What exactly was AMD up to with the phone calls from lawyers to various vendors? Well, it's hard to say:
He said that while AMD USA had sent out letters to companies re-selling overclocked Athlons, the legal department at the company had confirmed that it had not issued cease and desist notices, nor had it threatened them with litigation.Hmm. If indeed AMD hasn't threatened litigation, why exactly did they have their lawyers contact vendors? Don't high-priced lawyers, in such scenarios, embody the threat of litigation?
AMD, he added, has a marketing and engineering agreement with Kryotech, which offers Athlon processors that use overclocking technology.
On a related note, the United Overclockers effort, formed to respond to AMD's recent legal moves, seems to be gaining some momentum. A number of vendors have joined up, making the effort a true coalition.