eWeek is reporting that Microsoft is stating that it may be forced to lower prices to better compete with open source software:
"To the extent the open source model gains increasing market acceptance, sales of the company's products may decline, the company may have to reduce the prices it charges for its products, and revenues and operating margins may consequently decline," it said.Declining software revenues and margins could curtail Microsoft's ability to fund hemorrhaging projects like the Xbox, but the company still has a ridiculous amount of cash on hand.
While I'm sure that few Windows users will be complaining if Microsoft lowers its software prices, I have to wonder how the open source and alternative OS communities will react. Microsoft can certainly afford to charge less for some of its software products, and I can imagine price cuts ruffling the feathers of more than just a couple of its competitors' feathers.
As a monopoly, Microsoft must tread lightly when it comes to competition. Could deep price cuts, rebates, or even "Buy Windows XP and get a MS Natural Keyboard" deals be seen as an abuse of Microsoft's monopoly? If so, what competitive avenues are open to the Redmond monopoly?
|TR's 2017 Christmas giveaway: four days left and counting||2|
|Intel delivers huge bandwidth boost to Stratix 10 MX FPGAs with EMIBs||0|
|Samsung CHG displays are the first to net DisplayHDR 600 certification||3|
|Acer details specs and prices of its Ryzen Mobile-powered Swift 3s||18|
|Google Project Tango is dead—long live ARCore||10|
|Thermaltake Sync box bridges RGB LED walled gardens||3|
|Intel tips off potential 960 GB and 1.5 TB Optane SSD 900Ps||8|
|Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vegas put a big chill on spicy-hot chips||27|
|Aerocool's Project 7 P7-C1 Pro case reviewed||8|
|TR Santa was kind to me last year, so in lieu of entering I wish you all a happy RNG!||+8|