Personal computing discussed

Moderators: Flying Fox, Thresher

 
chuckula
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Jedi
Topic Author
Posts: 1986
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: Probably where I don't belong.

Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sat Jan 19, 2019 11:16 pm

First of all, you need to open a new tab and rock some of this to keep it rollin'.

Second of all, PCIe 5.0 is effectively finished and the 0.9 version of the specification was ratified by the PCIe SIG members on Thursday.

Version 0.9 means that the technological spec for PCIe 5.0 is complete and the only remaining work prior to an official 1.0 release is formalities like final clearance of intellectual property rights & whatnot. That release is expected to happen this quarter, so it'll bee soon. (More on the PCIe ratification process at wikipedia)

So before we really see any widespread release of PCIe 4.0 products, PCIe 5.0 will at least be an official standard. As a practical matter, I'd expect to start to see PCIe 5.0 products beginning next year, although it's entirely possible it will only be in high-end server systems first and gradually work its way down to the consumer space. I really don't know how long PCIe 4.0 will be the top-end for standard consumer systems, but suffice it to say I don't expect it to last 7 years like we have seen for PCIe 3.0. It's pretty neat that we are finally getting some movement on peripheral bandwidth after being stuck with PCIe 3.0 going all the way back to Sandy Bridge-E (standard Sandy Bridge was only 2.0).
4770K @ 4.7 GHz; 32GB DDR3-2133; Officially RX-560... that's right AMD you shills!; 512GB 840 Pro (2x); Fractal Define XL-R2; NZXT Kraken-X60
--Many thanks to the TR Forum for advice in getting it built.
 
Ifalna
Gerbil Team Leader
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:14 am
Location: Celestis

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:26 am

Cool, another number to charge more money for.

Are we even in a situation in which PCIe 3.0 isn't enough for typical consumer systems & workloads?
Bet PCIe 5.0 will be like 3.0 back in the day, neat number that does close to nothing in reality.
The backbone of modern industrial society is, and for the foreseeable future will be, the use of electrical Power.
 
Topinio
Gerbil Jedi
Posts: 1669
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:28 am
Location: London

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 4:58 am

Not about consumers, it's enterprise e.g. NVMe SSDs would be bottlenecked by an HBA if it you hung 4 off one (which you'd often want to do).

Probably it helps HPC applications offloading to GPGPU/accelerator boards too.
Desktop: E3-1270 v5, X11SAT-F, 32GB, RX Vega 56, 500GB Crucial P1, 2TB Ultrastar, Xonar DGX, XL2730Z + G2420HDB
HTPC: i5-2500K, DH67GD, 6GB, RX 580, 250GB MX500, 1.5TB Barracuda
Laptop: MacBook6,1
 
ronch
Graphmaster Gerbil
Posts: 1118
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:55 am

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 7:58 am

I miss the old days when 16-bit ISA was the norm and EISA was quite special.
NEC V20 > AMD Am386DX-40 > AMD Am486DX2-66 > Intel Pentium-200 > Cyrix 6x86MX-PR233 > AMD K6-2/450 > AMD Athlon 800 > Intel Pentium 4 2.8C > AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800 > AMD Phenom II X3 720 > AMD FX-8350 > RYZEN?
 
DragonDaddyBear
Silver subscriber
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 843
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:01 am

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 9:34 am

Ifalna wrote:
Cool, another number to charge more money for.

Are we even in a situation in which PCIe 3.0 isn't enough for typical consumer systems & workloads?
Bet PCIe 5.0 will be like 3.0 back in the day, neat number that does close to nothing in reality.

Kinda. Some CPUs are very limited to the number of lanes they have. If you only have 16 or so lanes to work with you would need to make a sacrifice to to have PCH, 10Gbps, GPU, NVMe slots, WiFi, and a GPU.
 
jihadjoe
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 745
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:34 am

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 11:46 am

Yeah PCIe 4.0 and 5.0 will be great for the mainstream desktop platforms that are limited to 16 lanes.
 
Dposcorp
Silver subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 12:27 pm

chuckula wrote:
First of all, you need to open a new tab and rock some of this to keep it rollin'.


Then go here for even better dancing
 
chuckula
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Jedi
Topic Author
Posts: 1986
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: Probably where I don't belong.

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 1:07 pm

DragonDaddyBear wrote:
Ifalna wrote:
Cool, another number to charge more money for.

Are we even in a situation in which PCIe 3.0 isn't enough for typical consumer systems & workloads?
Bet PCIe 5.0 will be like 3.0 back in the day, neat number that does close to nothing in reality.

