I saw at VE that ZDNet has posted a PC Magazine graphics card roundup that includes most of the newer cards on the market. You can jump right to the benchmarks results if you're impatient. The test suite isn't anything terribly out of the ordinary, but it does include DVD CPU utilization scores and a "Content Creation Winstone".
As you might expect, Matrox got the nod as a "business" card, and Creative's GeForce card put the smack down in the 3D testing. However, even though I know Matrox cards are nice in terms of video signal quality and the like, I have to wonder, outside the realm of professional artists, how much difference there really is between for most "business" use between one card and another.
|BenQ EW277HDR brings HDR10 in reach of mere mortals||1|
|Intel Pentium Gold chips now have Silver siblings||13|
|Acer ProDesigner PE320QK is big on size and color accuracy||2|
|Thermaltake's Nemesis Switch has enough buttons for all your macros||17|
|Zotac Gaming MEK1 PCs have the requisite pieces of flair||9|
|Toshiba's latest hard drives store 14 TB without shingles||65|
|Friday deals: a motherboard trio, a cheap CLC, and a rodent||11|
|Nvidia Titan V brings the power of Volta V100 to desktops||129|
|GeForce 388.59 drivers are ready for the Titan V apocalypse||6|