihadjoe
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 743
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:34 am

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Wed Nov 28, 2018 9:54 pm

Curious if it's an A or a non-A chip like how the 2070 is apparently being segmented.
 
Jigar
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4917
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 12:17 am

techguy wrote:
Jigar wrote:
Memory cooling seems to be issue with Turing cards, i would suggest you install extra fan to cool this card.


No, it doesn't.

https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/3394 ... ck-screens


Never ever conclude just by reading one review site analysis.

Here read the following site that hasn't signed the NDA (5 year contract) with Nvidia.

https://www.hardocp.com/article/2018/11 ... r_8_hours/

Below you will find user's also providing their input.

https://hardforum.com/threads/rtx-2080- ... h.1972149/

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comment ... _dying_in/
Image
 
drfish
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Elder
Topic Author
Posts: 5284
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: Zeeland, MI

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 6:23 am

jihadjoe wrote:
Curious if it's an A or a non-A chip like how the 2070 is apparently being segmented.


Likewise, but I won't be taking it apart unless I decide to put a water cooler on it down the road a bit. I'm also curious to know what the actual boost clock it settles on in-game is and I'm curious how much higher using Scanner to OC it will take it (and, later on, how the water cooler changes things). So far, I haven't seen a thread anywhere else about the 11G-P4-2281-KR from someone who ordered it with fast shipping. This may be the place to read about how the first "cheap" 2080 Ti stacks up.
TR BBQ XV is over.
 
End User
Gold subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2968
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 6:47 pm
Location: Upper Canada

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 7:14 am

I recently received a package direct from EVGA:

Image


It's going into a new build this weekend. Yeehaw! :D
 
drfish
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Elder
Topic Author
Posts: 5284
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: Zeeland, MI

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 7:20 am

Nice! Of course, those were back in stock on Tuesday afternoon and I felt a tinge of regret for not waiting but, come on, I'm going to play at 2560x1080, a couple hundred MHz isn't going to wreck my experience.
TR BBQ XV is over.
 
DragonDaddyBear
Silver subscriber
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 840
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:01 am

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 8:04 am

drfish wrote:
Nice! Of course, those were back in stock on Tuesday afternoon and I felt a tinge of regret for not waiting but, come on, I'm going to play at 2560x1080, a couple hundred MHz isn't going to wreck my experience.


As someone once said, "Fish, you idiot, you should have waited!" :lol:
 
drfish
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Elder
Topic Author
Posts: 5284
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: Zeeland, MI

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 8:31 am

Creating/being the being the butt of that niche-meme will always make whatever poor timing I have worth it.
TR BBQ XV is over.
 
techguy
Gerbil XP
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:12 am

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 10:20 am

Jigar wrote:
techguy wrote:
Jigar wrote:
Memory cooling seems to be issue with Turing cards, i would suggest you install extra fan to cool this card.


No, it doesn't.

https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/3394 ... ck-screens


Never ever conclude just by reading one review site analysis.

Here read the following site that hasn't signed the NDA (5 year contract) with Nvidia.

https://www.hardocp.com/article/2018/11 ... r_8_hours/

Below you will find user's also providing their input.

https://hardforum.com/threads/rtx-2080- ... h.1972149/

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comment ... _dying_in/


So you take issue with my citation of a single "professional" source by doing the same? One that has clear biases, at that. Kyle Bennett is on Nvidia's blacklist because he's a drama queen. The NDA nonsense is just his latest mountain out of a molehill.

That's not a rebuttal either. Show me TardOCP's (or anyone else's) extensive, conclusive, unbiased investigation of the matter. The fact is, no one else in the tech journalism industry has done what Steve from Gamer's Nexus has done to investigate this issue. He called for users to send him dead cards and they responded in droves. The sample size he's working with is much larger than TardOCP's 3.

So you want to take Kyle "drama queen" Bennett's opinion over cold, hard facts. Be my guest. I won't waste time trying to convince you otherwise.
 
End User
Gold subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2968
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 6:47 pm
Location: Upper Canada

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 1:03 pm

The "limited test escapes" issue appears to be isolated to FE cards from Nvidia.
 
