Personal computing discussed

Moderators: renee, Starfalcon

 
DPete27
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Topic Author
Posts: 3733
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:50 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Share Your GPU Undervolt

Thu Feb 16, 2017 12:24 am

[Updated for Accuracy]
There's been some discussion in various threads about undervolting GPUs to cut down on power/heat/noise, so I figured I'd share my findings here and make a place where others can share their results about cutting power consumption without giving up performance

This is a rudimentary guide from my experience undervolting my RX480
First off, there are many power saving options offered in the AMD settings.  "Power Efficiency", Frame Rate Target Control", and "Chill".  If your GPU is not restricted by thermal/voltage/power throttling, then it will run at its highest frequency in games unless you enable one of these features.
Power Efficiency:  Not 100% sure what this setting does behind the scenes, but I was able to use it effectively in Rise of Tomb Raider to lower power draw by an average of 15W without affecting framerates.  I used that feature while Global Wattman was set to Auto voltage. I don't believe this feature works as soon as you disable Auto voltage.
Frame Rate Target Control:   This feature allows the GPU to dynamically down-clock itself to only deliver a max of the target frame rate.  This has obvious power saving benefits depending on how un-demanding a particular game is.  A good choice for non-variable refresh rate monitors.
Chill:  Works similar to FRTC, with some added features.  Easier to just point you at TR's article on Chill.  In addition to a maximum frame rate, Chill will also reduce the GPU frequency to a minimum frame rate (set by you in the game profile) in scenes where there is little/no movement on screen.

Now, to the undervolting.  To do this in AMD Wattman, you'll go to Global Settings -> Global Wattman and toggle the GPU Frequency (on the left side of the window) from % to Dynamic, and Voltage Control from Auto to Manual.  This will populate the GPU core voltages from State 1 to State 7 (these are load states), as well as the memory frequency State 1. Write down the all 7 core frequencies that are displayed.
As mentioned before, as long as you're not hitting power/voltage/thermal limits, the GPU will/should always operate at the highest set frequency (typically State 7). To test any frequencies lower than that (take State 4 as an example) you'll need to set all core frequency states above that (States 5-7 in this example) at that same frequency.

An important thing to understand before you start is what the Memory Voltage does. Look at the GPU core Frequency/Voltage table you've just exposed. As the GPU core frequency decreases, it needs less voltage to keep it stable. Simple. However, unlike the GPU core that can change it's frequency, the VRAM always runs at a fixed speed under load (and a single lower speed when the card is idle). There is a necessary amount of voltage required to keep that VRAM stable also. The card always feeds the GPU core voltage to the VRAM also (you can see this if you look at the VRAM Voltage Out VOUT/VID and compare that to the GPU Core Voltage VDDC in HWMonitor). The "Memory Voltage" setting acts as a lower limit for the GPU core voltage to prevent feeding too little voltage to the VRAM and causing it to become unstable/crash. The reason we need to test for a minimum Memory Voltage here is to make the most out of power saving features like FRTC or Chill. If your Memory Voltage is set to the same value as the State 7 core voltage, the card may drop to lower frequencies, but the voltage will never go down. The more core States you can "open up" with a Memory Voltage that's lower than they are, the more flexibility you and/or your card has to adjust the power/heat/noise it's producing.

To test for the lowest stable VRAM voltage, you'll need to test the GPU core at a frequency that has a corresponding core voltage that's equal to or lower than the Memory Voltage you've set. This will enact the Memory Voltage limit, feeding the set minimum amount of voltage to the VRAM. You want to make sure here that you're not using a core clock and voltage that causes instability. So, say your core State 4 frequency has a voltage that matches your Memory Voltage limit. It would be a good idea to set States 4-7 at the same frequency as State 3 so you've got a conservative amount of voltage keeping the core stable here. I was able to do 2000MHz VRAM @ 920mV.

Once you get a stable memory voltage, set all the core States back to their default frequencies and voltages. Then lower the voltage for State 7.  Depending on what your particular GPU's advertised boost clocks are, and ASIC quality, will determine what the core voltage can be.  My 1305MHz state is plenty stable at 1030mV for example.  Test your settings for State 7.

