NVIDIA announces GeForce 6100 integrated graphics

Today NVIDIA is announcing a new K8 chipset family that brings GeForce 6 graphics to the nForce4 platform. The chipset family is made up of a pair of interchangeable north and south bridge chips, with the former sporting DirectX 9-glass integrated graphics derived from NVIDIA’s GeForce 6 series. Integrated graphics is so important to NVIDIA’s new north bridge chips that rather than being branded with the nForce name, the new chips have been dubbed GeForce 6150 and GeForce 6100.

As you might expect from the GeForce 6 series, the GeForce 6100s support DirectX 9, Shader Model 3.0, and NVIDIA’s PureVideo technology. The chips have two pixel pipelines, one vertex unit, and 425MHz and 475MHz clock speeds for the GeForce 6100 and 6150, respectively. NVIDIA is using more than just clock speeds to differentiate the two north bridge chips, though. The GeForce 6150 has also been endowed with significantly more robust video output and playback capabilities than the 6100.

 
GeForce 6150

GeForce 6100
TV encoder Yes No
TMDS/DVI output Yes No
Graphics clock 475MHz 425MHz
MPEG2/WMV9
playback
HD 720p/1080i SD
Video scaling High quality (5×4) Basic (2×2)
PCI Express
slots
1 x PCI-E x16
2
x PCI-E x1
1 x PCI-E x16
1
x PCI-E x1

With a TV encoder, support for DVI and component output, and the ability to accelerate high definition MPEG2 and WMV9 playback, the GeForce 6150 looks ripe for duty in home theater and media PCs. The GeForce 6100, on the other hand, seems best suited for extremely low-end systems. Interestingly, though, both chips are being manufactured on a 90-nano fabrication process—a first for NVIDIA.

NVIDIA’s new GeForce 6100s are designed to interface with a couple of new south bridge chips that retain the nForce name. These chips are a part of the nForce4 family and inherit many of their features, such as a 1.6GB/s HyperTransport chipset interconnect and support for 300MB/sec Serial ATA transfer rates, from existing nForce4 chipsets. Fortunately, the new nForce4s haven’t inherited basic AC’97 audio from their predecessors; the new chips have been upgraded to Intel’s High Definition Audio standard.

 
nForce 430

nForce 410
Serial ATA
ports
4 2
RAID
0, 1, 0+1, 5 0, 1
Ethernet 10/100/1000 10/100
ActiveArmor Yes No

As you can see, the nForce 430 is the better-equipped of the new south bridge chips. The 430 has all the bases covered, including support for four-drive RAID 0+1 and 5 arrays, and ActiveArmor-accelerated Gigabit Ethernet. By comparison, the nForce 410’s two Serial ATA ports and basic 10/100 Fast Ethernet look pretty weak. At least NVIDIA’s firewall software is supported across the entire nForce4 line.


NVIDIA has designed its new chipset components to be pin-compatible, so motherboard manufacturers can mix and match GeForce and nForce components to suit different markets and hit different price points. It’s also worth noting that the GeForce 6100 series is capable of running alongside a discrete GeForce graphics card, allowing users to take advantage of extra monitor outputs. nTune should be fully supported by the new chipsets, too, provided that motherboard manufacturers put the proper hooks into their BIOSes.


The first motherboards equipped with NVIDIA’s new core logic will be available by the end of the month, and Asus, DFI, ECS, Foxconn, Gigabyte, Shuttle, and others have already signed on to build boards. System builders and OEMs will release products based on the new chipsets in early October, and given the GeForce 6150’s extensive array of video features, expect to see plenty of media boxes mixed in with the usual lineup of budget and business systems.

Comments closed
    • Hattig
    • 16 years ago

    I think that these chipsets will set the bar for future integrated chipsets.

    It will be interesting to see how the performance in games, video, outputs, etc, compares to other solutions.

    I noticed in a picture that an ASUS 6150 motherboard had DVI output on the motherboard. That is a good sign.

    Shame that the 6150 at least doesn’t support TC memory. I could easily see a 32MB chip on the motherboard running at 400MHz DDR. Still, I don’t think that games will be the primary use of this chipset!

    • GodsMadClown
    • 16 years ago

    Bring on the HDMI PC connectivity, just try not to make my recent LCD monitor purchase obsolete.

    • UberGerbil
    • 16 years ago

    HDMI spec claims to support “eight channels of 192KHz, 24-bit uncompressed audio” so there’s your single cable.

    Of course, it also has support for HDCP (content protection)…

    • Tupuli
    • 16 years ago

    b[

    • Forge
    • 16 years ago

    Yes and no. Yes, you can make it work in Linux just like almost any other craptastic softraid, by using dmraid.

    On the other hand, if you meant ‘does it do anything in hardware’ then of course not you daft duck.

    It’s a 4 port SATA controller with some nifty crap done through the drivers/BIOS. It’s not hardware RAID, and I really doubt you’ll *ever* see a good hardware RAID device built into a motherboard.

    If you want cheap softraid, then this will work as well as any other mostly-software mobo solution.

    If you want real hardware raid, then quit mumbling and whining and buy a nice 3Ware or Areca card.

    • Forge
    • 16 years ago

    I need a Tyan Thunder K8WE v2 with one of these GeForce 6150 suckers wedged in there.