End User
Gold subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2968
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 6:47 pm
Location: Upper Canada

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 1:05 pm

I follow @EVGA_JacobF on Twitter so I got a heads up on upcoming availability prior to being auto notified. I was ready to pounce when the buy button appeared.

https://twitter.com/EVGA_JacobF
 
drfish
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Elder
Topic Author
Posts: 5284
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: Zeeland, MI

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 1:19 pm

Yeah, he posted about the FTW3 being back in stock on Tuesday a couple hours after I ordered the Black on Monday. :roll:

I'm looking forward to seeing how the boost clocks and temps on our cards compare. Jeff let me know this about the FE card he has (in Unigine Heaven):

with power and thermal limits maxed and fans at 100% the FE seems to want to hang out around 1965-1980 MHz


We'll see...
TR BBQ XV is over.
 
Kretschmer
Silver subscriber
Gerbil XP
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 10:36 am

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 3:37 pm

drfish wrote:
Creating/being the being the butt of that niche-meme will always make whatever poor timing I have worth it.

Hey, I bought a 7700K like four months before Coffee Lake launched.
And then a 7700HQ laptop like a month before mobile Coffee Lake launched.

Zero regrets (except design flaws with said laptop - damn you, Lenovo!).
 
techguy
Gerbil XP
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:12 am

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Thu Nov 29, 2018 4:22 pm

Kretschmer wrote:
drfish wrote:
Creating/being the being the butt of that niche-meme will always make whatever poor timing I have worth it.

Hey, I bought a 7700K like four months before Coffee Lake launched.
And then a 7700HQ laptop like a month before mobile Coffee Lake launched.

Zero regrets (except design flaws with said laptop - damn you, Lenovo!).


I bought a 7700k in January 2017, still a few months before Coffee Lake but in the grand scheme of things, not too far apart. I was somewhat kicking myself after Coffee Lake launch but my 7700k is a golden sample - 5.2GHz at 1.39V 24x7 AVX stable no less. Absolute beauty of a chip, probably my best result in the "silicon lottery" over the past couple decades. I'm going to hold out until Comet Lake or whatever Intel puts out next. Maybe Ryzen 3000 if they can close the gap in IPC + clocks.
 
Jigar
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4917
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 1:28 am

techguy wrote:
Jigar wrote:
techguy wrote:


Never ever conclude just by reading one review site analysis.

Here read the following site that hasn't signed the NDA (5 year contract) with Nvidia.

https://www.hardocp.com/article/2018/11 ... r_8_hours/

Below you will find user's also providing their input.

https://hardforum.com/threads/rtx-2080- ... h.1972149/

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comment ... _dying_in/


So you take issue with my citation of a single "professional" source by doing the same? One that has clear biases, at that. Kyle Bennett is on Nvidia's blacklist because he's a drama queen. The NDA nonsense is just his latest mountain out of a molehill.

That's not a rebuttal either. Show me TardOCP's (or anyone else's) extensive, conclusive, unbiased investigation of the matter. The fact is, no one else in the tech journalism industry has done what Steve from Gamer's Nexus has done to investigate this issue. He called for users to send him dead cards and they responded in droves. The sample size he's working with is much larger than TardOCP's 3.

So you want to take Kyle "drama queen" Bennett's opinion over cold, hard facts. Be my guest. I won't waste time trying to convince you otherwise.


I told you before, i am telling you again. Never ever take one source as end of story. I presented to you with user views as well but you conveniently ignored it.

Anyway below are the links that might help.

News - https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing ... rds-dying/

More users RTX card dead https://forums.geforce.com/default/topi ... vely-die-/


Reviewer's card dead (Ignoring HardOCP 3 dead cards since you don't trust it)

Joker production - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewiFtgfK0KY


UFD Tech - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P18d6uLZ4qk

Hardware Unboxed - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z75wDmwfIJY
Image
 
End User
Gold subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2968
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 6:47 pm
Location: Upper Canada

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 5:28 am

Jigar wrote:
I told you before, i am telling you again. Never ever take one source as end of story. I presented to you with user views as well but you conveniently ignored it.

Thanks for caring so damn much.

When my RTX card dies you will be the first to know.
 
Kretschmer
Silver subscriber
Gerbil XP
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 10:36 am

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 12:06 pm

techguy wrote:
Kretschmer wrote:
drfish wrote:
Creating/being the being the butt of that niche-meme will always make whatever poor timing I have worth it.

Hey, I bought a 7700K like four months before Coffee Lake launched.
And then a 7700HQ laptop like a month before mobile Coffee Lake launched.

Zero regrets (except design flaws with said laptop - damn you, Lenovo!).


