There's an interesting story over at Wired on publicly-owned broadband networks that have been built in some US cities as an alternative to private ISPs. In addition to being cheaper than broadband from private ISPs, publicly-owned networks have other advantages:
Frustrated by slow or spotty deployment of high-speed Internet services by private telephone and cable companies, a growing number of cities and counties are considering the possibility of constructing their own networks. In most cases, services are operated through the same public utility that currently provides electrical power.At between $25-30 a month for service, publicly-owned broadband certainly does look like a good idea, especially for those who may not currently have access to private networks.
"This is something that's much too critical to be left in the hands of the private sector," said Edward Stern, a city councilman in Poulsbo, Washington, who is pushing a plan to build out a community-owned fiber network.
Personally, I'm far more excited about the possibility that publicly-owned broadband could one day be maintained as an essential service, which it really has become for many of us. As broadband Internet access becomes more important in many of our personal and professional lives, should governments be stepping in to build networks and provide more affordable and perhaps reliable service?
|Aerocool's Project 7 P7-C1 Pro case reviewed||6|
|Google Project Tango is dead—long live ARCore||7|
|Thermaltake Sync box bridges RGB LED walled gardens||3|
|Intel tips off potential 960 GB and 1.5 TB Optane SSD 900Ps||8|
|Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vegas put a big chill on spicy-hot chips||17|
|Antec P110 Silent touts quiet looks and quiet operation||11|
|Updated LG Gram laptops put heavy-duty power into feathery bodies||17|
|Monkey Day Shortbread||14|
|Thursday deals: a nice Z370 mobo, a huge VA display, and more||6|
|Nice but unoptaneable.||+11|