JohnC wrote:314.07 is the latest non-TITAN driver, huh? The 314.09 driver is only for the TITAN I think. I guess he could be using the BETA drivers, but meh.B.t.w, it looks like you're not using the latest drivers... Upgrade them :wink:
Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, morphine, SecretSquirrel
JohnC wrote:314.07 is the latest non-TITAN driver, huh? The 314.09 driver is only for the TITAN I think. I guess he could be using the BETA drivers, but meh.B.t.w, it looks like you're not using the latest drivers... Upgrade them :wink:
JohnC wrote:...well, just re-ran same test, using the stock settings (no TDP or temp limit changes). The good news is the difference between "overclocked" settings seem to be pretty insignificant:
End User wrote:JohnC wrote:...well, just re-ran same test, using the stock settings (no TDP or temp limit changes). The good news is the difference between "overclocked" settings seem to be pretty insignificant:
I'm rather shocked that your minium FPS is only 2.5 FPS greater than mine.
End User wrote:You shouldn't really be; Valley is really memory-bandwidth-limited and your cards have the same memory interface width (384-bit), so ...JohnC wrote:...well, just re-ran same test, using the stock settings (no TDP or temp limit changes). The good news is the difference between "overclocked" settings seem to be pretty insignificant:
I'm rather shocked that your minium FPS is only 2.5 FPS greater than mine.
auxy wrote:End User wrote:You shouldn't really be; Valley is really memory-bandwidth-limited and your cards have the same memory interface width (384-bit), so ...JohnC wrote:...well, just re-ran same test, using the stock settings (no TDP or temp limit changes). The good news is the difference between "overclocked" settings seem to be pretty insignificant:
I'm rather shocked that your minium FPS is only 2.5 FPS greater than mine.
JohnC wrote:Nah, it's just a poor benchmark overall... If you'll watch it running - you'll notice that the lowest "minimum FPS" drop occurs during the scene "transitions", where nothing is rendered on screen... Also, if you have some kind of background process that is using up considerable system resources - you might also get a "dip" in minimum FPS. Nothing to do with "memory bandwidth"
End User wrote:
JohnC wrote:This is an SLI setup...
End User wrote:JohnC wrote:This is an SLI setup...
Bingo
auxy wrote:It's also rather easy to cheat this benchmark with speedhacks ... eheh. ┐( ̄ヮ ̄)┌
cynan wrote:Hehe, I guess you aren't much of a cheater. Errm, not that I am! But those who fight devils... etc, etc.auxy wrote:It's also rather easy to cheat this benchmark with speedhacks ... eheh. ┐( ̄ヮ ̄)┌
Care to enlighten us?
auxy wrote:I'll post some TITAN benchmarks tonight when I get home! I need some 'alone time' with my PC and the card first tho.
Because it's gonna take me a really long time to install it -- moving that big heavy thing around is hard! (┳Д┳)
ClickClick5 wrote:auxy wrote:I'll post some TITAN benchmarks tonight when I get home! I need some 'alone time' with my PC and the card first tho.
Because it's gonna take me a really long time to install it -- moving that big heavy thing around is hard! (┳Д┳)
All the sexual puns intended.
ClickClick5 wrote:W-WHAT? (((((;゚Д゚)))))All the sexual puns intended. :D
auxy wrote:Longer than I thought!I'll post some TITAN benchmarks tonight when I get home! I need some 'alone time' with my PC and the card first tho.
Because it's gonna take me a really long time to install it -- moving that big heavy thing around is hard! (┳Д┳)
auxy wrote:auxy wrote:Longer than I thought!I'll post some TITAN benchmarks tonight when I get home! I need some 'alone time' with my PC and the card first tho.
Because it's gonna take me a really long time to install it -- moving that big heavy thing around is hard! (┳Д┳)
See my rant here.
ClickClick5 wrote:Did you read it?! I didn't get a chance to run it! I was up 'til 4:30AM just getting my machine to POST! (╥﹏╥) And now I think I'm sick...Sooooo, the bench pic is where?!
ClickClick5 wrote:That wasn't Valley FPS! x3 That was just a quick playthrough of Blacklight: Retribution.Also, nice overall FPS. I still cant fathom buying a $1k GPU, CPU, or a single part. My complete system costs about $1200 each build.
So, Thanks JohnC! ♥~(‘▽^人)
thecoldanddarkone wrote:LOL! I'm pretty surprised it was even able to run it on that pathetic Intel graphics~! Pretty amazing! Does it run okay without AA, or maybe in 720p without AA? (⊙△⊙✿)Surface pro (it's what I use as my laptop)
66 (I let it warm up for 5 minutes then ran the test to keep turbo off the score)
auxy wrote:ClickClick5 wrote:Did you read it?! I didn't get a chance to run it! I was up 'til 4:30AM just getting my machine to POST! (╥﹏╥) And now I think I'm sick...Sooooo, the bench pic is where?!ClickClick5 wrote:That wasn't Valley FPS! x3 That was just a quick playthrough of Blacklight: Retribution.Also, nice overall FPS. I still cant fathom buying a $1k GPU, CPU, or a single part. My complete system costs about $1200 each build.
Personal story incoming: I'm not a wealthy person; I have a nice enough PC, but all my "disposable" income more or less has gone into my PC for the last few years, and I work full-time. Until not-too-long-ago, I lived with my parents, and I was able to spend (read: waste) a lot of my money on computer parts. The last year and a half or so my girlfriend and I had our own place, but even limiting my spending to virtually nothing, we still can't afford it on my income plus what she makes as a bartender, so now we moved back in with her parents, since they have a gigantic house and we can have an entire floor (the top floor) all to ourselves.
Anyway, the point is, I would never have spent $1k on a GPU myself; there's no way I could ever afford something like this. I could maybe save and buy one, for sure, but justifying the expense would be impossible; I have too many other things in my life that I have to pay for.
So, Thanks JohnC! ♥~(‘▽^人)
ClickClick5 wrote:I'm still at work! 。・゚゚・(>д<)・゚゚・。Lol, sick or dead, where are my results?!