I bought a 7700k in January 2017, still a few months before Coffee Lake but in the grand scheme of things, not too far apart. I was somewhat kicking myself after Coffee Lake launch but my 7700k is a golden sample - 5.2GHz at 1.39V 24x7 AVX stable no less. Absolute beauty of a chip, probably my best result in the "silicon lottery" over the past couple decades. I'm going to hold out until Comet Lake or whatever Intel puts out next. Maybe Ryzen 3000 if they can close the gap in IPC + clocks.

I was really kicking myself until I saw how close a 7700K and 8700K perform when both use fast RAM. I don't really feel constrained by my 7700K for games. It'd be nice to have a few extra cores for photo processing, but overnight import and processing jobs would make the return-on-upgrade pretty niche.

What kind of cooling and/or chip modifications did you throw at that 7700K? And does it still switch to lower power states? A 15% boost is nothing to sneeze at but isn't enough to justify replacing my existing 140mm radiator.
 
techguy
Gerbil XP
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:12 am

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 12:54 pm

Kretschmer wrote:
techguy wrote:
Kretschmer wrote:
Hey, I bought a 7700K like four months before Coffee Lake launched.
And then a 7700HQ laptop like a month before mobile Coffee Lake launched.

Zero regrets (except design flaws with said laptop - damn you, Lenovo!).


I bought a 7700k in January 2017, still a few months before Coffee Lake but in the grand scheme of things, not too far apart. I was somewhat kicking myself after Coffee Lake launch but my 7700k is a golden sample - 5.2GHz at 1.39V 24x7 AVX stable no less. Absolute beauty of a chip, probably my best result in the "silicon lottery" over the past couple decades. I'm going to hold out until Comet Lake or whatever Intel puts out next. Maybe Ryzen 3000 if they can close the gap in IPC + clocks.

I was really kicking myself until I saw how close a 7700K and 8700K perform when both use fast RAM. I don't really feel constrained by my 7700K for games. It'd be nice to have a few extra cores for photo processing, but overnight import and processing jobs would make the return-on-upgrade pretty niche.

What kind of cooling and/or chip modifications did you throw at that 7700K? And does it still switch to lower power states? A 15% boost is nothing to sneeze at but isn't enough to justify replacing my existing 140mm radiator.


I de-lidded it and applied liquid metal, run a custom water loop with 2 radiators (a 360 and a 140). Running the RAM at 3600MHZ C16 (just XMP). It was a nice bump over the 4790k @ 5GHz it replaced (also de-lidded and on the same custom loop). I don't bother with offset voltage and also disable low power modes so the chip is running full-out all the time. The system is only on for a few hours at a time, and only maybe once or twice a week so its effective lifespan should still be quite long.

I started de-lidding when Ivy Bridge was released and am still doing it today. Since Intel seems to have forgotten how to solder, I would likely still do so with any future soldered chip I purchase (except AMD). For me, it's worth the effort since I do flight sim which is primarily bound by single thread performance. An extra couple hundred MHz can be just enough to smooth out performance in the worst case scenarios. Probably not worth it to most people though.
 
Krogoth
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Elder
Posts: 5605
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 3:20 pm
Location: somewhere on Core Prime
Contact:

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 1:01 pm

techguy wrote:
Kretschmer wrote:
techguy wrote:

I bought a 7700k in January 2017, still a few months before Coffee Lake but in the grand scheme of things, not too far apart. I was somewhat kicking myself after Coffee Lake launch but my 7700k is a golden sample - 5.2GHz at 1.39V 24x7 AVX stable no less. Absolute beauty of a chip, probably my best result in the "silicon lottery" over the past couple decades. I'm going to hold out until Comet Lake or whatever Intel puts out next. Maybe Ryzen 3000 if they can close the gap in IPC + clocks.

I was really kicking myself until I saw how close a 7700K and 8700K perform when both use fast RAM. I don't really feel constrained by my 7700K for games. It'd be nice to have a few extra cores for photo processing, but overnight import and processing jobs would make the return-on-upgrade pretty niche.

What kind of cooling and/or chip modifications did you throw at that 7700K? And does it still switch to lower power states? A 15% boost is nothing to sneeze at but isn't enough to justify replacing my existing 140mm radiator.


