As the rest of us were indulging in year-end festivities late last month, the folks at DigiTimes were still busy collecting information from their sources at motherboard companies. According to the Taiwanese website's latest nuggets of hearsay, we may see triple-core Phenoms and faster quad-core Phenoms later than expected. First, DigiTimes explains that AMD has postponed the launch of its 2.4GHz Phenom 9700 and 2.6GHz Phenom 9900 processors to the second quarter of this year. Motherboard firm insiders claim the schedule for the two chips changed because AMD has not yet completed its B3 revision of the Phenom core, which will resolve the infamous TLB erratum.
Next, DigiTimes reports that the schedule for AMD's triple-core Phenom chips has also slipped. Supposedly, the first triple-core Phenoms won't come out until March, and they'll be based on the existing B2 revision that doesn't include the TLB erratum fix. DigiTimes says to expect the triple-core Phenom family to start off with 2.1GHz Phenom 8400 and 2.3GHz Phenom 8600 chips in March, followed by B3-based 8450 and 8650 models clocked at the same respective speeds in the second quarter. The two B3 chips will be accompanied by a 2.4GHz Phenom 8700, which DigiTimes suggests won't be based on the B3 stepping.
On the other side of the fence, the latest rumors place the launch of Intel's first 45nm Core 2 Quad processors in February or March. There will be three CPUs clocked at 2.5GHz, 2.66GHz, and 2.83GHz and with prices ranging from $266 to $530.
|Samsung's Notebook 9 portables rock eighth-gen Core i7s||1|
|Thursday deals: a nice Z370 mobo, a huge VA display, and more||0|
|Rumor: Ryzen 2 set for Q1 2018 and a Fenghuang APU breaks cover||39|
|TR's 2017 Christmas giveaway: eight days left and counting||7|
|MSI gives Radeon RX Vega cards an Air Boost||22|
|Corsair's latest SO-DIMM kit takes 32 GB of DDR4 to 4000 MT/s||8|
|Report: Intel Inside co-marketing program will get a budget cut||32|
|Gingerbread House Day Shortbread||17|
|iMac Pro details and release date come into focus||49|
|Full disclosure: while I work for Intel; the opinions I express here are my own I think I understanding the issue you ran into. For the Braswell platf...||+36|