When word got out that Titanfall would weigh in at 48GB on the PC, I kind of assumed that requirement had to do with super-high-res textures or the like. Well, that's not the case. According to Eurogamer, the game actually owes most of its massive footprint not to high-res textures, but to uncompressed audio.
To be precise, the PC version of Titanfall reportedly includes "a whopping 35GB of uncompressed audio."
Respawn Entertainment, the game's developer, claims the uncompressed audio was included for the benefit of slower PCs. "A two-core machine would dedicate a huge chunk of one core to just decompressing audio," says Richard Baker, Respawn's Lead Engineer. "We couldn't dedicate those resources to audio." The Xbox One decodes audio in hardware, so it has no such limitation.
As hesitant as I am to second-guess people who do this sort of thing for a living, I can't help being a tad dubious. Does audio decompression really require that much horsepower, even on a slow system? I suppose it's possible that Titanfall simply needs a lot of CPU time for game logic, and the developers simply couldn't spare the CPU cycles needed for audio decode.
Either way, those of us with mid-range and high-end PCs will have to put up with a 48GB game install without any real payoff—and that, if anything, is the disappointing part.
|TR's 2017 Christmas giveaway: eight days left and counting||4|
|Rumor: Ryzen 2 set for Q1 2018 and a Fenghuang APU breaks cover||9|
|MSI gives Radeon RX Vega cards an Air Boost||12|
|Corsair's latest SO-DIMM kit takes 32 GB of DDR4 to 4000 MT/s||3|
|Report: Intel Inside co-marketing program will get a budget cut||27|
|Gingerbread House Day Shortbread||17|
|iMac Pro details and release date come into focus||49|
|Radeon Software Adrenalin Edition: an overview||26|
|Tuesday deals: NVMe storage, a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, and more||9|
|Full disclosure: while I work for Intel; the opinions I express here are my own I think I understanding the issue you ran into. For the Braswell platf...||+35|