I de-lidded it and applied liquid metal, run a custom water loop with 2 radiators (a 360 and a 140). Running the RAM at 3600MHZ C16 (just XMP). It was a nice bump over the 4790k @ 5GHz it replaced (also de-lidded and on the same custom loop). I don't bother with offset voltage and also disable low power modes so the chip is running full-out all the time. The system is only on for a few hours at a time, and only maybe once or twice a week so its effective lifespan should still be quite long.

I started de-lidding when Ivy Bridge was released and am still doing it today. Since Intel seems to have forgotten how to solder, I would likely still do so with any future soldered chip I purchase (except AMD). For me, it's worth the effort since I do flight sim which is primarily bound by single thread performance. An extra couple hundred MHz can be just enough to smooth out performance in the worst case scenarios. Probably not worth it to most people though.


Intel didn't forget how to solder IHS though. The thermal issues with Ivy Bridge/first batch Haswell chips have never been from TIM. They were from QC issues with IHS mounting at the fab. Soldering just made IHS fitting/mounting more consistent at the fab.
Last edited by Krogoth on Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gigabyte Z390 AORUS-PRO Coffee Lake R 9700K, 2x8GiB of G.Skill DDR4-3600, Sapphire RX Vega 64, Corsair CX-750M V2 and Fractal Define R4 (W)
Ivy Bridge 3570K, 2x4GiB of G.Skill RIPSAW DDR3-1600, Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H, Corsair CX-750M V2, and PC-7B
 
End User
Gold subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2968
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 6:47 pm
Location: Upper Canada

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 3:03 pm

For me:

Just Cause 4
Battlefield V
Far Cry 5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
Star Wars Battlefront II
Doom
 
techguy
Gerbil XP
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:12 am

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 3:56 pm

Krogoth wrote:
techguy wrote:
Kretschmer wrote:
I was really kicking myself until I saw how close a 7700K and 8700K perform when both use fast RAM. I don't really feel constrained by my 7700K for games. It'd be nice to have a few extra cores for photo processing, but overnight import and processing jobs would make the return-on-upgrade pretty niche.

What kind of cooling and/or chip modifications did you throw at that 7700K? And does it still switch to lower power states? A 15% boost is nothing to sneeze at but isn't enough to justify replacing my existing 140mm radiator.


I de-lidded it and applied liquid metal, run a custom water loop with 2 radiators (a 360 and a 140). Running the RAM at 3600MHZ C16 (just XMP). It was a nice bump over the 4790k @ 5GHz it replaced (also de-lidded and on the same custom loop). I don't bother with offset voltage and also disable low power modes so the chip is running full-out all the time. The system is only on for a few hours at a time, and only maybe once or twice a week so its effective lifespan should still be quite long.

I started de-lidding when Ivy Bridge was released and am still doing it today. Since Intel seems to have forgotten how to solder, I would likely still do so with any future soldered chip I purchase (except AMD). For me, it's worth the effort since I do flight sim which is primarily bound by single thread performance. An extra couple hundred MHz can be just enough to smooth out performance in the worst case scenarios. Probably not worth it to most people though.


Intel didn't forget to solder though. The thermal issues with Ivy Bridge/first batch Haswell chips have never been from TIM. They were from QC issues with IHS mounting at the fab. Soldering just made IHS fitting/mounting more consistent at the fab.


I've seen you make comments along these lines several times in the news post comments, and have attempted to correct you on your misconceptions about the cause of poor thermal conductivity for Intel desktop microprocessors post-Sandy Bridge. I've personally de-lidded somewhere in the range of 10 CPUs now for myself and several friends/clients since Ivy Bridge. The cause is not singular. The manufacturing process post-Sandy Bridge, having omitted solder TIM, necessitated the use of an adhesive to affix the IHS to the PCB. This introduced a measurable gap which needed to be filled. Since paste TIM has quite poor thermal conductivity (relative to solder TIM or liquid metal), the copious amounts required to thermally connect the underside of the IHS with the CPU die acted to insulate heat. The problem, therefore, is two-fold.

The solution is to use a vastly superior TIM (liquid metal) AND reduce the IHS gap by eliminating the adhesive (epoxy). Case-in-point: Intel themselves *claimed* to have corrected this problem with the Devil's Canyon generation of desktop processors through the use of higher quality paste TIM AND a reduction in IHS z-height. I actually went out and bought a 4790k to upgrade from a de-lidded 4770k, and to test out Intel's claims. Guess what: there was still a gap, and stock performance was only marginally improved over Haswell. De-lid to the rescue!