Next, set the State 7 frequency and voltage equal to the values in State 6.  When you benchmark (with power saving features off), the GPU will ramp up to State 7.  Again, in order to test the lower States, you'll need to set every State higher than the one you're testing to be equal (ie. if you're testing State 4, frequency and voltage of States 4,5,6,and 7 need to be the same).  Proceed down the states as far as you like.  I tested States 5-7.

I found that creating an Excel scatter plot of my Frequency/Voltage curve helped visualize what intermediate states should be if you don't want to test for voltage at every state. If you set the Voltage Control toggle back to Auto at any point, there's a good chance your voltage curve will be lost, so it's nice to have a record of what you found stable.

Once you've got your settings dialed in, at the top of the window you can select "Save Profile" so you don't have to enter all these values again later if you're tinkering.

Quick tips:
    The GloFo 14nm process that AMD RX4xx and RX5xx series are fabricated on has a common inflection point around ~950mV. Above that voltage, the slope of the Frequency/Voltage curve steepens.
    Recently, AMD has expose an additional tweak called "Memory Timing" located on the left side of the WattMan window just above the Memory Frequency. I have tested this to produce up to a 5% increase in performance using "Timing Level 2" at the same core clock and voltage compared to "Automatic/Stock". You'll want to retest your Memory Voltage if you change this to anything except Automatic.
    The "Memory Voltage" setting acts as a lower limit for the GPU core voltage to prevent feeding too little voltage to the VRAM and causing it to become unstable/crash.
    Although undervolting opens up additional voltage/power headroom, [especially] if you're OCing, you may need to increase the "Power Limit" slider so your card can take higher voltages and reach higher clocks.
    I've noticed that some systems don't apply the manual WattMan profile accurately on cold boot. A restart fixes this issue for the current power on session.

One last thing.  If you prefer not to use power saving features like FRTC or Chill, or if FRTC or Chill are not working for your particular game/program, you can enable game-specific frequency curves by clicking on the game in AMD settings and navigating to Profile Wattman.  This is also where you set the upper and lower bounds of frame rates for Chill.

TL;DR, here are the settings I tested stable on my MSI RX480 Gaming X 8G:
Some people like to also reduce maximum frequency to avoid the range of exponential voltage increases needed to maintain higher frequencies than a GPU/architecture is comfortable with (AMD Hawaii GPUs were notorious for being pushed beyond their comfortable range by AMD).  My personal opinion is that I paid for the clock frequency of my card, so I'm not going to give that away.  Hence I'm only doing voltage adjustments and leaving my card's frequency curve alone.
ASIC Quality = 80.1%
Memory Voltage = 920mV at 2000MHz (8GHz effective)
Core Frequency/Voltage = 610MHz/818mV - 910/865 - 1075/900 - 1145/920 - 1190/935 - 1235/950 - 1305/1030.
Power usage as reported by GPU-z: Doom - Vulkan = 135W@1305MHz, 110W@1235MHz. Furmark = ~100W@1305MHz, and ~80W@1235MHz. Auto voltage setting wanted 1150mV for 1305MHz = 130W in Furmark.
[Updated after more testing in the 1190MHz-1235MHz range.]

Share your results!!
Last edited by DPete27 on Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:11 am, edited 6 times in total.
Main: i5-3570K, ASRock Z77 Pro4-M, MSI RX480 8G, 500GB Crucial BX100, 2 TB Samsung EcoGreen F4, 16GB 1600MHz G.Skill @1.25V, EVGA 550-G2, Silverstone PS07B
HTPC: A8-5600K, MSI FM2-A75IA-E53, 4TB Seagate SSHD, 8GB 1866MHz G.Skill, Crosley D-25 Case Mod
 
strangerguy
Gerbil Team Leader
Posts: 262
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 8:46 am

