So, I was reading some rather old articles on the performance "gains" from the original Sabertooth board that showed very unimpressive thermal decreases in the range of 1-2 degrees C. The first time I saw one of these boards, the first thought that popped into my head wasn't wow I bet that runs cool; but more along the lines of I bet that looks great with proper modular cable management.
Several years have passed now since that first TUF boards and unsurprisingly ASUS is still making them and a few other board makers are either copying the design or getting more elaborate with their I/O shields and giant heat pipes. The real question is, has anybody done any thermal testing on these "lately", and has 5 years of tweaking the tech actually turned it around to make the $100-$200 premiums remotely justifiable.
In context, I am building a PC that has very poor air flow. There are two 120mm intakes on the right (top) of the case and the psu pulling air out on the left (bottom) with a few passive vents on the top panel and above rear i/o. Do to my limitations, there are a few steps I can do to compensate for the airflow restraints. Immaculate cable management, use an nvidia stock gpu cooler to pull air out, space out PCI cards as wide as possible, low height RAM, and add an after market low profile 140mm CPU cooler that will cool a large area surrounding the socket. But one thing I have always wondered about is how much gain is there from TUF armor in these circumstances. If I have one area of the board that is getting less airflow and more heat build up than other areas, just how much of that heat will be displaced by the armor. Or is this all still just one big marketing gimmick like painting a racing stripe on your car to make it go faster.