Friday night topic: Kelo and property rights

With the Supreme Court's Kelo decision this week, has government's right to seize property gone much too far?
By a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that governments may seize your business and even your home in order to facilitate private economic development schemes.
What happens when a corrupt local government is bought off by agents for a corporation wanting to develop on that prime property in the middle of town—currently occupied by a church, which provides no tax income? Should there be some check on a government's power to seize land?


Tip: You can use the A/Z keys to walk threads.
View options

This discussion is now closed.