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:16 am

I managed to downclock and downvolt on GTX 1070 to 1708MHz core / 0.825V / 80% power limit from stock GPU boost ~1900MHz core / 1.05V in MSI Afterburner on custom voltage curve. Essentially I'm getting 90% of max stock performance but at 1/2 the TDP, but at the cost of RAM running at full speed wasting power for video decoding for some odd reason which is still something I couldn't manage to solve. It's rather insane how much NV overtuned GP104 and the same reason why I dislike auto overclocking features.
8700K 4.3GHz @ 1.05V | Cryorig H7 | MSI Z370M AC | 32GB Corsair LPX DDR4-3200 | GTX 1070 @ 0.8V | 500GB Evo 850 | 1TB M550 | 3TB Toshiba | Seasonic G650 | Acer XB271HU
 
ptsant
Gerbil XP
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:45 pm

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:38 am

I can confirm that my RX480 runs stable on 1240/975mV but anything below depends on the game. I run the memory at default settings, I don't think it matters much for power consumption and I did get some weird crashes when I tried 950mV.

I had measured the difference in maximum total system consumption to something like 50W (see on of my posts on the subject here: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=118160&p=1325144&hilit=ptsant#p1325866 )

As I reported earlier, anyone with an RX480 should at least try 1240/1000mV for core. If you want more perf, 1300+/1075mV may or may not work.
Image
 
DPete27
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Topic Author
Posts: 3733
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:50 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:49 am

ptsant wrote:
I run the memory at default settings, I don't think it matters

DPete27 wrote:
 I've found that the memory voltage seems to act as the lower limit of core voltage

My RX480 ran itself at 1305MHz/1075mV on auto at times, so I'd imagine that's a relatively safe bet for manual tweaking.  Other times it would go up to 1125mV.  Good point about measuring "stock" power draw though.  Testing ran late into the night last night, so I did my best to scramble together a forum post before I went to bed.  I'll have to update my original post with that info.  If I get time, I also want to drill into my voltage setting at 1235MHz.  I suspect my voltage setting of 975mV is still a bit conservative for that frequency, but it fit the curve well.
Main: i5-3570K, ASRock Z77 Pro4-M, MSI RX480 8G, 500GB Crucial BX100, 2 TB Samsung EcoGreen F4, 16GB 1600MHz G.Skill @1.25V, EVGA 550-G2, Silverstone PS07B
HTPC: A8-5600K, MSI FM2-A75IA-E53, 4TB Seagate SSHD, 8GB 1866MHz G.Skill, Crosley D-25 Case Mod
 
ptsant
Gerbil XP
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:45 pm

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:02 am

DPete27 wrote:
ptsant wrote:
I run the memory at default settings, I don't think it matters

DPete27 wrote:
 I've found that the memory voltage seems to act as the lower limit of core voltage

My RX480 ran itself at 1305MHz/1075mV on auto at times, so I'd imagine that's a relatively safe bet for manual tweaking.  Other times it would go up to 1125mV.  Good point about measuring "stock" power draw though.  Testing ran late into the night last night, so I did my best to scramble together a forum post before I went to bed.  I'll have to update my original post with that info.  If I get time, I also want to drill into my voltage setting at 1235MHz.  I suspect my voltage setting of 975mV is still a bit conservative for that frequency, but it fit the curve well.

I was unlucky in the chip lottery and got a relatively bad chip quality but I do have a very nice PSU. For an average chip I think 950mV should be doable at 1240MHz. Going below 950mV is probably only possible with the best chips and may not even be completely stable in all workloads.
Image
 
Jigar
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4925
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:57 am

Not RX 480 but running HD 7970 - 1050 MHZ @ 1030mV currently.
Image
 
ptsant
Gerbil XP
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:45 pm

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:30 am

Jigar wrote:
Not RX 480 but running HD 7970 - 1050 MHZ @ 1030mV currently.


That is quite an aggressive undervolt. I ran mine at 1090mV/1000MHz but undervolted at the BIOS. I could go a bit lower but didn't want to risk putting it into the BIOS.
Image
 
Jigar
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4925
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Fri Feb 17, 2017 4:02 am

ptsant wrote:
Jigar wrote:
Not RX 480 but running HD 7970 - 1050 MHZ @ 1030mV currently.