I've also de-lidded Skylake and Kaby Lake generation CPUs which, admittedly, have lower IHS z-height values than pre-Devil's Canyon chips but once again, still suffer from poor stock thermal conductivity.

So here's the thing about de-lidding. There's not much point to it if you:
1) don't overclock (or OC very little)
2) are still thermally-constrained by inadequate cooling (like air or AIO water)
So there are lots and lots of results out there where people show thermal improvement of only 5-10C under these conditions. These results are not relevant. Just like testing "CPU performance" in games with ultra settings at 4k resolution, the test conditions do not expose the full potential, so it is wrong to draw conclusions from this data.
 
Krogoth
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Elder
Posts: 5605
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 3:20 pm
Location: somewhere on Core Prime
Contact:

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:10 pm

It always has been an IHS fitting problem. People who had simply de-lid and reseated the IHS on Ivy Bridge/first batch Haswell chips got massive returns. Changing TIM yield far smaller returns. The problem was never the TIM. The packing tools and equipment were tuned to soldered chips. Intel mostly fixed it with Devil Canyon and newer silicon. You can still returns on newer chips but you'll get far more by replacing the stock TIM. The only reason to de-lid is if you want to run the chips naked or use a better TIM/liquid metal then the stock stuff.
Last edited by Krogoth on Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gigabyte Z390 AORUS-PRO Coffee Lake R 9700K, 2x8GiB of G.Skill DDR4-3600, Sapphire RX Vega 64, Corsair CX-750M V2 and Fractal Define R4 (W)
Ivy Bridge 3570K, 2x4GiB of G.Skill RIPSAW DDR3-1600, Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H, Corsair CX-750M V2, and PC-7B
 
techguy
Gerbil XP
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:12 am

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:26 pm

Krogoth wrote:
It always has been an IHS fitting problem. The packing tools and equipment were tuned to soldered chips until Intel mostly fixed it with Devil's Canyon and newer silicon. The only reason to de-lid is if you want to run the chips naked or use a better TIM/liquid metal then the stock stuff.


You've made a specific claim and reiterated it above, that Devil's Canyon fixed the thermal issues - it didn't. I had a 4770k, then I bought a 4790k - stock to stock it was a marginal improvement. But once I de-lidded with liquid metal the temps dropped drastically. Not as much as Ivy Bridge, granted, thanks to the horrendous Z-height issue on those chips, but still a massive difference (in the 20C range under load when overclocked). Your theory is invalidated by simple testing.

So again, if you want to run stock with light workloads you're not going to see much of a difference, and those test conditions aren't relevant as they don't push the chips.
 
Krogoth
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Elder
Posts: 5605
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 3:20 pm
Location: somewhere on Core Prime
Contact:

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:33 pm

techguy wrote:
Krogoth wrote:
It always has been an IHS fitting problem. The packing tools and equipment were tuned to soldered chips until Intel mostly fixed it with Devil's Canyon and newer silicon. The only reason to de-lid is if you want to run the chips naked or use a better TIM/liquid metal then the stock stuff.


You've made a specific claim and reiterated it above, that Devil's Canyon fixed the thermal issues - it didn't. I had a 4770k, then I bought a 4790k - stock to stock it was a marginal improvement. But once I de-lidded with liquid metal the temps dropped drastically. Not as much as Ivy Bridge, granted, thanks to the horrendous Z-height issue on those chips, but still a massive difference (in the 20C range under load when overclocked). Your theory is invalidated by simple testing.

So again, if you want to run stock with light workloads you're not going to see much of a difference, and those test conditions aren't relevant as they don't push the chips.


Intel did fixed the IHS fitting QC problems though. Your first-batch Haswell (4770K) was most likely a lucky unit that had proper IHS fitting at the fab. I have an Ivy Bridge (3570K) that was one of the lucky ones. I have seen countless others who weren't as fortunate. They saw difference of ~10-20C difference between cores under a full load which suggested an IHS fitting problem/air-gap. De-lidding and reseating the IHS yielded massive returns on their chips.
Gigabyte Z390 AORUS-PRO Coffee Lake R 9700K, 2x8GiB of G.Skill DDR4-3600, Sapphire RX Vega 64, Corsair CX-750M V2 and Fractal Define R4 (W)
Ivy Bridge 3570K, 2x4GiB of G.Skill RIPSAW DDR3-1600, Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H, Corsair CX-750M V2, and PC-7B
 
techguy
Gerbil XP
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:12 am

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:40 pm

Krogoth wrote:
techguy wrote:
Krogoth wrote:
It always has been an IHS fitting problem. The packing tools and equipment were tuned to soldered chips until Intel mostly fixed it with Devil's Canyon and newer silicon. The only reason to de-lid is if you want to run the chips naked or use a better TIM/liquid metal then the stock stuff.