    • Dissonance
    • 16 years ago

    The 6100s use system memory exclusively.

    • Namarrgon
    • 16 years ago

    An HTPC won’t do the job of an amplifier, so you still need that. And for quality purposes, you’re much better off keeping all the analog circuitry well away from the PC, so having a receiver doing the decode & DACs as well as the amplification is the way to go.

    I suppose if HTPCs offered 3x S/PDIF outputs, then it could decode locally & output PCM digital signals to external DACs, and you wouldn’t need realtime DD encoding in the HTPC. Or if a future digital interconnect allowed you to squeeze 5.1 channels of decoded PCM audio onto a single cable. But until then, I have to choose between DVD-resolution & full discrete surround from a DVD movie, or high-resolution WMV-HD video & only ProLogic audio. I really miss my SoundStorm…

    • dragmor
    • 16 years ago

    Yeah a G5 or G6 whenever they get around to that with this chipset would be nice.

    • btb
    • 16 years ago

    I dont see any mention of local graphic ram(TC cards had at least 16mb or so local cache?).. will the 6100 and 6150 have to rely completely on system memory?

    • ludi
    • 16 years ago

    /[

    • eitje
    • 16 years ago

    yeah, i know what you mean. i hope the pennies i planted in my backyard grow into a money tree.

    • PerfectCr
    • 16 years ago

    I meant I don’t need a TV Tuner or PVR fucntionality because I already have an HD-DVR. 😉

    • indeego
    • 16 years ago

    Looks cool. I really hope a large OEM picks up on these so that we can move away from intel on the business side, while staying cheapg{<.<}g

    • tay
    • 16 years ago

    I’d say yes its typical for most people that care about music and sound in DVDs. At least it supports HD-Audio. I’m still waiting for a dolby digital encoder by nvidia though. The old soundstorm is really as good as people say it is.

    • just brew it!
    • 16 years ago

    The southbridge RAID-5 probably isn’t hardware accelerated anyhow, so you likely wouldn’t lose any performance by using FreeBSD/Linux’s software RAID-5 support.

    • indeego
    • 16 years ago

    Is this typical to hook HTPC’s up to receivers, also? I mean, at this point, you’ve replaced a lot of what’s on the shelf, I thought the goal of a HTPC was to converge all these devices into oneg{

    • FireGryphon
    • 16 years ago

    When do the Shuttle boxes come out for this? This’ll be perfect for my friend’s HTPC.

    • FireGryphon
    • 16 years ago

    That *is* an HTPC.

    • wmgriffith
    • 16 years ago

    No, DD encoding is really more for an HTPC than a GPPC. Imagine this: you hook up your HTPC to your receiver via the single-cable S/PDIF rather than discrete 5.1 RCA because you’d rather your DVDs get decoded by your receiver. This is good because you threw good money on a DD license when you bought said receiver, but don’t care to throw similarly good money on a DD license for your DVD player (nVidia, WinDVD, PowerDVD, e.g. all charge extra afaik).

    Now fire up HL2 or Doom3. Where’s your multichannel surround sound goodness? Not there, unless you have real-time DD encoding, a la Soundstorm. In fact, if you’re particularly unlucky, you won’t get it with wmv-hd titles either.

    Now that HTPCs are becoming more common, it makes more sense to have Soundstorm now than it did before.

    • indeego
    • 16 years ago

    Wait, so now HTPC’s have to encode as well as play vids/music? Isn’t that… wait for it… making them more a general purpose PCg{

    • cRock
    • 16 years ago

    Is there any hope that the RAID 5 will work under Linux/BSD? If so, I forsee a cheap storage box with gig ethernet and RAID 5.

    • 5150
    • 16 years ago

    Damn, you beat me to it!

    • GodsMadClown
    • 16 years ago

    I hate to be the obligitory Soundstorm complainer, but…

    If they are indeed positioning the chipset to be a HTPC fit, then wouldn’t this be an ideal fit for a DD encoding sound solution? I mean sure it didn’t make much sense in a standalone PC, but in a Home Theater context, where the XBOX was designed to be in in the first place?

    Sigh. A real HTPC device will encode to a surround format in real time. Preferably DTS.

    • just brew it!
    • 16 years ago

    Excellent! Let’s hope it is as good in reality as it looks on paper.

    • Saribro
    • 16 years ago

    party down !!
    6150 + 430 for the win !
    now if only I had any actual money :/

    • zurich
    • 16 years ago

    The 6150 looks like it has HTPC painted all over it – hot!

    • PerfectCr
    • 16 years ago

    Wow nice! I don’t want a “HTPC” per se, but I do want a PC that will play HD video on my HDTV in my living room, and this might just fit the bill!

    • claymonkey
    • 16 years ago

    depending now how cheap a 6150 solution will be you have an easy way to have two DVI ports when you have a seperate video card.

    • lex-ington
    • 16 years ago

    How does this match up with the ATi chipsets, in particular the X300 on-board graphics.

    I thought the 6100 and X300 were pretty much on the same level ?!?!

    • bhtooefr
    • 16 years ago

    Hmm…

    I see a GF6150 with an nForce 410 in my future…

    (Don’t need the extra SATA ports, don’t need more than RAID 0, don’t need gigabit, and don’t want ActiveArmor.)

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This