EVGA readies up a truckload of GTX 1050 and 1050 Tis

I love the smell of fresh graphics cards in the morning. Gerbils around the world have surely noticed by now that the GeForce GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti have been announced. That should come as little suprise, given that that info the rumor mill provided about these cards mostly came true. EVGA has just announced its complete lineup of GeForce GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti cards. As usual, the company has a card for every taste and price point.

EVGA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti FTW Gaming ACX 3.0

EVGA has a total of ten cards on offer: five GTX 1050s and five GTX 1050 Tis. The company uses its consistent (if confusing) naming scheme: regular and "FTW DT" for the reference-clocked versions, SuperClocked for cards with a little boost, SSC for versions with more oomph, and the FTW edition with all the bells and whistles. The regular and SC versions use single-fan coolers, while all the others use the company's dual-fan "ACX 3.0" arrangement.

EVGA GeForce GTX 1050 SC Gaming

As expected, the GTX 1050 Ti cards have 4GB of VRAM, while the GTX 1050s make do with 2GB. The VRAM speed is the same for all the cards at 7010 MT/s. Here's the skinny in table form, sorted by clock speed. We hope EVGA forgives us for shortening the product names somewhat.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Card Base clock (MHz) Boost clock (MHz) Fans
GTX 1050 Ti 1290 1392 1
GTX 1050 Ti FTW DT 1290 1392 2
GTX 1050 Ti SC 1354 1468 1
GTX 1050 Ti SSC 1366 1480 2
GTX 1050 Ti FTW 1379 1493 2

GeForce GTX 1050

Card Base clock (MHz) Boost clock (MHz) Fans
GTX 1050 1354 1455 1
GTX 1050 FTW DT 1354 1455 2
GTX 1050 SC 1417 1531 1
GTX 1050 SSC 1430 1544 2
GTX 1050 FTW 1442 1556 2

EVGA has yet to announce pricing, but interested buyers can hit up the company's website to be notified when the GTX 1050 or GTX 1050 Ti become available.

Comments closed
    • LoneWolf15
    • 3 years ago

    I really like the single fan EVGAs (the 750 Ti is similar). They fit great in mATX closures and provide good cooling, a decent fan motor, and in not a lot of space.

      • NovusBogus
      • 3 years ago

      I love them as well. I really, really, really want them to do a 1070 in that form factor even if it means cutting the speed back a few percentage points.

    • Chrispy_
    • 3 years ago

    Man, that’s an awful expensive looking heatsink for a 1050Ti.

    If the super basic model is $149, the 1050 Ti FTW Gaming ACX 3.0 is probably going to cost as much as those $185 RX470 and $199 1060s

    I mean, the super-basic $199 1060 can be found with rebates and it’s literally going to offer 75% more performance unless Nvidia have radically changed what constitutes a Pascal CUDA core for GP107!

    • toastie
    • 3 years ago

    Tables look backwards, or are the TI versions clocked slower than the non-TI?

      • NovusBogus
      • 3 years ago

      It matches EVGA’s website. And it makes sense, because the base 1050 has some of its cores disabled which allows for higher speed. Think CPUs and how Intel’s top of the line ten core 6950K is 200MHz slower than the eight core 6900K and 600MHz slower than the six-core 6850K.

      • Farting Bob
      • 3 years ago

      Thats accurate, the TI versions are bigger chips but at a slower clock speed. Should still be a step faster but the difference wont be as big as the rest of the numbers suggest.

    • crabjokeman
    • 3 years ago

    GTX 1050 Ti FSCK THIS STUPID NAMING SCHEME

      • crabjokeman
      • 3 years ago

      I can’t even type f-s-c-k ? This site is so anti-Linux.

      • chuckula
      • 3 years ago

      I thought the stupid naming scheme was the GTX 1060 that’s both 3GB and 6GB.

      Now its stupid to actually use different names for different GPUs?

        • crabjokeman
        • 3 years ago

        No, it’s dumb to use ‘FTW’ in a base-clocked model and in your highest-clocked model. Take your 3 downvotes and shove them.

          • chuckula
          • 3 years ago

          Thanks for actually putting a clear explanation of that in your first post.
          Oh wait, you didn’t.

          But you sure did act like a spoiled d-bag!

            • crabjokeman
            • 3 years ago

            Yeah, I assumed the reader would be smart enough to surmise that, especially since the article also pointed out the naming scheme sucked. Bad assumption on my part.

            • bittermann
            • 3 years ago

            Linux Sucks

            • SHOES
            • 3 years ago

            Baaaaaaaaaaammm!

          • torquer
          • 3 years ago

          You mad, bro?

      • ultima_trev
      • 3 years ago

      I miss the days when the Ti badge (or even the GTX badge) was only associated with higher performing products, not entry level offerings as well.

      Ti 200
      Ti 500
      560 Ti
      560 Ti (448 core version)
      660 Ti

      Most of those products stood for amazing price/performance.

    • derFunkenstein
    • 3 years ago

    I think some of the names are wrong in non-Ti table. Nots of Ti in the names.

      • morphine
      • 3 years ago

      No, they’re not. Nothing to see here, move along 😉

        • derFunkenstein
        • 3 years ago

        *rubs eyes*

        Oh, hey, look at that. I must have been seeing things. Feel free to downvote me. 😉

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This