Last week when Metallica sued Napster, the big N gave its standard response: that it's not liable for the copyright violations of its users, and that any users who had been proven to violate copyright law would be banned. See the News.com story for details.
I don't think Napster really expected that to be taken so literally; Metallica hired a consulting firm, which proceeded to identify 335,435 Napster users that were illegally sharing Metallica songs. On Wednesday, Lars Ulrich himself (one of the members of Metallica, see this ZDNet story) will be delivering 60,000 pages of information on the 1.4 million violations.
My understanding is that new Napster ID's can be registered anonymously and practically at will, so I doubt this move will really slow down anybody whose user ID gets banned. I see this more as Metallica peeing on Napster's head. Just imagine trying to cull over 335,000 user ID's from 60,000 pages of printed text; I'm betting the records are irregular enough that attempting to use optical character recognition software and pull the ID's out won't work.
Could Metallica give Napster an electronic copy of the information to make things easier? Sure, but couldn't you see them giving Napster 60,000 pieces of paper just for the PITA factor? I could.
|Updated LG Gram laptops put heavy-duty power into feathery bodies||0|
|Monkey Day Shortbread||2|
|Thursday deals: a nice Z370 mobo, a huge VA display, and more||0|
|Samsung's Notebook 9 portables rock eighth-gen Core i7s||2|
|Rumor: Ryzen 2 set for Q1 2018 and a Fenghuang APU breaks cover||42|
|TR's 2017 Christmas giveaway: eight days left and counting||8|
|MSI gives Radeon RX Vega cards an Air Boost||22|
|Corsair's latest SO-DIMM kit takes 32 GB of DDR4 to 4000 MT/s||8|
|Report: Intel Inside co-marketing program will get a budget cut||32|
|Full disclosure: while I work for Intel; the opinions I express here are my own I think I understanding the issue you ran into. For the Braswell platf...||+37|