Kinda. Some CPUs are very limited to the number of lanes they have. If you only have 16 or so lanes to work with you would need to make a sacrifice to to have PCH, 10Gbps, GPU, NVMe slots, WiFi, and a GPU.


I'd be very interested in a standard consumer CPU that implements effectively the same or slightly more bandwidth than Threadripper [60 lanes available PCIe 3.0 vs. 16 lanes of PCIe 5.0 is about the same] but only needs 16 lanes to do it, which makes it more practical for most motherboards on the market. An 8-lane PCIe 5.0 GPU with about the same bandwidth as a 16 lane PCIe 4.0 GPU (meaning about double what you get today) still leaves 8 lanes available for some ridiculously fast storage or networking equipment.
4770K @ 4.7 GHz; 32GB DDR3-2133; Officially RX-560... that's right AMD you shills!; 512GB 840 Pro (2x); Fractal Define XL-R2; NZXT Kraken-X60
--Many thanks to the TR Forum for advice in getting it built.
 
DoomGuy64
Gerbil
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 1:19 pm

Ifalna wrote:
Are we even in a situation in which PCIe 3.0 isn't enough for typical consumer systems & workloads?

Graphics cards could use it if nothing else, on a consumer level. We wouldn't need as much video ram, but performance would still be highly driver dependent for smart caching.
 
just brew it!
Gold subscriber
Administrator
Posts: 52313
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 10:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 1:27 pm

chuckula wrote:
I'd be very interested in a standard consumer CPU that implements effectively the same or slightly more bandwidth than Threadripper [60 lanes available PCIe 3.0 vs. 16 lanes of PCIe 5.0 is about the same] but only needs 16 lanes to do it, which makes it more practical for most motherboards on the market. An 8-lane PCIe 5.0 GPU with about the same bandwidth as a 16 lane PCIe 4.0 GPU (meaning about double what you get today) still leaves 8 lanes available for some ridiculously fast storage or networking equipment.

Underlined parts are the reason it won't happen any time soon. The sort of people who typically buy "standard consumer CPUs" have no need for "ridiculously fast storage or networking equipment". Making this available on consumer platforms is a solution in search of a problem.
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
chuckula
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Jedi
Topic Author
Posts: 1986
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: Probably where I don't belong.

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 1:55 pm

just brew it! wrote:
chuckula wrote:
I'd be very interested in a standard consumer CPU that implements effectively the same or slightly more bandwidth than Threadripper [60 lanes available PCIe 3.0 vs. 16 lanes of PCIe 5.0 is about the same] but only needs 16 lanes to do it, which makes it more practical for most motherboards on the market. An 8-lane PCIe 5.0 GPU with about the same bandwidth as a 16 lane PCIe 4.0 GPU (meaning about double what you get today) still leaves 8 lanes available for some ridiculously fast storage or networking equipment.

Underlined parts are the reason it won't happen any time soon. The sort of people who typically buy "standard consumer CPUs" have no need for "ridiculously fast storage or networking equipment". Making this available on consumer platforms is a solution in search of a problem.


I'd just point out that the same silicon that drives the 9900K is used in Intel's Xeon-E series and I'd expect that trend to continue in the future. While the consumer desktop does not necessarily need crazy I/O right now, the server market sure does, so I wouldn't be surprised to see PCIe 5.0 sooner rather than later. Maybe not in Ice Lake but Tiger Lake could certainly implement it.
4770K @ 4.7 GHz; 32GB DDR3-2133; Officially RX-560... that's right AMD you shills!; 512GB 840 Pro (2x); Fractal Define XL-R2; NZXT Kraken-X60
--Many thanks to the TR Forum for advice in getting it built.
 
just brew it!
Gold subscriber
Administrator
Posts: 52313
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 10:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 1:58 pm

chuckula wrote:
I'd just point out that the same silicon that drives the 9900K is used in Intel's Xeon-E series and I'd expect that trend to continue in the future. While the consumer desktop does not necessarily need crazy I/O right now, the server market sure does, so I wouldn't be surprised to see PCIe 5.0 sooner rather than later. Maybe not in Ice Lake but Tiger Lake could certainly implement it.

If they do something like that, it's a near-certainty that they'll artificially disable the PCIe 5.0 on the consumer platform.
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
Waco
Gold subscriber
Minister of Gerbil Affairs
Posts: 2667
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:14 pm
Location: Los Alamos, NM

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 6:18 pm

chuckula wrote:
As a practical matter, I'd expect to start to see PCIe 5.0 products beginning next year, although it's entirely possible it will only be in high-end server systems first and gradually work its way down to the consumer space.