That is quite an aggressive undervolt. I ran mine at 1090mV/1000MHz but undervolted at the BIOS. I could go a bit lower but didn't want to risk putting it into the BIOS.


Actually these numbers are set in bios, since recently after 4 years of service my card refuse to run at 1100 MHZ @ 1175mV. Also, i am not playing any demanding games these days and usually playing Dota 2, DOOM or WarHammer 40K which works perfectly fine at full HD resolution. I think i wont mind if my card last me 2 more years as that will make this card my longest serving graphic card (6 years).
Image
 
ptsant
Gerbil XP
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:45 pm

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:32 am

Jigar wrote:
ptsant wrote:
Jigar wrote:
Not RX 480 but running HD 7970 - 1050 MHZ @ 1030mV currently.


That is quite an aggressive undervolt. I ran mine at 1090mV/1000MHz but undervolted at the BIOS. I could go a bit lower but didn't want to risk putting it into the BIOS.


Actually these numbers are set in bios, since recently after 4 years of service my card refuse to run at 1100 MHZ @ 1175mV. Also, i am not playing any demanding games these days and usually playing Dota 2, DOOM or WarHammer 40K which works perfectly fine at full HD resolution. I think i wont mind if my card last me 2 more years as that will make this card my longest serving graphic card (6 years).


Mine also served for a very, very long time and I would probably have kept it if I didn't want FreeSync. It still works in a secondary PC, in fact.
Image
 
Chrispy_
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4666
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Europe, most frequently London.

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:20 am

Need to double-check when I get home but I think I'm running a Gigabyte RX480 8GB reference board at 1275MHz/925mv and I'm limited in my undervolting by the Memory not the GPU.

Sure, you can set your GPU to 900mv but if your GDDR5 is set to 1000mv then all the tools report the GPU voltage as 1000mv.
Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.
 
Chrispy_
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4666
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Europe, most frequently London.

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Wed May 10, 2017 5:46 pm

Just an update to this thread, the old RX480 wasn't quite stable in the long term at 925mv - I think it was actually the VRAM that needed more juice in a couple of games so when I came to test this RX580 I noted that I'd been running 1275MHz @950mv all this time.

This RX580 (Sapphire Nitro+) seems to be very similar. I've stuck it on 1300MHz @1000mv for now and will perhaps update this post if I feel inclined to search for the optimal speed at the VRAM's lowest stable voltage.
Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.
 
manig
Gerbil In Training
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri May 12, 2017 6:44 am

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Fri May 12, 2017 6:53 am

I have an Asus Dual RX 480 O4G (4GB) overclocked with afterburner to 1340Mhz core /1850Mhz memory. I get stable 1340 core in Withcer 3. No crashes at all. Max temp is 83c with fan speed max 76% (custom curve). Default voltage. Powelimit +20.

I have a big room with large windows and room temp goes upto 50c and lowers slowly to 28c after I turn on aircon. In winters max GOU temp was 75c.

50" LG Full HD Led
i5 7500
16GB
 
DPete27
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Topic Author
Posts: 3733
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:50 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Fri May 12, 2017 9:24 am

Maning. I assume you're on auto voltage then? What does the core voltage read in GPU-z when the GPU is loaded?
Main: i5-3570K, ASRock Z77 Pro4-M, MSI RX480 8G, 500GB Crucial BX100, 2 TB Samsung EcoGreen F4, 16GB 1600MHz G.Skill @1.25V, EVGA 550-G2, Silverstone PS07B
HTPC: A8-5600K, MSI FM2-A75IA-E53, 4TB Seagate SSHD, 8GB 1866MHz G.Skill, Crosley D-25 Case Mod
 
manig
Gerbil In Training
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri May 12, 2017 6:44 am

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Sat May 13, 2017 9:12 am

DPete27 wrote:
Maning. I assume you're on auto voltage then? What does the core voltage read in GPU-z when the GPU is loaded?

It goes upto 1.313V at full load.
 
DPete27
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Topic Author
Posts: 3733
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:50 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 22, 2017 8:59 am

manig wrote:
It goes upto 1.313V at [1340MHz].

You'd probably be able to run 1340MHz @ 1.100 mV if you manually set voltages. Probably start and see if you can do 1340MHz @ 1.150V first and back down from there. See my first post in this thread for guidelines. Setting a manual voltage curve will likely save you a BUNCH of watts/heat. Probably close to 50W.
Main: i5-3570K, ASRock Z77 Pro4-M, MSI RX480 8G, 500GB Crucial BX100, 2 TB Samsung EcoGreen F4, 16GB 1600MHz G.Skill @1.25V, EVGA 550-G2, Silverstone PS07B
HTPC: A8-5600K, MSI FM2-A75IA-E53, 4TB Seagate SSHD, 8GB 1866MHz G.Skill, Crosley D-25 Case Mod
 
manig
Gerbil In Training
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri May 12, 2017 6:44 am

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 22, 2017 12:48 pm

DPete27 wrote:
manig wrote:
It goes upto 1.313V at [1340MHz].

You'd probably be able to run 1340MHz @ 1.100 mV if you manually set voltages. Probably start and see if you can do 1340MHz @ 1.150V first and back down from there. See my first post in this thread for guidelines. Setting a manual voltage curve will likely save you a BUNCH of watts/heat. Probably close to 50W.

Sorry its not 1.313v but 1.131v at 1340/1850.
 
Chrispy_
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4666
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Europe, most frequently London.

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 07, 2018 10:26 am

Resurrecting an old thread, because I've spent around three hours trying to get the very best out of my RX Vega 56 (Sapphire, reference model). I'm using Unigine Valley as a stress test, but the key to maxing out the GPU load is to use high-resolution/utlra/8xAA, pause the animation on a tree-heavy scene with wind and rain. The result is 100% full GPU load with no dips in GPU demand from scene changes (confirmed independently by Unigine, Wattman, and GPU-Z). Once I have a GPU-bottlenecked scene running at 1440p, I can put out a couple of results, using the default "Balanced" profile as a baseline.

It should be noted that My HBM2 runs at 960MHz/867mv and even if I pump waaaaay more voltage into it, I still start to see artefacts/corruption at 965MHz. No matter how low I set the voltage in Wattman, the minimum voltage the HBM2 will operate at is 867mv, and therefore that is the lowest possible VDDC for the core too. I've settled on a stable HBM2 overclock of 940MHz which is 25MHz lower than the point at which corruption appears and so far I've been gaming for around 5 today without any hiccups.

Factory stock settings (the baseline):
BIOS1, default 'Balanced' profile - 800MHz HBM2/Auto voltage/Auto clock/Auto temps
Performance = 72.9fps = 100%
Avg. clock = 1387MHz = 100%
Avg. fan = 2315RPM = 100%
Avg. Watts = 175W = 100%
Avg. VDDC = 952mv = 100%

AMD's idea of an efficient BIOS profile:
BIOS2, 'Power Save' profile - 800MHz HBM2/Auto voltage/Auto clock/Auto temps
Performance = 69.9fps = 96%
Avg. clock = 1278MHz = 92%
Avg. fan = 1885RPM = 81%
Avg. Watts = 135W = 77%
Avg. VDDC = 900mv = 95%

The lowest I can go:
Custom profile - 940MHz HBM2/867mv/1402MHz core/75-80C
Performance = 75.8fps = 104%
Avg. clock = 1296MHz = 94%
Avg. fan = 1888RPM = 81%
Avg. Watts = 133W = 76%
Avg. VDDC = 868mv = 91%

In summary, I don't seem to have much control over the undervolt, or the resulting core speeds. If you don't want to use the BIOS2 'Power Save' profile, your best bet for tuning Vega is to do what I did, without the trial-and-error:

  1. Find out what the minimum HBM2 voltage is (by dropping it to something stupidly low like 700mv, and then recording the actual minimum voltage)
  2. Set that voltage for 'State 6', 'State 7', and 'Memory Voltage'
  3. See how high you can push the HBM2 clocks before corruption
  4. Dial it back a few percent for stability
  5. Set power limit to +50% because you don't want that interfering with clockspeeds
  6. (Optional) Monitor the average fan speeds at full load, and then set the target speed to 15% higher, and minimum speed to 15% lower.
This last step keeps the cooling more constant and avoids the noisy spikes in fan noise that happen when the default fan settings let the temps climb too high, resulting in a fan-control 'panic' burst that's well in excess of your target speed.

I'm a little underwhelmed, really. The 'Power Save' profile on BIOS2 is almost as low as the card can operate already, and most of the performance gains from Vega appear to be in the HBM2 overclocking, which (hopefully) anyone with a Vega card already knows. Still, with a bit of tweaking I managed to get a 4% performance boost over stock settings whilst using 24% less power and making a reasonable noise reduction, and it's nice to be running a Freesync GPU+monitor combination again (It's totally worth it just for the mild 60>75Hz refresh rate bump)
Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.
 
Kretschmer
Gerbil XP
Posts: 462
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 10:36 am

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 07, 2018 12:16 pm

I had great luck undervolting my 1050Ti MaxQ GPU. It's running at a steady 0.9V and maintains 1700+ Mhz at that voltage. Of course, my laptop is more thermally limited and I may reduce clocks to lower temps and fan speeds.
 
DPete27
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Topic Author
Posts: 3733
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:50 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 07, 2018 12:21 pm

Chrispy, could you supply HBM2 frequency in each "profile"? I was a little confused at your 960MHz stated initially, then 940MHz at the end of the paragraph.
Main: i5-3570K, ASRock Z77 Pro4-M, MSI RX480 8G, 500GB Crucial BX100, 2 TB Samsung EcoGreen F4, 16GB 1600MHz G.Skill @1.25V, EVGA 550-G2, Silverstone PS07B
HTPC: A8-5600K, MSI FM2-A75IA-E53, 4TB Seagate SSHD, 8GB 1866MHz G.Skill, Crosley D-25 Case Mod
 
Chrispy_
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4666
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Europe, most frequently London.

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 07, 2018 12:50 pm

It's 940MHz in my custom profile, otherwise the two AMD profiles are 800MHz.

960MHz is the absolute limit of my HBM2. For all I know that's not long-term stable, so I've choosen to dial it back a little bit just so that I'm not running it right at the raggedy edge, if you know what I mean. Since 940MHz is also what the Vega64 runs at, it's a reasonable assumption that most cards are stable at this HBM2 speed;

I don't think they made "Vega56" and "Vega65" cards separately, I think they made "Vega" cards and then binned them and BIOSed them based on which ones passed muster as "Vega 64"s, which is why all Vega56 reference cards run on Vega64 BIOSes without exception. Sadly the core count seems to be hardcoded to the unflashable SoC ROM so you can't magically enable the disabled CU too see if it was binned for defect or voltage reasons :(

Also, I should clarify that my disappointment with Vega is relative. I'm really pleased with it as a singular data-point, it's just that I had access to a lot of RX480's and I managed to find one that clocked from 1.2V down to 925mv and that allowed me to get something like 99% stock performance for a 39% power reduction. That thing was sick.
Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.
 
freebird
Gerbil
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:03 pm

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 07, 2018 1:37 pm

Chrispy_ wrote:
Resurrecting an old thread, because I've spent around three hours trying to get the very best out of my RX Vega 56 (Sapphire, reference model)...


I think getting the "best" out of any Vega 56 Reference model is by putting the 64 BIOS on it... unless you are trying to run it a minimal power usage. Depending on noise tolerance or replacement with liquid cooling the Vega 56/64 can be undervolted and overclocked up to around 1530Mhz GPU & 1050-1100Mhz HBM2 I think I was running about 1000mv GPU & 975mv HBM2. I'll have to check when I get back home.

I run mainly lower GPU clock 1150 & 1100 HBM with something like 975/925 I think mostly (my 2xVegas mine while I'm not playing) and with those settings I can play a game of Age of Mythology: Titans and mine at the same time... hash rate sometimes dips a little and mining ethereum with Claymore will sometimes hang, but I still like to "play".
 
Chrispy_
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4666
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Europe, most frequently London.

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 07, 2018 2:08 pm

Yeah, I *am* trying to minimise noise/power - that's the point of an undervolt thread; "How cool/quiet can you go without giving up performance?"

I've tried a 64 BIOS but it doesn't affect the minimum voltage I can put through the HBM2, nor does it let me clock the HBM2 any higher than 965MHz. I'm guessing I was dealt a poor hand in the silicon lottery. At ear-splitting 4800rpm on the fans with the 64 BIOS, I can get 1550Mhz or so, but IMO the noise just isn't worth it. My 1440p 75Hz monitor just doesn't need that much performance, but my ears *do* need peace and quiet ;)
Last edited by Chrispy_ on Mon May 07, 2018 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.
 
biffzinker
Gerbil Jedi
Posts: 1998
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: AK, USA

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 07, 2018 2:10 pm

Chrispy_ wrote:
it's just that I had access to a lot of RX480's and I managed to find one that clocked from 1.2V down to 925mv and that allowed me to get something like 99% stock performance for a 39% power reduction. That thing was sick.

My XFX RX480 does 1288 MHz (OCed by XFX) at mV of 1.045 unfortunately the DDR5 doesn't want budge from stock even though their Samsung brand.
It would take you 2,363 continuous hours or 98 days,11 hours, and 35 minutes of gameplay to complete your Steam library.
In this time you could travel to Venus one time.
 
freebird
Gerbil
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:03 pm

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 07, 2018 5:02 pm

Chrispy_ wrote:
Yeah, I *am* trying to minimise noise/power - that's the point of an undervolt thread; "How cool/quiet can you go without giving up performance?"

I've tried a 64 BIOS but it doesn't affect the minimum voltage I can put through the HBM2, nor does it let me clock the HBM2 any higher than 965MHz. I'm guessing I was dealt a poor hand in the silicon lottery. At ear-splitting 4800rpm on the fans with the 64 BIOS, I can get 1550Mhz or so, but IMO the noise just isn't worth it. My 1440p 75Hz monitor just doesn't need that much performance, but my ears *do* need peace and quiet ;)


Minimizing Noise/Power may be the your point of this thread... but there are plenty of V56/64 owners that use under-volting to allow higher clocks on same or less power than the default BIOS.
I look as it as "insurance" so when I upgrade to something like 3440x1600 (hopefully at 100 or 144Mhz in the near future)

As far as the Vega 56 is concerned I haven't seen it able to get over 965-1000 Mhz on stock bios.... without the 64 BIOS, neither of my 56s would go over 965Mhz. With 64 BIOS 1100Mhz is no issue at all.

I decided to go water to get rid of all the fan noise. My Voltages are :
-cvddc 925,925
-mvddc 925,925
-powlim -20,-20
both cards can even run 1400 Mhz on the GPU with these setting, although some hard core gaming might require more juice. I use these settings mainly for mining and AoM:T (which is not an graphically intensive game)
Image

And here is another Vega56 with 64Bios on Air (in the same PC, soon to be watercooled also)
Image
 
Chrispy_
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4666
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Europe, most frequently London.

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 07, 2018 5:47 pm

Hmmm, I'll try reflashing a 64 bios back onto the P1 switch. I put it back to the stock BIOS because it wouldn't let me run the HBM at a lower voltage, hence no benefit to fan noise.

I've yet to find a game at 1440p that doesn't benefit from HBM2 speed increases. Potentially 1100MHz core and 1100MHz mem would be faster than 1300MHz core and 940MHz mem - and this is of interest to me because the core clock (and voltage) accounts for the lion's share of the power consumption (and thus heat/noise)
Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.
 
Krogoth
Gerbil Elder
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2003 3:20 pm
Location: somewhere on Core Prime
Contact:

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon May 07, 2018 8:46 pm

I must have a good sample of Vega 64.

It purrs along at ~1650Mhz/1000Mhz HBM with 950-1050vm core and 1000 vm memory while consuming around 200-250W. The GPU never goes above 75C with ran running at ~3000RPM.
Gigabyte Z390 AORUS-PRO Coffee Lake R 9700K, 2x8GiB of G.Skill DDR4-3600, Sapphire RX Vega 64, Corsair CX-750M V2 and Fractal Define R4 (W)
Ivy Bridge 3570K, 2x4GiB of G.Skill RIPSAW DDR3-1600, Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H, Corsair CX-750M V2, and PC-7B
 
Chrispy_
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4666
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Europe, most frequently London.

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Wed May 09, 2018 6:38 am

I flashed the 64 BIOS again last night and although you're right in that it let me run the HBM higher (crashes at 1020MHz instead of 965MHz), it also substantially raises the minimum power draw and harms the performance/Watt.

At the same voltages and speeds as the 56 BIOS for P6, P7, and HBM2, the 64 BIOS used significantly more power, probably because the 64 BIOS uses 0.95V base, instead of the 56 BIOS'es 0.90V, and power use increases exponentially with voltage increases.

In summary, the quietest option for me is the 867mV setting on a 56 BIOS with a 945MHz HBM2. The core clock hovers around 1295MHz regardless of whether I set higher values because that's all it can do whilst adhering to the minimum 867mV restriction. Unlocking the extra 75MHz of HBM2 with the 64 BIOS is not enough extra performance to justify the raised voltages. Perhaps this would be different if my HBM2 hit 1100MHz or something like that, but 5-6% more HBM2 performance is not worth a 15-20% power increase.

Admittedly, if I didn't care about fan noise, the 64 BIOS would net me a few extra percentage points, but THG did some extensive power/efficiency testing with Vega and the sweet spot is somewhere very close to the BIOS2 power-save profile, which would mean a core-only power draw of around 145W. Since that power draw happens at around 1200MHz on the core with the 56 BIOS, it seems that I am already running faster than the efficiency sweet spot, but it's close enough that the power/heat/noise don't change much.
Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.
 
lukinods
Gerbil In Training
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:15 pm

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:21 pm

Hello!

I have a ZOTAC GEFORCE GTX 1070 MINI ZT-P10700G-10M 8GB GDDR5 for a few days now and I have decided to try undervolting it.

I noticed while playing GTA V that clock went around 1830 mhz @ 1.050 V and temperature reached 82 degrees. I managed to make it work with 1847 mhz @ 875 mV but temperature stays the same just like fps. I dont know if I did it correctly..

but in any way, i see that many people manages to get the benefits!! wish you all luck
 
Jigar
Maximum Gerbil
Posts: 4925
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Mon Apr 08, 2019 11:51 pm

Jigar wrote:
I think i wont mind if my card last me 2 more years as that will make this card my longest serving graphic card (6 years).


Just a quick update, card died in Sept 2018, So almost 6 years isn't bad :)

Now using GTX 1070 EVGA SC2 everything stock.
Image
 
DPete27
Grand Gerbil Poohbah
Topic Author
Posts: 3733
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:50 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Re: Share Your GPU Undervolt

Thu Apr 18, 2019 9:05 am

Updated OP with some clarifications for AMD cards. Especially on the "Memory Voltage" setting, which I haven't exactly seen anyone on the internet properly and concisely explain so far.
Main: i5-3570K, ASRock Z77 Pro4-M, MSI RX480 8G, 500GB Crucial BX100, 2 TB Samsung EcoGreen F4, 16GB 1600MHz G.Skill @1.25V, EVGA 550-G2, Silverstone PS07B
HTPC: A8-5600K, MSI FM2-A75IA-E53, 4TB Seagate SSHD, 8GB 1866MHz G.Skill, Crosley D-25 Case Mod

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
GZIP: On