jihadjoe wrote:WD WD20EARS 29,134 hours (0% health)
Have you looked at the detailed SMART attributes to see which one it thinks is at EOL? If this drive has the head unload timer issue I'd guess it is the load/unload cycles one.
Personal computing discussed
Moderators: renee, morphine, Steel
jihadjoe wrote:WD WD20EARS 29,134 hours (0% health)
just brew it! wrote:jihadjoe wrote:WD WD20EARS 29,134 hours (0% health)
Have you looked at the detailed SMART attributes to see which one it thinks is at EOL? If this drive has the head unload timer issue I'd guess it is the load/unload cycles one.
Failure Predicted - Attribute: 1 Raw Read Error Rate, Errors occurred while reading raw data from a disk. Indicate problem with the disk surface or the read/write heads.
Failure Predicted - Attribute: 5 Reallocated Sectors Count, Count of sectors moved to the spare area. Indicate problem with the disk surface or the read/write heads.
There are 1264 bad sectors on the disk surface. The contents of these sectors were moved to the spare area.
The drive found 39 bad sectors during its self test.
Based on the number of remapping operations, the health of the disk was decreased in different steps.
There are 48 weak sectors found on the disk surface. They may be remapped any time in the later use of the disk.
More information: https://www.hdsentinel.com/hard_disk_ca ... ectors.php
Replace hard disk immediately.
Kougar wrote:It sort of does if the SSD is the OS drive. It will translate into monthly wear because Windows will SSD defrag those monthly to prevent shadow volume fragmentation issues.
derFunkenstein wrote:All you guys with like 6 and a half years of power-on time kinda blow my mind. Not sure I've ever had a hard drive last that long.
derFunkenstein wrote:All you guys with like 6 and a half years of power-on time kinda blow my mind. Not sure I've ever had a hard drive last that long.
Krogoth wrote:The last generation of longitudinal magnetic recording hard drives were built like tanks. Longitudinal-based HDD in general where more durable and tolerant to physical stresses then the current crop of PMR units. That’s party why HDD life expectency and warranties took a dip when PMR was starting to be used en mass.
ChronoReverse wrote:I have a Crucial C300 SSD that's apparently been on for 63917 hours or 7.3 years. Since it was introduced in 2010 and I didn't buy it right away, that sounds about right.
Aranarth wrote:I have a Dell PE 2800 running server 2003 with 73gb scsi drives in current operation.
I have no idea how to check the power on hours but since it has been on 24/7 since 2004(?) I'm pretty sure the hours on at least one of the drives is pretty high.
15yearsx365daysx24hours is ~131,000 hours...
Noinoi wrote:The WD Blue is 5462 hours, and the Fury is around the same ballpark as the Black.
Waco wrote:ChronoReverse wrote:I have a Crucial C300 SSD that's apparently been on for 63917 hours or 7.3 years. Since it was introduced in 2010 and I didn't buy it right away, that sounds about right.
That's not a HDD.
I have a couple 128 GB first-gen Indilinx drives that have been running since mid 2009. Rock solid once they were updated with stable firmware.
meerkt wrote:Noinoi wrote:The WD Blue is 5462 hours, and the Fury is around the same ballpark as the Black.
Are the Blue and Black SSDs or HDDs?
I don't think hours say much for SSDs.
meerkt wrote:Current or historic.
I think the highest I currently have is 22K, then a few 20Ks. Not sure about historic ones.