I think you're being wildly optimistic. :)
Desktop: Z170A Gaming Pro Carbon | 6700K @ 4.4 | 16 GB | Radeon VII | XSPC RX360 | Heatkiller R3 | Samsung 4K 40" | 2048 + 240 + LSI 9207-8i (128x8) SSD
NAS: 1950X | Designare EX | 32 GB ECC | 7x8 TB RAIDZ2 | 8x2 TB RAID10 | FreeNAS | ZFS | LSI SAS
 
Chrispy_
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4525
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Europe, most frequently London.

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 6:41 pm

PCIe 2.0 is still good enough for me at home. Or maybe I'm on 3.0, I can neither remember nor care what PCIe version Z77 has.

Even PCI 1.0 (simulated as PCIe 3.0 x4 on modern hardware) will permit 94% of a a 2080Ti's peak performance, assuming anyone is dumb enough to spend so much on a graphics card for a 12+ year old system.
Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.
 
chuckula
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Jedi
Topic Author
Posts: 1986
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: Probably where I don't belong.

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 7:23 pm

Waco wrote:
chuckula wrote:
As a practical matter, I'd expect to start to see PCIe 5.0 products beginning next year, although it's entirely possible it will only be in high-end server systems first and gradually work its way down to the consumer space.

I think you're being wildly optimistic. :)


I don't necessarily think so. PCIe 4.0 was officially announced on June 8, 2017 and while it's taking a while to filter down to consumer-grade systems simply because of the standard upgrade cycle, in less than 2 years we have seen various products including 200Gbit ethernet adapters, solid state drives, and GPUs employ PCIe 4.0 already, including products that were out last year. That's not to say it's "widespread" but I'd expect there to be PCIe 5.0 products available in 2020 for the high-end following pretty much the same timeframe we have already observed for 4.0. If the rumors are to be believed, PCIe 4.0 did most of the heavy lifting and PCIe 5.0 takes advantage of the groundwork laid in the older spec, so the technical jump from PCIe 4.0 --> 5.0 is supposed to be quite a bit less than from 3.0 to 4.0.
4770K @ 4.7 GHz; 32GB DDR3-2133; Officially RX-560... that's right AMD you shills!; 512GB 840 Pro (2x); Fractal Define XL-R2; NZXT Kraken-X60
--Many thanks to the TR Forum for advice in getting it built.
 
DragonDaddyBear
Silver subscriber
Gerbil Elite
Posts: 843
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:01 am

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 9:20 pm

With 200Gbps links they need to feed something. If not 2020 then we will see faster networking in consumer devices shortly after. Even wireless is approachingmulti-gigabit these days and that's before AX.
 
Usacomp2k3
Gerbil God
Posts: 22562
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 4:53 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Sun Jan 20, 2019 10:33 pm

i don’t see anything above 10gb being useful for the consumer. Even that is very burst needs. There isn’t any creation or consumption that needs that sustained that I can think of.
 
Ifalna
Gerbil Team Leader
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:14 am
Location: Celestis

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Tue Jan 22, 2019 3:59 pm

Chrispy_ wrote:
PCIe 2.0 is still good enough for me at home. Or maybe I'm on 3.0, I can neither remember nor care what PCIe version Z77 has.

Should be 3.0, it's the same chipset I use (Ivy Bridge era).

chuckula wrote:
I'd be very interested in a standard consumer CPU that implements effectively the same or slightly more bandwidth than Threadripper [60 lanes available PCIe 3.0 vs. 16 lanes of PCIe 5.0 is about the same] but only needs 16 lanes to do it, which makes it more practical for most motherboards on the market. An 8-lane PCIe 5.0 GPU with about the same bandwidth as a 16 lane PCIe 4.0 GPU (meaning about double what you get today) still leaves 8 lanes available for some ridiculously fast storage or networking equipment.

Dumb question: can multiple devices use the same lane at the same time? I always thought that wouldn't be the case.

So 16 lanes of 5.0 would still be 16 lanes, even if the per lane throughput would be x4.
NVMe storage is pretty useless in most consumer situations though, so I wouldn't fuss about it.
The backbone of modern industrial society is, and for the foreseeable future will be, the use of electrical Power.
 
Mr Bill
Gold subscriber
Gerbil Jedi
Posts: 1606
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Colorado Western Slope
Contact:

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Tue Jan 22, 2019 4:13 pm

ronch wrote:
I miss the old days when 16-bit ISA was the norm and EISA was quite special.
and the VESA local bus before AGP came out. :D
X6 1100T BE | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 AM3+ | XFX HD 7870 | 16 GB DDR3 | Samsung 830/850 Pro SSD's | Logitech cherry MX-brown G710+ | Logitech G303 Daedalus Apex mouse | SeaSonic SS-660XP 80+ Pt | BenQ 24' 1900x1200 IPS | APC Back-UPS NS-1350 | WinXP64 Pro
 
Aranarth
Graphmaster Gerbil
Posts: 1188
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:56 am
Location: Big Rapids, Mich. (Est Time Zone)
Contact:

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Tue Jan 22, 2019 4:23 pm

ronch wrote:
I miss the old days when 16-bit ISA was the norm and EISA was quite special.


I had a couple machines with VLB...
Main machine: Core I7 -2600K @ 4.0Ghz / 16 gig ram / Radeon RX 580 8gb / 500gb toshiba ssd / 5tb hd
Old machine: Core 2 quad Q6600 @ 3ghz / 8 gig ram / Radeon 7870 / 240 gb PNY ssd / 1tb HD
 
ronch
Graphmaster Gerbil
Posts: 1118
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:55 am

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Fri Feb 01, 2019 3:48 am

Aranarth wrote:
ronch wrote:
I miss the old days when 16-bit ISA was the norm and EISA was quite special.


I had a couple machines with VLB...


Yeah, VLB was pretty cool back then as well. Too bad it was directly tied to the i486 bus so we're limited to 3 slots, and future CPUs probably made it hard to continue the VLB standard. Correct me if I'm wrong though.
NEC V20 > AMD Am386DX-40 > AMD Am486DX2-66 > Intel Pentium-200 > Cyrix 6x86MX-PR233 > AMD K6-2/450 > AMD Athlon 800 > Intel Pentium 4 2.8C > AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800 > AMD Phenom II X3 720 > AMD FX-8350 > RYZEN?
 
K-L-Waster
Gerbil XP
Posts: 346
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 8:10 pm
Location: Hmmm, I was *here* a second ago...

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Fri Feb 01, 2019 8:24 am

Aranarth wrote:
ronch wrote:
I miss the old days when 16-bit ISA was the norm and EISA was quite special.


I had a couple machines with VLB...


Micro-channel for the win IBM vendor lockin!

(Yeah, my Dad worked for IBM so we had a PS/2...)
Main System: i7-8700K, ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-E, 16 GB DDR4 3200 RAM, MSI GTX 1080 TI, 1 TB CRUCIAL MX500, Corsair 550D

HTPC: I5-4460, ASUS H97M-E, 8 GB RAM, GTX 970, CRUCIAL 256GB MX100, SILVERSTONE GD09B
 
just brew it!
Gold subscriber
Administrator
Posts: 52313
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2002 10:51 pm
Location: Somewhere, having a beer

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Fri Feb 01, 2019 8:38 am

Pffft... S-100 all the way!
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
 
Captain Ned
Gold subscriber
Global Moderator
Posts: 27511
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Fri Feb 01, 2019 8:41 am

K-L-Waster wrote:
Micro-channel for the win IBM vendor lockin!

As in Workin' for the MCA?
Humans sleep soundly in their beds because rough cats stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.
 
freebird
Gerbil
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:03 pm

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Fri Feb 01, 2019 10:35 am

just brew it! wrote:
chuckula wrote:
I'd be very interested in a standard consumer CPU that implements effectively the same or slightly more bandwidth than Threadripper [60 lanes available PCIe 3.0 vs. 16 lanes of PCIe 5.0 is about the same] but only needs 16 lanes to do it, which makes it more practical for most motherboards on the market. An 8-lane PCIe 5.0 GPU with about the same bandwidth as a 16 lane PCIe 4.0 GPU (meaning about double what you get today) still leaves 8 lanes available for some ridiculously fast storage or networking equipment.

Underlined parts are the reason it won't happen any time soon. The sort of people who typically buy "standard consumer CPUs" have no need for "ridiculously fast storage or networking equipment". Making this available on consumer platforms is a solution in search of a problem.


Yeah, not today, but like my college professor told me, "You'll never need the power of a 80386, on the desktop" (being a stupid PC builder, I disagreed)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7rhMqTQ4WI
 
Norphy
Gerbil Team Leader
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:05 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Fri Feb 01, 2019 11:23 am

Mr Bill wrote:
ronch wrote:
I miss the old days when 16-bit ISA was the norm and EISA was quite special.
and the VESA local bus before AGP came out. :D


VLB predates PCI, let alone AGP.
 
roncat
Gerbil
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:29 am

Re: Rollin' in my [PCIe] 5.0

Fri Feb 01, 2019 2:51 pm

Ah, VME bus computers with that blazing 40Mb/sec speed...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests