Toshiba’s tiny BG4 SSDs have a renewed sense of speed

Toshiba's ball-grid-array SSDs offer OEMs a tempting blend of low cost, small size, and energy efficiency, but thus far those perks have come at the cost of speed. Historically, the company's BG-series drives skipped onboard DRAM and depended on NVMe's Host Memory Buffer (HMB) feature to offset the performance implications of that omission. However, as we saw when we reviewed the BG3's consumer-facing cousin, the RC100, HMB isn't a perfect substitute for good ol' memory chips. Toshiba acknowledges that fact and consequentially equipped BG3 drives with only a two-lane PCIe link.

That situation seem to be changing with the newest incarnation the series, the BG4. Toshiba claims that firmware improvements let those SSDs use HMB more effectively. Coupled with an upgrade to the latest and greatest 96-layer BiCS NAND, the drive's new tricks should let it hit 2250 MB/s sequential read speeds and 1700 MB/s sequential write speeds. On the random I/O side, the BG4 ought to be capable of hitting 380K read IOPS and 190K write IOPS. So improved are the BG4's transfer rates that Toshiba has finally deemed it time to outfit the drive with a four-lane PCIe link instead of just two.

Like its ancestors, the BG4 comes in a surface-mounted M.2-1620 version as well as a stubby little M.2-2230 stick. There's now a 1-TB version at the top of the lineup, where the BG3 only went up to 512 GB. The new drive has already been sampled to some of Toshiba's OEM partners, and the company expects broader availability in Q2 of this year. Expect to see this guy shipping inside of thin notebooks and embedded systems later in 2019.

Comments closed
    • albundy
    • 11 months ago

    i’d take anything in the crap dell’s at work these days. anything is better than the 5700 rpm rust spinners.

    • NTMBK
    • 11 months ago

    I know that people are fairly down on this, but if it replaces terrible eMMC then I’m all for it.

      • dragontamer5788
      • 11 months ago

      I agree. There’s certainly a market for a cheap NVMe SSD. The thing is, the RC100 was [b<]not[/b<] cheap. It was a cut-down SSD at normal SSD prices. I'd be all for this BG4 as long as it comes down to the right price. There's a lot of room for a low-end, low-cost flash chip (great for NAS OS-installations, or other small-OS / small-computer applications). EDIT: Chromebooks, Tablets, and any other low-end device that's still on eMMC can benefit. But the RC100 was no where close to eMMC costs.

    • Srsly_Bro
    • 11 months ago

    I know Jeff is leaving, but AMD just had a one hour event that is more significant than this SSD. Many other sites have their news up. Is this site getting the update today?

      • yeeeeman
      • 11 months ago

      This site is usually slow.

    • Neutronbeam
    • 11 months ago

    “stubby little”? Let’s not get judgemental Mr. Thomas–it prefers to think of itself as “length limited.”

      • Growler
      • 11 months ago

      It’s not the size of the drive that matters. It’s the performance.

        • LoneWolf15
        • 11 months ago

        So it was given a chance, and failed twice? Get the Viagra.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This