You've made a specific claim and reiterated it above, that Devil's Canyon fixed the thermal issues - it didn't. I had a 4770k, then I bought a 4790k - stock to stock it was a marginal improvement. But once I de-lidded with liquid metal the temps dropped drastically. Not as much as Ivy Bridge, granted, thanks to the horrendous Z-height issue on those chips, but still a massive difference (in the 20C range under load when overclocked). Your theory is invalidated by simple testing.

So again, if you want to run stock with light workloads you're not going to see much of a difference, and those test conditions aren't relevant as they don't push the chips.


Intel did fixed the IHS fitting QC problems though. Your first-batch Haswell (4770K) was most likely a lucky unit that had proper IHS fitting at the fab. I have an Ivy Bridge (3570K) that was one of the lucky ones. I have seen countless others who weren't as fortunate. They saw difference of ~10-20C difference between cores under a full load which suggested an IHS fitting problem/air-gap. De-lidding and reseating the IHS yielded massive returns on their chips.


I've de-lidded 3 Ivy Bridge CPUs, they all saw massive improvements with liquid metal.

How was my Haswell a "lucky" unit with "proper fitting" if replacing the TIM with liquid metal dropped my temps by over 20C?

The conclusions you have reached don't fit the data.
 
Waco
Gold subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2663
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Los Alamos, NM

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 5:39 pm

Krogoth wrote:
Intel did fixed the IHS fitting QC problems though. Your first-batch Haswell (4770K) was most likely a lucky unit that had proper IHS fitting at the fab. I have an Ivy Bridge (3570K) that was one of the lucky ones. I have seen countless others who weren't as fortunate. They saw difference of ~10-20C difference between cores under a full load which suggested an IHS fitting problem/air-gap. De-lidding and reseating the IHS yielded massive returns on their chips.

I don't see any evidence that Intel ever fixed it. Delid+refit even on modern non-solder TIM chips still give 15+ C reduction under load. My wife's 4770K dropped by nearly 30 C by delidding and refitting. I'm tempted to delid my 6700K since I have the tools and some extra liquid metal.
Desktop: Z170A Gaming Pro Carbon | 6700K @ 4.4 | 16 GB | Radeon VII | XSPC RX360 | Heatkiller R3 | Samsung 4K 40" | 2048 + 240 + LSI 9207-8i (128x8) SSD
NAS: 1950X | Designare EX | 32 GB ECC | 7x8 TB RAIDZ2 | 8x2 TB RAID10 | FreeNAS | ZFS | LSI SAS
 
Chrispy_
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4522
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Europe, most frequently London.

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Fri Nov 30, 2018 6:00 pm

I've never really OC'd any Ivy Bridge chip enough to worry about temperatures, but I absolutely had to de-lid my 4790, sand down the IHS to reduce the gap a bit, and throw some Conductonaut in there instead of any old goop.Temps dropped around 12-15C at full load, and I was happier with 55-60C than I was with 70C+.

If that was Devil's canyon, I'd hate to live with a 4770K.
Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.
 
End User
Gold subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2968
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 6:47 pm
Location: Upper Canada

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Sat Dec 01, 2018 11:18 am

I'm about to build a 9900K rig (waiting for the MB to arrive before I begin). I took a look into the delid & liquid metal option and I don't think it is worth it for me as this is just a gaming rig.

Gamers Nexus took a look at a 9900K delid & liquid metal. Their conclusion - not worth it unless you are a competitive OC'er:

https://youtu.be/0DKP77tX9VE?t=278
 
drfish
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Elder
Topic Author
Posts: 5284
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: Zeeland, MI

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:43 am

Image
TR BBQ XV is over.
 
End User
Gold subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2968
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 6:47 pm
Location: Upper Canada

Re: *plunge 3.0* Bought a $999 2080 Ti

Mon Dec 03, 2018 3:24 pm

The greatest words in the English language.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest